Advertisement

Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 35–60 | Cite as

Work Opportunities in a Non-Traditional Setting for Women Exiting Welfare: A Case Study

  • Pamela A. Monroe
  • Lydia B. Blalock
  • Richard P. Vlosky
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to explore key issues regarding the need to provide jobs for women who are making the transition from welfare to wage work. A traditionally male-dominated industry, the secondary wood products industry, in a ten-parish rural region in northern Louisiana is used as a case study. One goal of the project is to explore barriers to expanding job opportunities for women in this industry, which is located in an economically disadvantaged region of the state. In-depth personal interviews were conducted with employers and business owners in this industry, and focus group discussions were conducted among employees at selected sites. Potential barriers to employing women in this industry are discussed, and recommendations for reducing barriers are made.

family policy female labor force participation welfare reform work readiness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Administration for Children and Families. (1996). The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996. [On-line]. Available: www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/opa/facts/prwora96.htm.Google Scholar
  2. Beaulieu, L. J. (1998). Welfare reform: An overview of key provisions. Information Brief of the Southern Rural Development Center. [On-line]. Available: www.ces.msstate.edu/~srdc.Google Scholar
  3. Brayfield, A., & Hofferth, S. L. (1995). Balancing the family budget: Differences in child care expenditures by race/ethnicity, economic status, and family structure. Social Science Quarterly, 76, 158-177.Google Scholar
  4. Browne, I. (1997). Explaining the Black-White gap in labor force participation among women heading households. American Sociological Review, 62, 236-252.Google Scholar
  5. Center for Business and Economic Research: Department of Economic Development. (1995). Parish Profiles. [On-line] Available: http://leap.nlu.edu/pprof96/shrevepo.htm.Google Scholar
  6. Diller, M. (1998). Working without a job: The social messages of the new workfare. Stanford Law and Policy Review, 9(1), 19-43.Google Scholar
  7. Edelman, P., & Bischak, G. (1997). Notes from the National Rural Development Council welfare reform meeting. [On-line] Available: http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/nrdp/edelman.html.Google Scholar
  8. Edin, K., & Lein, L. (1997). Making ends meet: How single mothers survive welfare and low-wage work. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, D. (1990). What motivates trainees. Training & Development Journal, 44, 91-93.Google Scholar
  10. Geller, P. A., & Hobfoll, S. E. (1994). Gender differences in job stress, tedium, and social support in the workplace. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 555-572.Google Scholar
  11. Gensler, H. (1996). The effect of welfare on migration. Social Science Research, 25, 281-291.Google Scholar
  12. Groginsky, S., & Smith, S. (1997). Overview of Federal Welfare Law and Child Care Provisions. [On-line]. Available: http://www.ncsl.org/statefed/welfare/ccsum.htm.Google Scholar
  13. Harris, K. M. (1996). Life after welfare: Women, work, and repeat dependency. American Sociological Review, 61, 407-426.Google Scholar
  14. Institute for Women's Policy Research. (1997). Child Care and Welfare Reform. [On-line]. Available: http://www.iwpr.org/WRNN6.HTM#research.Google Scholar
  15. Jencks, C. (1992). Rethinking social policy: Race, poverty and the underclass. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Johnson, N. B., & Provan, K. G. (1995). The relationship between work/family benefits and earnings: A test of competing predictions. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 24(4), 571-584.Google Scholar
  17. Johnson, B., & Ray, H. (1993). Employee-developed pay system increases productivity. Personnel Journal, 72(11), 112-117.Google Scholar
  18. Keefer, P. B., Monroe, P. A., Atkinson, E. S., & Garrison, M. E. (1996). Child care as an impediment to rural women's labor force participation. Family Perspective, 30(3), 257-274.Google Scholar
  19. Kirschenman, J., & Neckerman, K. M. (1991). “We'd love to hire them, but...”: The meaning of race for employers. In C. Jencks & P. E. Peterson (Eds.), The urban underclass (pp. 203-232). Washington DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
  20. Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Leahy, P. J., Buss, T. F., & Quane, J. M. (1995) Time on welfare: Why do people enter and leave the system? American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 54, 33-47.Google Scholar
  22. Monroe, P. A., & Tiller, V. R. (1998, November). Deconstructing commitment to work and family among welfare reliant women. Paper presented at the annual Theory Construction and Research Methodology Workshop of the National Council on Family Relations, Milwaukee, WI.Google Scholar
  23. National Partnership for Women and Families. (1998). Recent welfare reform legislation erects new barriers to employment for low-income women. [On-line] Available: ttp://www.nationalpartnership.org/workandfamily/workplace/lowincome/barriers2.htm.Google Scholar
  24. Nord, M., & Beaulieu, L. J. (1997). Spatial mismatch: The challenge of welfare-to-work in the rural South. Southern Perspectives, Newsletter of the Southern Rural Development Center. [On-line] Available: www.ces.msstate.edu/~srdc.Google Scholar
  25. Oliker, S. J. (1995). The proximate contexts of workfare and work: A framework for studying poor women's economic choices. The Sociological Quarterly, 36, 251-272.Google Scholar
  26. Perlmutter, F. D. (1997). From welfare to work: Corporate initiatives and welfare reform. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  27. Rank, M. R. (1985). Exiting from welfare: A life-table analysis. The Social Science Review, 59, 358-376.Google Scholar
  28. Rank, M. R. (1986). Family structure and the process of exiting from welfare. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 607-618.Google Scholar
  29. Rank, M. R. (1994a). A view from the inside out: Recipients' perceptions of welfare. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 21(2), 27-47.Google Scholar
  30. Rank, M. R. (1994b). Living on the edge: The realities of welfare in America. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Regional Economic Measurement Division, U. S. Department of Commerce. (1995). Bearfacts. [On-line] Available: http://leap.nlu.edu/docs1/BFACT.Google Scholar
  32. Rieger, B. J. (1995). Lessons in productivity and people. Training & Development Journal, 49(10), 56-58.Google Scholar
  33. Rose, N. E. (1995). Workfare or fair work: Women, welfare, and government work programs. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Rosenbaum, J. E., & Popkin, S. J. (1991). Employment and earnings of low-income Blacks who move to middle-class suburbs. In C. Jencks & P. E. Peterson (Eds.), The urban underclass. (pp 342-356). Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
  35. Stephenson, E. F., Jr. (1997). Even the underprivileged are rational: The incentive effects of welfare. Journal of Labor Research, 18(2), 367-372.Google Scholar
  36. Tweedie, J. (1996). Time limits in welfare reform. [On-line]. Available: www.ncsl.org/statefed/welfare/timlim.htm.Google Scholar
  37. U. S. Bureau of the Census. (1990a). Income and Poverty Characteristics. [On-line] Available: http://leap.nlu.edu/INCPV.Google Scholar
  38. U. S. Bureau of the Census. (1990b). Social Characteristics. [On-line] Available: http://leap.nlu.edu/SOCLC.Google Scholar
  39. U. S. Bureau of the Census. (1990c.) General Profile: Population and Housing Characteristics. [On-line] Available: http://leap.nlu.edu/POPHS.Google Scholar
  40. U. S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (1997a). Facts About Sexual Harassment. [On-line]. Available: http://www.eeoc.gov/facts/fs-sex.html.Google Scholar
  41. U. S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (1997b). Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [On-Line]. Available: http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/vii.html.Google Scholar
  42. Vlosky, R., Chance, P., Monroe, P., Hughes, D., & Blalock, L. (1998a). A market-based strategy for rural development in northwest Louisiana: Maximizing opportunities through value-added forest products industries. Report prepared for and submitted to funder, Economic Development Administration, US Department of Commerce. [available from first author]Google Scholar
  43. Vlosky, R. P., Chance, P., Monroe, P. A., Hughes, D., & Blalock, L. B. (1998b) “An integrated market-based model for value-added solid wood products sector economic development.” Forest Products Journal, 48, 11-12.Google Scholar
  44. Wright, P. M. (1992). An examination of the relationships among monetary incentives, goal level, goal commitment, and performance. Journal of Management, 18(4), 677-693.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pamela A. Monroe
    • 1
  • Lydia B. Blalock
    • 1
  • Richard P. Vlosky
    • 1
  1. 1.Louisiana State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations