Advertisement

GeoJournal

, Volume 55, Issue 2–4, pp 549–556 | Cite as

Adapting capitalism: Household plots, forest resources, and moonlighting in post-Soviet Siberia1

  • Katherine R. Metzo
Article

Abstract

Economic reform in post-Soviet Russia has proceeded unevenly, resulting in broad variation between rural and urban areas. In the case study presented here, I examine how Communism's `economy of favors' has been transformed into a localized quasi-capitalist economy, which predominantly operates outside the national market economy. Using data from two villages in Tunkinskij Raion of the Buriat Republic in Russia, I look at how people at a micro-sociological level have adapted to current economic conditions. In particular I examine the relationships between informal networks and the ability to intensify agricultural production on household plots, to gain access to a variety of forest resources, and to find seasonal, part-time, or one-time work outside the household and the formal labor market.

agriculture exchange networks forest management households labor 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrews, Ed., 1997: How to make big rubles? Invest in a comrade's debt. New York Times. October 14, 1997.Google Scholar
  2. Campbell, R.W., 1992: The Failure of Soviet Economic Planning. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, Bloomington IN..Google Scholar
  3. Creed, G., 1998: Domesticating revolution: from socialist reform to ambivalent transition in a Bulgarian village Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA.Google Scholar
  4. Eyal G., Szelenyi I. and Townsley E. 1998: Making Capitalism without Capitalists, Verso, London.Google Scholar
  5. Forsyth J., 1992: A History of the Peoples of Siberia: Russia's North Asian Colony, 1581–1990. Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
  6. Gomboev B., 1996: The structure and process of land-use in inner Asia. In: Humphrey C. and Sneath D. (eds.), Culture and Environment in Inner Asia: The Pastoral Economy and the Environment, Vol. 1. The White Horse Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  7. Humphrey C. 1983: Karl Marx Collective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  8. Humphrey C., 1998: Marx Went Away, But Karl Stayed Behind. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  9. Humphrey C. 1999: 'Traders, 'disorder,' and citizenship regimes in provincial russia' in Burawoy M. and Verdery, K. (eds.), Uncertain Transition: Enthnographies of Change in the Postsocialist World. K. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc., Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
  10. Humphrey C. and Sneath D., 1999: The End of Nomadism? Society, State, and the Environment in Inner Asia. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
  11. Ledeneva A.V., 1998: Russia's Economy of Favors: Blat, Networking and Informal Exchange. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  12. McChesney A., 2000: FSC Grabs IOU Bull by the Horns. In: The St.Petersburg Times (from online archive at: http://www.sptimesrussia.com/).Google Scholar
  13. Meshcheryakov A., 1996: “Vidish' korovu? Eto televizor...” (See that cow? It's a television...) Otkrytaya Politika 15(9–10): 52–57.Google Scholar
  14. Rocheleau T.S. and Wangari, 1996: Feminist Political Ecology: Global Issues and Local Experiences. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Rossijskoe Statisticheskoe Agenstvo. (Russian Statistical Agency, [RSA]), 1999: Sel'skoe Xoziajstvo Respubliki Buriatii (Agriculture in the Buriat Republic). Ulan-Ude: State Committee for Statistics, Republic of Buriatia. No. 03–11.Google Scholar
  16. Staddon C.: 1999, Economic marginalisation and natural resource management in Eastern Europe. The Geographical Journal 165(2): 200–208 (also published in Bulgarian, in Problemite v Geografia, 1999, #1).Google Scholar
  17. Tokarev S.: 1958, Etnografiia Narodov SSSR. Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta, Moscou.Google Scholar
  18. Tolmachev V.I., 2001: State Ecology Inspector, Chair of Tunka State Committee on the Environment, personal communication.Google Scholar
  19. Treml, V. and Michael A., 1994: The growth of the second economy in the Soviet Union and its impact on the system, in Robert Campbell (ed.) The Postcommunist Economic Transfromation: Essays in Honor of Gregory Grossman. Westview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
  20. Verdery K., 1996: What Was Socialism, And What Comes Next? Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  21. Wedel J., 1998. Collision and Collusion: The Strange Case of Western Aid to Eastern Europe 1989–1998. St. Martin's Press, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Woodruff, D. 1999: Money Unmade: Barter and the Fate of Russian Capitalism. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  23. Zhimbiev, B. 2000: History of the Urbanisation of a Siberian City: Ulan-Ude. White Horse Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katherine R. Metzo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyIndiana UniversityBloomingtonU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations