, Volume 55, Issue 2–4, pp 529–540 | Cite as

Institutional change and natural resource use in coastal Vietnam

  • Cecilia Luttrell


Vietnam is currently undergoing a rapid economic and social transition involving the dismantling of the co-operative system and the official embracing of a market economy. The paper uses an institutional approach to examine adaptation to such changes in two coastal communes in mangrove forest areas. Having provided the historical and policy context of reforms which have taken place in Vietnam in the area of resource management, the paper goes on to discuss changes currently taking place in access to resources. The complexity of property rights regimes are then examined in the light of such changes, with particular focus on the effects of privatisation and the increased effects of integration with external markets. Using livelihood diversification as a key concept for understanding local adaptation to such changes, the paper concludes with discussion of the socially differentiated impacts of the process and the implications for future livelihoods.

adaptation institutional change livelihoods property rights Vietnam 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adger W.N. and Luttrell C., 2000: Property rights and the utilisation of wetlands. Ecological Economics 35: 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcorn J.B. and Toledo V.M., 1998: Resilient resource management in Mexico's forest ecosystems: the contribution of property rights. In: Berkes F. and Folke C. (eds.), Linking Social and Ecological Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  3. Beresford M. and Fraser L., 1992: Political economy of the environment in Vietnam. Journal of Contemporary Asia 22: 3–19.Google Scholar
  4. Bray F., 1986: The Rice Economies. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. De Janvry A., Sadoulet E. and Thorbeke E., 1993: State, market and civil organisations: new theories, new practices and their implications for rural development: introduction. World Development 21: 565–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ellis F., 1998: Household strategies and rural livelihood diversification. The Journal of Development Studies 35(1): 1–38Google Scholar
  7. Ellis F., 1999: Rural livelihood diversity in developing countries: evidence and policy implications. ODI Natural Resource Perspectives 40.Google Scholar
  8. FBIS Daily Report, East Asia July 28, 1993: US Foreign Broadcast Information Service, p. 87.Google Scholar
  9. Feeny D., Berkes F., McCay B. and Acheson J., 1990: The tragedy of the Commons: 22 years later. Human Ecology 18(1).Google Scholar
  10. Fforde A., 1983: The Historical Background to Agricultural Collectivisation in North Vietnam: the Changing Role of 'Corporate' Economic Power. Birkbeck Discussion Paper No. 159, University of London.Google Scholar
  11. Fforde A., 1990: Vietnamese agriculture: changing property rights in a mature collectivised agriculture. In: Wadekin K.E. (ed.), Communist Agriculture: Farming in the Far East and Cuba. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  12. Fforde A., 1993: The political economy of 'reform' in Vietnam – some re-flections. In: Ljunggren B. (ed.), The Challenge of Reform in Indochina. Harvard Institute for International Development, pp. 293–325Google Scholar
  13. Forsyth T., 1997: Industrialization in Vietnam: social change and environment in transitional developing countries. In: Auty R.M. and Brown K (eds.), Approaches to Sustainable Development. Pinter, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Giddens A., 1986: Sociology: A Brief but Critical Introduction. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  15. Giddens A., 1993a: New Rules of Sociological Method.A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies. Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  16. Gore C., 1993: Entitlement relations and 'unruly' social practices: a comment on the work of Amartya Sen. Journal of Development Studies 29(3): 429–460.Google Scholar
  17. Hanna S. and Munasinghe M., 1995: Property rights and the environment. Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics and The World Bank.Google Scholar
  18. Hy Van Luong, 1992: Revolution in the Village: Tradition and Transformation in North Vietnam 1925–1988. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu.Google Scholar
  19. Hy Van Luong, 1993: Economic reform and the intensification of rituals in two North Vietnamese villages, 1980–90. In: Ljunggren B. (ed.), The Challenge of Reform in Indochina. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 259–291.Google Scholar
  20. Irvin G., 1996: Emerging Issues in Vietnam: privatisation, equality and sustainable growth. European Journal of Development Research 8(2) 178–199.Google Scholar
  21. Jamieson N., 1981: Vietnam: A Study of Continuity and Change in a Sociocultural System. Ph.D. Diss., Honolulu, University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
  22. Jamieson N., 1985: The traditional Vietnamese village. Interculture 83.Google Scholar
  23. Jamieson N., 1986: The traditional family in Vietnam. Vietnam Forum 8.Google Scholar
  24. Jamieson N.L., 1993: Understanding Vietnam. University of California Press, California.Google Scholar
  25. Jordan A.J. and O'Riordan T., 1995: Institutional Adaptation to Global Climate Change (II): Core Elements of an 'Institutional' Theory. Working Paper GEC 95–21. Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, University of East Anglia and University College, London.Google Scholar
  26. Kerkvliet B.J.T., 1995: Village-State relations in Vietnam: The effect of everyday politics on decollectivisation. Journal of Asian Studies 54: 396–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kerkvliet B.J.T. and Selden M., 1998: Agrarian transformations in China and Vietnam. The China Journal 40: 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kolko G., 1997: Vietnam: An Anatomy of Peace. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  29. Le Trong Cuc and Sikor T., 1996: National agricultural development policy and rural organisation. In: Le Trong Cuc, Rambo A.T., Fahrney K., Vien T.D., Romm J. and Sy D.T. (eds.), Red Books, Green Hills: The Impact of Economic Reform on Restoration Ecology in the Midlands of Northern Vietnam. East West Centre, pp. 37–46.Google Scholar
  30. Leach M. and Mearns R., 1991: Poverty and Environment in Developing Countries: an Overview Study. Report to the ESRC Global Environmental Change Programme and the Overseas Development Administration. Economic and Social Research Council, Swindon.Google Scholar
  31. Leach M., Mearns R. and Scoones I., 1998: Challenges to communitybased sustainable development: dynamics, entitlements, institutions. IDS Bulletin 28(4):4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leach M., Mearns R. and Scoones I., 1999: Environmental entitlements: dynamics and institutions in community based natural resources management. World Development 27(2): 225–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lindskog E., Nguyen Van Anh and Vuong Xuan Tinh, 1998: Profit and Poverty in Rural Vietnam: Winners and Losers of a Dismantled Revolution. Curzon Press, London.Google Scholar
  34. March J. and Olsen J., 1999: An institutional perspective on political institutions (with March, J.G.). Governance 9(3): 247–264. Reprinted in March, J.G., The Pursuit of Intelligence. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 52–71.Google Scholar
  35. Ljunggren B., 1993: Market economies under Communist regimes. In: Ljunggren B. (ed.), The Challenge of Reform in Indochina. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 39–121.Google Scholar
  36. Ngo Vinh Long, 1973: Before the Revolution: The Vietnamese Peasant under the French. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  37. Nguyen Thanh Manh and Phan Thi Anh Dao, 1998: In: Phan Nguyen Hong, Nguyen Hoang Tri and Quan Quynh Dao (eds.), Preliminary Results of Research on the Socio-Economic Situation of Da Rang Commune, Xuan Giao District, Quang Ninh.Google Scholar
  38. North D.C., 1993: Economic Performance through Time. The Nobel Prizes 1993. The Nobel Foundation and the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  39. Ostrom E., 1986: An agenda for the study of institutions. Public Choice 48: 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ostrom E., 1990a: 'Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Co-operative Action.' New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Ostrom E., 1990b: Institutional Arrangements for resolving the commons dilemma. In: McCay, B. and Acheson, J. (eds.), The Question of the Commons.Google Scholar
  42. Ostrom E., 1992: Crafting Institutions for Self-Governing Irrigation Systems. Institute of Contemporary Studies, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  43. Popkin S.L., 1979: The Rational Peasant: the Political Economy of Rural Society in Vietnam. University of California Press, Berkerley.Google Scholar
  44. Rambo A.T., 1973: A Comparison of Peasant Social Systems of Northern and Southern Vietnam. Southern Illinois University Center for Vietnamese Studies, Carbondale.Google Scholar
  45. Sen A., 1981: Poverty and Famines: an Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. Oxford Univeristy Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  46. Sen A. (ed.), 1984: Rights and capabilities. Resources, Values and Development. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 307–324.Google Scholar
  47. Van Arkadie B., 1993: Managing the renewal process: the case of Vietnam. Public Administration and Development 13: 435–451.Google Scholar
  48. Vietnam Government Press, 1992: Constitution of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. Hanoi.Google Scholar
  49. Vietnam News Agency, 1999: Vietnamese people's living conditions improved. Vietnam News Agency.Google Scholar
  50. Watts M., 1998: Recombinant capitalism: state decollectivisation and the agrarian question in Vietnam. In: Smith A. and Pickells J. (eds.), Theorizing Transition: the Political Economy of Post-Communist Transformations. Routledge, London, pp. 450–505.Google Scholar
  51. Wiergersma N.A., 1988: Vietnam: Peasant Land, Peasant Revolution. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  52. World Bank, 1994: TheWorld Bank, East Asia and Pacific Region, Vietnam: Poverty Assessment and Strategy. Washington D.C.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cecilia Luttrell
    • 1
  1. 1.Oveseas Development InstituteLondon

Personalised recommendations