Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 285–303 | Cite as

Correlates and Predictors of Lottery Play in the United Kingdom

  • Elliot Coups
  • Geoffrey Haddock
  • Paul Webley


Previous studies of lottery play have tended to adopt one particular approach, concentrating on demographic, personality, cognitive, or social aspects of play. Using the recently introduced United Kingdom National Lottery, this study investigated variables associated with all of these approaches within an overall integrative framework. In a community sample (N = 160), Lottery play was positively correlated with friends' Lottery play, “Instants” Lottery play, frequency of other gambling, and misunderstanding of Lottery probability, and negatively correlated with level of education. In a regression analysis, friends' Lottery play, Instants Lottery play, and education level were significant unique predictors of Lottery play, and a combination of these and other variables accounted for 38% of the variance in playing behavior. The results are discussed predominantly in terms of the nature of lotteries as a social activity.


Regression Analysis Social Activity Community Sample Social Aspect Integrative Framework 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abbott, M., & Volberg, M. (1994). Gambling and pathological gambling: Growth industry and growth pathology of the 1990s. Community Mental Health in New Zealand, 9, 22–31.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, G., & Brown, R. I. (1984). Real and laboratory gambling, sensation seeking, and arousal. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 401–410.Google Scholar
  3. Arnett, J. (1994). Sensation seeking: A new conceptualization and a new scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 289–296.Google Scholar
  4. Brenner, R., & Brenner, G. A. (1990). Gambling and sperculation: A theory, history and a future of some human decisions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Browne, B. A., & Brown, D. J. (1994). Predictors of lottery gambling among American college students. Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 339–347.Google Scholar
  6. Camelot. (1995). A lottery for the nation. Watford: Author.Google Scholar
  7. Camelot. (1996). Camelot: Annual report and accounts 1996. Watford: Author.Google Scholar
  8. Coup that turned out to be a lottery. (1994, December 12). The Times.Google Scholar
  9. Coventry, K. R., & Brown, R. I. F. (1993). Sensation seeking, gambling and gambling addictions. Addiction, 88, 541–554.Google Scholar
  10. Gasparski, P. (1989). Internal-external control of reinforcement and some probabilistic and thinking indices. Studia Psychologica, 31, 215–222.Google Scholar
  11. Gilovich, T. (1983). Biased evaluations and persistence in gambling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1110–1126.Google Scholar
  12. Gilovich, T., & Douglas, C. (1986). Biased evaluations of randomly determined gambling outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 228–241.Google Scholar
  13. Griffiths, M. D. (1994). The role of cognitive bias and skill in fruit machine gambling. British Journal of Psychology, 85, 351–369.Google Scholar
  14. Griffiths, M. D. (1995). Adolescent gambling. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Holtgraves, T., & Skeel, J. (1992). Cognitive biases in playing the lottery: Estimating the odds and choosing the numbers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 934–952.Google Scholar
  16. Hong, Y. Y., & Chiu, C. Y. (1988). Sex, locus of control, and illusion of control in Hong Kong as correlates of gambling involvement. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 667–673.Google Scholar
  17. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430–454.Google Scholar
  18. Kuley, N. B., & Jacobs, D. F. (1988). The relationship between dissociative-like experiences and sensation seeking among social and problem gamblers. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 4, 197–207.Google Scholar
  19. Ladouceur, R., Dube, D., Giroux, I., Legendre, N. (1995). Cognitive biases in gambling: American roulette and the 6/49 lottery. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 473–479.Google Scholar
  20. Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 311–328.Google Scholar
  21. Langer, E. J., & Roth, J. (1975). Heads I win, tails it's chance: The illusion of control in a purely chance task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 951–955.Google Scholar
  22. Lester, D. (1980). Choice of gambling activity and belief in locus of control. Psychological Reports, 47, 22.Google Scholar
  23. Lyman, R. D. (1983). Selection of skill or chance determined reinforcement as a function of locus of control. Psychological Reports, 52, 43–46.Google Scholar
  24. Mikesell, J. L. (1991). Lottery expenditure in a non-lottery state. Journal of Gambling Studies, 7, 89–98.Google Scholar
  25. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. (1993). 1991 census: Sex, age, and marital status. London: General Register Office.Google Scholar
  26. Rogers, P., & Webley, P. (1997). “It could be us”: A cognitive and social psychological analysis of National Lottery play in the UK. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  27. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, (1, Whole No. 609).Google Scholar
  28. Shaw, G. B. (1889). The economic basis of socialism. In G. B. Shaw (Ed.), Fabian essays (pp. 35–61). London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  29. Shapurian, R., & Hojat, M. (1987). Descriptive statistics, reliability and validity of a short form of Rotter's locus of control scale given to Iranian college students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 65, 229–230.Google Scholar
  30. Wagenaar, W. A. (1988). Paradoxes of gambling behavior. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  31. Walker, M. B. (1992). The psychology of gambling. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  32. Yackulic, R. A., & Kelly, I. W. (1984). The psychology of the gambler's fallacy in probabilistic reasoning. Psychology: A Quarterly Journal of Human Behavior, 21, 55–58.Google Scholar
  33. Zuckerman, M. (1979). Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elliot Coups
    • 1
  • Geoffrey Haddock
    • 1
  • Paul Webley
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ExeterUK

Personalised recommendations