Advertisement

Social Justice Research

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 253–282 | Cite as

From Status Politics to Technocratic Pluralism: Toleration of Religious Minorities in Canada

  • Pauline Côté
Article

Abstract

This paper examines patterns of public regulation as they may emerge throughout the West from controversies constructed around new and minority religions. Following Beckford's and Richardson's insights about the sociological exemplarity of these issues, we argue that evidence for some of these trends as well as clues for interpretation can be found in contemporary Canadian constitutional development that parallels and at times precedes that of Europe. Close examination of notions of society and religion found in more than 35 religion cases brought before the Canadian Supreme Court from 1951 to 1997 lead to the conclusion that beside governmental and parliamentary intervention, legal management of religious pluralism is assuming a decisively normative turn. Notions such as status politics, civic ethos, and technocratic pluralism are offered as an explanation of this trend.

status politics pluralism technocratic pluralism church and state minority religions constitution Canada Jehovah's Witnesses civic ethos 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Anthony, D., and Robbins, T. (1996). The contested authenticity of 'Free Exercise' and 'Free Speech': The convergence of anti-cult, anti-porn, and anti-speech discourses. In Carter, L. F. (ed.), The Issue of Authenticity in the Study of Religions, (6), in Bromley, D. G. (ed.), Religion and the Social Order, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 25–46.Google Scholar
  2. Barker, E. (1987). The British right to discriminate. In Robbins, T., and Robertson, R. (eds.), Church-State Relations: Tensions and Transitions, Transactions Books, New Brunswick, pp. 269–280.Google Scholar
  3. Baubérot, J. (ed.). (1994). Religion et laïcité dans l'Europe des Douze. Syros, Paris.Google Scholar
  4. Beaudoin, G. A., Mendes, E., and Beckton, C. F. (eds.). (1996). Charte canadienne des droits et libertés, Wilson et Lafleur, Montréal.Google Scholar
  5. Beckford, J. A. (1985). Cult Controversies: The Societal Response to New Religious Movements, Tavistock, London.Google Scholar
  6. Beckford, J. A. (1999). Social justice and religion in prison: The case of England and Wales. Social Justice Research 12: 315–322.Google Scholar
  7. Brandmeyer, G. A., and Denisoff, R. S. (1969). Status politics: An appraisal of the application of a concept. Pacific Sociological Review 12: 5–11.Google Scholar
  8. Cairns, A. C. (1995). Reconfigurations. Canadian Citizenship & Constitutional Change, Selected essays by Alan C. Cairns edited by Douglas E. Williams, McClelland & Stewart Inc., Toronto.Google Scholar
  9. Casanova, J. (1994). Public Religions in the Modern World, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  10. Champion, F. (1993). Les rapports Eglise-État dans les pays européens de tradition protestante et de tradition catholique: essai d'analyse. Social Compass 40(4): 589–609.Google Scholar
  11. Côté, P. (1991). Religious Minorities and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Laboratoire d'études politiques et administratives (cahier 91-06), Université Laval.Google Scholar
  12. Côté, P. (1993). Démocratie, ordonnancement, sécuration: Le cas canadien. In La démocratie dans tous ses États: Argentine, Canada, France, Presses de l'Université Laval, Québec, pp. 45–64.Google Scholar
  13. Côté, P. (1999). Culture séculière, culture religieuse, ethos civique et administration publique du symbole. Social Compass 46(1): 57–74.Google Scholar
  14. Côté, P., and Richardson J. T. (1998). “Their Church is the Street”. Jehovah's Witnesses and the courts: A sociological analysis. Paper presented at the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion Meeting, Montréal.Google Scholar
  15. Cotler, I. (1989). Liberté de conscience et de religion. In Beaudoin, G. A., and Ratushny, E. (eds.) Charte canadienne des droits et libertés, Wilson et Lafleur Ltée, Montréal, pp. 191–221.Google Scholar
  16. Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its Critics, Yale University Press, New Haven and London.Google Scholar
  17. Doyle, D. J. (1984a). Religious freedom and Canadian church privileges. Journal of Church and State 26(2): 293–311.Google Scholar
  18. Doyle, D. J. (1984b). Religious freedom in Canada. Journal of Church and State 26(3): 413–435.Google Scholar
  19. Eastland, T. (ed.). (1993). Religious Liberty in the Supreme Court: The Cases that Define the Debate over Church and State, Grand Rapids, Michigan, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, Cambridge, U.K., Ethics and Public Policy Center, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  20. Garay, A. (1998). The Judicial Precedents of the European Court of Human Rights and Religious Freedom Conference. Religious Rights and Public Policy: European and North American Perspectives. Krakow, Poland.Google Scholar
  21. Gonzalez, G. (1997). La convention européenne des droits de l'homme et la liberté des religions, Economica, Centre d'Études et de Recherches Internationales et communautaires, Université d'Aix-Marseille III, Paris.Google Scholar
  22. Guindon, H. (1990). Tradition, modernité et aspiration nationale de la société québécoise, Saint-Martin, Montreal.Google Scholar
  23. Gusfield, J. R. (1963). Symbolic Crusade, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
  24. Herbrechtsmeier, W. (1996). Religious authenticity as a function of state power. In Carter, L. F. (ed.). The Issue of Authenticity in the Study of Religions, (6), in Bromley, D. G. (ed.), Religion and the Social Order, JAI Press, Greenwich CT, pp. 3–23.Google Scholar
  25. Hill, D. (1980). (Special Advisor) Study of Mind Development Groups, Sects and Cults in Ontario, A Report to the Ontario Government. Official Government Publication, Toronto.Google Scholar
  26. Introvigne, M., and Melton J. G. (eds.). (1996). Pour en finir avec les sectes, Dervy, Paris.Google Scholar
  27. Jacobs, F. G. (1986). The 'limitation clauses' of the European Convention on Human Rights. In de Mestral A. et al. (eds.), La limitation des droits de l'homme en droit constitutionnel comparé, Cowansville, Éditions Y. Blais, pp. 21–40.Google Scholar
  28. Jepperson, R. L., and Meyer J. W. (1991). The public order and the construction of formal organizations. In Powell, W. W., and DiMaggio, P. (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, pp. 204–231.Google Scholar
  29. Kaplan, W. (1989). State and Salvation: The Jehovah's Witnesses and Their Fight for Civil Rights, University of Toronto Press, Buffalo.Google Scholar
  30. Knopff, R., and Morton, T. (1992). Charter Politics, Nelson Canada, Scarborough.Google Scholar
  31. Lajoie, A., Robin, R., Grammond, S., Quillinan, H., Rolland, L., Perrault, S., and Chitrit, A. (1994). Les représentations de “société libre et démocratique” à la cour Dickson: la rhétorique dans le discours judiciaire canadien. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 32(2): 295–391.Google Scholar
  32. Lamer, F. (1994). L'Arrêt Oakes et la liberté d'expression: plaidoyer pour un discours impopulaire. Revue Juridique Thémis 28: 613–659.Google Scholar
  33. Laurin Frenette, N., and Rousseau, L. (1983). Les centres de régulation: Essai sur les rapports entre l'Église et l'État dans l'histoire québécoise. Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses 12(3): 247–272.Google Scholar
  34. Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy in Plural Societies, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  35. Lipset, S. M. (1990). Continental Divide. The Values and Institutions of the United States and Canada. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  36. Macklem, P. (1984). Freedom of conscience and religion in Canada. University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review 42: 50–81.Google Scholar
  37. Manfredi, C. P. (1990). The use of the United States decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada under the Charter of rights and freedoms. Canadian Journal of Political Science 23(3): 499–518.Google Scholar
  38. Manfredi, C. P. (1993). Judicial Power and the Charter: Canada and the Paradox of Liberal Constitutionalism, University of Oklahoma Press, London.Google Scholar
  39. Markoff, J., and Regan, D. (1987). Religion, the state and political legitimacy in the world's constitutions. In Robbins, T., and Robertson, R. (eds.), Church-State Relations: Tensions and Transitions, Transactions Books, New Brunswick, pp. 161–182.Google Scholar
  40. McRae, K. (1974). Consociational Democracy. Political Accomodation in Segmented Societies, McClelland and Stewart Limited, Toronto.Google Scholar
  41. Mendes, E. P. (1996). The crucible of the Charter: Judicial principles v. judicial deference in the context of section 1. In Beaudoin, G. A., Mendes, E., and Beckton, C. F. (eds.), Charte canadienne des droits et libertés, Wilson et Lafleur, Montréal, pp. 101–136.Google Scholar
  42. Menendez, A. J. (1996). Church and State in Canada, Prometheus Books, Amherst.Google Scholar
  43. Moir, J. S. (1967). Church and State in Canada 1627–1867: Basic Documents, McClelland and Stewart Limited, Toronto.Google Scholar
  44. Moore, D. H. (1996). Religious freedom and doctrines of reluctance in post-Charter Canada. Brigham Young University Law Review: 1087–1139.Google Scholar
  45. Morin, J. Y., and Woehrling, J. (1992). Les constitutions du Canada et du Québec, Thémis, Montréal.Google Scholar
  46. Morton, F. L. (1987). The political impact of the Canadian Charter of rights and freedoms. Canadian Journal of Political Science 20(1): 31–55.Google Scholar
  47. Norman, E. R. (1968). The Conscience of the State in North America, Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
  48. O'Toole, R. (1982). Some good purposes: Notes on religion and political culture in Canada. Annual Review of the Social Sciences of Religion 6: 177–217.Google Scholar
  49. Penton, J. (1976). Jehovah's Witnesses in Canada: Champions of Freedom of Speech and Worship, Macmillan, Toronto.Google Scholar
  50. Perelman, C. (1984). Le raisonnable et le déraisonnable en droit. Au-delà du positivisme juridique, Librairie générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence, Paris.Google Scholar
  51. Pfeffer, L. (1984). Religion, State and the Burger Court, Prometheus Books, New York.Google Scholar
  52. Poulat, E. (1993). L'Europe religieuse des États. In Gilbert, V., and Willaime, J. P. (eds.), Religions et transformations de l'Europe, Presses universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, pp. 407–419.Google Scholar
  53. Richardson, J. T. (1995a). Minority religions (“cults”), freedom of religion, and the law: Comparisons of the U.S., Europe, and Australia. University of Queensland Law Review 18: 183–207.Google Scholar
  54. Richardson, J. T. (1995b). Minority religions, religious freedom, and the new pan-European political and judicial institutions. Journal of Church and State 37(1): 39–59.Google Scholar
  55. Richardson, J. T. (1998a). Law and minority religions: “Positive and negative” uses of the legal system. Nova Religio. The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions 2(1): 93–107.Google Scholar
  56. Richardson, J. T. (1998b). Legal and political status of new religions in the United States: Lessons for Germany? Presented at conference on “Debating New Religions” sponsored by CESNUR-REMID: Marburg, Germany.Google Scholar
  57. Richardson, J. T. (1999a). Social control of new religions: from “brainwashing” claims to accusations of child sex abuse. In Palmer, S., and Hardman, C. (eds.), Children in New Religions, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ, pp. 172–185.Google Scholar
  58. Richardson, J. T. (1999b). Law, social control, and minority religions. In Côté, P. (ed.), Chercheurs de dieux dans l' espace public/Frontier Religions in the Public Space, University of Ottawa Press, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  59. Robbins, T., and Beckford, J. A. (1993). Religious movements and church-state issues. In Hadden, J. K., and Bromley, D. (eds.), The Handbook on Cults and Sects in America, Greenwich, CT, pp. 199–218.Google Scholar
  60. Robbins, T., and Robertson, R. (1987). Church-State Relations: Tensions and Transitions. Transactions Books, New Brunswick.Google Scholar
  61. Robertson, R. (1987). General considerations in the study of contemporary church-state relationships. In Robbins, T., and Robertson, R. (eds.), Church-State Relations: Tensions and Transitions, Transaction Books, New Brunswick, pp. 5–11.Google Scholar
  62. Rueschmeyer, D., and Skocpol T. (eds.). (1996). States, Social Knowledge and the Origins of Modern Social Policies, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.Google Scholar
  63. Russell, P. H. (1985). The first three years in Charterland. Canadian Public Administration 28: 376–396.Google Scholar
  64. Russell, P. H. (1987). The Judiciary in Canada: the Third Branch of Government, McGraw-Hill Ryerson, Toronto.Google Scholar
  65. Russell, P. H. (1988). Canada's Charter: A political report. Public Law 385–401.Google Scholar
  66. Russell, P. H., Knopff, R., and Morton, T. (1989). Federalism and the Charter: Leading Constitutional Decisions, Carleton University Press, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  67. Satvinder, S. J. (1997). Freedom of conscience rights: Lessons for Great Britain. Journal of Church and State 39(4): 749–768.Google Scholar
  68. Schmeiser, D. H. (1964). Civil Liberties in Canada, Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar
  69. Schneiderman, D., and Sutherland, K. (eds.). (1997). Charting the Consequences: The Impact of Charter Rights on Canadian Law and Politics, University of Toronto Press, Buffalo.Google Scholar
  70. Scott, F. R. (1959). Civil Liberties and Canadian Federalism, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
  71. Shupe, A., and Bromley, D. (1994). Anti-Cult Movements in Cross-Cultural Perspective, Garland, New York.Google Scholar
  72. Starr, P. (1992). Social categories and claims in the liberal state. In Hull, D., and Douglas, M. (eds.), How classification Works. Nelson Goodman among the Social Sciences, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, pp. 154–179.Google Scholar
  73. Swinton, K. (1996). Freedom of religion. In Beaudoin, G. A., Mendes, E., and Beckton, C. F. (eds.), Charte canadienne des droits et libertés, Wilson et Lafleur, Montréal, pp. 141–169.Google Scholar
  74. Troper, M. (1994). Pour une théorie juridique de l'État, P.U.F., Léviathan, Paris.Google Scholar
  75. Turner, B. S. (1998). Status, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  76. Wah, C. R. (1992). Religion as a factor in child custody and visitation cases: Principles and pitfalls. American Journal of Family Law 6: 158–166.Google Scholar
  77. Wah, C. R. (1997). The best interests of the child and the question of allogeneic blood transfusions: Smallhorne v. Smallhorne. Family Law Review 29(1): 7–12.Google Scholar
  78. Wah, C. R. (1998). European Parliamentary Enquete Commissions: Justification of a Two-Tiered System of Religious Freedoms. Presented at conference on “Protection of Religious Minorities: Religious Freedom and Human Rights in Post-Communist Russia.” Krakow, Poland.Google Scholar
  79. Weiler, P.C. (1986). The evolution of the Charter: A view from the outside. In Weiler, J. M., and Elliot, R. M. (eds.), Litigating the Values of a Nation: The Canadian Charter of Rights and freedoms, Carswell, Toronto, pp. 49–62.Google Scholar
  80. Weinrib, L. E. (1994a). Of diligence and dice: Reconstituting Canada's constitution. In Macklem, P., Risk, R. C. B., Rogerson, C. J., Swinton, K. E., Weinrib, L. E., and Whyte, J. D. (eds.), Canadian Constitutional Law, Vol. II, Emond Montgomery Publications Limited, Toronto, pp. 113–125.Google Scholar
  81. Weinrib, L. E. (1994b). Limitations on rights in a constitutional democracy: Models of judicial review under Canada's Charter. In Macklem, P., Risk, R. C. B., Rogerson, C. J., Swinton, K. E., Weinrib, L. E., and Whyte, J. D. (eds.), Canadian Constitutional Law, Vol. II, Emond Montgomery Publications Limited, Toronto, pp. 132–137.Google Scholar
  82. Willaime, J.-P. (1990). État, pluralisme et religion en France. Du monopole à la gestion des différences. In Baubérot, J. (ed.), Pluralisme et minorités religieuses, Peeters, Louvain-Paris, pp. 33–42.Google Scholar
  83. Williams, R. H. (1997). Public religion and hegemony: Contesting the language of the Common Good, Presented at annual Meeting Society for the Scientific Study of Religion, San Diego.Google Scholar
  84. Wise, S. F. (1993). Upper Canada and the conservative tradition. In Mc Killop, A. B., and Romney, P. (eds.), God's Peculiar Peoples. Essays on the Political Culture in Nineteenth Century Canada, Carleton University Press, Ottawa, pp. 169–184.Google Scholar
  85. Zylberberg, J., and Côté, P. (1993a). Ô Canada: les avatars de la raison démocratique en Cour suprême. In La démocratie dans tous ses États, Presses de l'Université Laval, Québec, pp. 231–279.Google Scholar
  86. Zylberberg, J., and Côté, P. (1993b). Les balises étatiques de la religion au Canada. Social Compass 40(4): 529–553.Google Scholar

CASES CITED

  1. Adler v. Ontario, [1996] 3 Supreme Court Reports 609.Google Scholar
  2. Boucher v. the King, [1951] Supreme Court Reports 265.Google Scholar
  3. Canadian Civil Liberties Association v. Ontario (Minister of Education), 46 Canadian Rights Reporter 316.Google Scholar
  4. Central Okanagan School District No 23 v. Renaud, [1992] 2 Supreme Court Reports 970.Google Scholar
  5. Chaput v. Romain et al., [1955] Supreme Court Reports 834.Google Scholar
  6. Commission Scolaire Régionale de Chambly v. Bergevin, [1994] 2 Supreme Court Reports 525.Google Scholar
  7. Edwards Books and Arts Ltd v. The Queen, [1986] 2 Supreme Court Reports 713.Google Scholar
  8. Henry Birks & Sons v. Montreal, [1955] Supreme Court Reports 799.Google Scholar
  9. Hill v. Church of Scientology of Toronto, [1995] 2 Supreme Court Reports 1130.Google Scholar
  10. Hofer et al. v. Hofer et al., [1970] Supreme Court Reports 958.Google Scholar
  11. Lakeside Colony of Hutterian Brethen v. Hofer, [1992] 3 Supreme Court Reports 165.Google Scholar
  12. Lamb v. Benoît, [1959] Supreme Court Reports 321.Google Scholar
  13. Ontario Human Rights Commission v. Simpson-Sears, [1985] 2 Supreme Court Reports 970.Google Scholar
  14. P. (D.) v. S. (C.), [1993] 4 Supreme Court Reports 141.Google Scholar
  15. Re Caldwell et al., and Stuart et al., 15 Dominion Law Reports (4th) 1.Google Scholar
  16. Reference re Act to Amend the Education Act (Ont.), [1987] 36 Canadian Rights Reporter 305.Google Scholar
  17. Renvoi Relatif à la Loi sur l'Instruction Publique (Qué), [1993] 2 Supreme Court Reports 511.Google Scholar
  18. R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd, [1985] 13 Canadian Rights Reporter 64.Google Scholar
  19. R. v. Oakes, [1986] 1 Supreme Court Reports 139.Google Scholar
  20. Richard B. v. Children's Aid Society of Metropolitan Toronto, [1995] 1 Supreme Court Reports 315.Google Scholar
  21. Robertson and Rosetanni v. The Queen, [1963] Supreme Court Reports 651.Google Scholar
  22. Roncarelli v. Duplessis, [1959] Supreme Court Reports 121.Google Scholar
  23. Ross v. New Brunswick School District no 15, [1996] 1 Supreme Court Reports 827.Google Scholar
  24. Russow v. British Columbia, 44 Canadian Rights Reporter 377.Google Scholar
  25. S. (L.) v. S. (C.), [1997] 3 Supreme Court Reports 1003.Google Scholar
  26. Saumur v. City of Quebec, [1953] 2 Supreme Court Reports 299.Google Scholar
  27. Walter v. A. G. Alberta, [1969] Supreme Court Reports 383.Google Scholar
  28. Young v. Young, [1993] 4 Supreme Court Reports 3.Google Scholar
  29. Zylberberg v. Sudbury Board of Education, 34 Canadian Rights Reporter 3.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pauline Côté
    • 1
  1. 1.Laval UniversityQuebecCanada

Personalised recommendations