Abstract
In the context of robust statistics, the breakdown point of an estimator is an important feature of reliability. It measures the highest fraction of contamination in the data that an estimator can support before being destroyed. In geostatistics, variogram estimators are based on measurements taken at various spatial locations. The classical notion of breakdown point needs to be extended to a spatial one, depending on the construction of most unfavorable configurations of perturbation. Explicit upper and lower bounds are available for the spatial breakdown point in the regular unidimensional case. The difficulties arising in the multidimensional case are presented on an easy example in IR2 , as well as some simulations on irregular grids. In order to study the global effects of perturbations on variogram estimators, further simulations are carried out on data located on a regular or irregular bidimensional grid. Results show that if variogram estimation is performed with a 50% classical breakdown point scale estimator, the number of initial data likely to be contaminated before destruction of the estimator is roughly 30% on average. Theoretical results confirm the previous statement on data in IRd , d ≥ 1.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Cressie, N., 1993, Statistics for spatial data, 2nd Ed.: John Wiley & Sons, New York, 900 p.
Cressie, N., and Hawkins, D. M., 1980, Robust estimation of the variogram, I: Math. Geology, v. 12,no. 2, p. 115–125.
Donoho, D. L., and Huber, P. J., 1983, The notion of breakdown point, in Bickel, P. J., Doksum, K. A., and Hodges, J. L. Jr., eds., A Festschrift for Erich L. Lehmann: Wadsworth, Belmont, p. 157–184.
Genton, M. G., and Rousseeuw, P. J., 1995, The change-of-variance function of M-estimators of scale under general contamination: Jour. Comp. Appl. Math., v. 64, p. 69–80.
Genton, M. G., 1998, Highly robust variogram estimation: Math. Geology, v. 30,no. 2, p. 213–221.
Hampel, F. R., 1971, A general qualitative definition of robustness: Ann. Math. Stat., v. 42,no. 6, p. 1887–1896.
Hampel, F. R., 1974, The influence curve and its role in robust estimation: Jour. Am. Stat. Assoc., v. 69,no. 346, p. 383–393.
Hampel, F. R., 1976, On the Breakdown Points of Some Rejection Rules with Mean: Research Report, no. 11, Fachgruppe für Statistik, ETHZ.
Huber, P. J., 1981, Robust statistics: John Wiley & Sons, New York, 308 p.
Huber, P. J., 1984, Finite sample breakdown of M-and P-estimators: Ann. Math. Stat., v. 12,no. 1, p. 119–126.
Matheron, G., 1962, Traité de géostatistique appliquée, Tome I: Mémoires du Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières, no. 14, Editions Technip, Paris, 333 p.
Rousseeuw, P. J., and Croux, C., 1993, Alternatives to the median absolute deviation: Jour. Am. Stat. Assoc., v. 88,no. 424, p. 1273–1283.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Genton, M.G. Spatial Breakdown Point of Variogram Estimators. Mathematical Geology 30, 853–871 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021778626251
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021778626251