Advertisement

GeoJournal

, Volume 55, Issue 2–4, pp 477–484 | Cite as

Think global act local? Negotiating sustainable development under postcommunist transformation

  • Caedmon Staddon
  • David Turnock
Article

Abstract

These essays are offered as a contribution to the ongoing scholarly discourse concerned with environmental problems in East Central Europe (ECE). In this volume we concentrate on the local through papers that indicate the nature of environmental challenges and ways in which progress is being made not merely by legislation but by negotiating sustainability in a range of local situations. Written by social scientists, largely geographers and anthropologists, from Western Europe as well as ECE and North America these essays provide ethnographically-detailed case studies of local environmental transformations in eight different countries. The emphasis on locality studies unites all the authors who, in different ways, develop the central idea that the macrosociological oversimplifications of the 1980s and 1990s can only be countered, and indeed corrected, through careful consideration of the diversity of local realities. All the case studies are concerned with the environmental dimensions of postcommunist transformations, whether that be through pollution abatement, restructuring over rights to natural resources such as forests or the implementation of ecotourism as a local redevelopment strategy. Sustainable development is therefore a leitmotif of this collection and most of the papers offer empirically-grounded critique of the concept insofar as it has permeated debates about local development in the postcommunist world.

Keywords

Pollution Abatement Soviet Period Noise Abatement Pollution Limit Illegal Cutting 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arendt H., 1951: The Origins of Totalitarianism. Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Beckley T.M., 1998: The nestedness of forest dependence: a conceptual framework and empirical exploration.Society and Natural Resources 11: 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burawoy M. and Verdery K. (eds.), 1999: Uncertain Transition: Ethnographies of Change in the Postsocialist World. Rowman and Littlefield, London.Google Scholar
  4. Bridger S. and Pine F. (eds.), 1998: Surviving Postsocialism. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  5. Brzezinski Z., 1989: The Grand Failure: the Birth and Death of Communism in the 20th century. Scribners, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Eden S., 2000: Environmental issues: sustainable progress? Progress in Human Geography 24: 111–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Environmental Action Programme for Central & Eastern Europe, 1998: Setting Priorities: Abridged Version of the Document Endorsed by the Ministerial Council Lucerne 1993. World Bank and OECD, Washington, D.C. and Paris.Google Scholar
  8. European Commission, 1998: Guide to the Approximation of European Union Legislation, an updated version of SEC (97) 1608 25.08.1997. European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  9. European Commission, 2001: A sustainable Europe for a Better World: a European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.Google Scholar
  10. Lafferty W.M. and Meadowcroft J. (eds.), 2000: Implementing Sustainable Development: Strategies and Initiatives in High Consumption Societies. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  11. Luke T., 1998: Sustainable development as a power/knowledge system: the problem of governmentality. In: Fischer F. and Black M. (eds.), Greening Environmental Policy: the Politics of a Sustainable Future. Paul Chapman Publishing, London, pp. 21–32.Google Scholar
  12. Malia M., 1994: The Soviet Tragedy. Pantheon, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Markowitz P., 2000: Guide to Implementing Local Environmental Action programmes in Central & Eastern Europe. Institute for Sustainable Communities/Regional Environmental Centre for Central & Eastern Europe Montpelier and Szentendre.Google Scholar
  14. Mirovitskaya N., 1998: The environmental movement in the former Soviet Union. In: Tickle A. and Welsh I. (eds.), Environment and Society in Eastern Europe. Longman, Harlow, Essex, pp. 30–66.Google Scholar
  15. Petersen D.J., 1993: Troubled Lands: Environmental Pollution in the Former Soviet Union. RAND Corp., Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
  16. Randall J.E. and Ironside R.G., 1996: Communities on the edge: an economic geography of resource-dependent communities in Canada. Canadian Geographer 40: 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sachs W. (ed.), 1993: Global Ecology: a New Arena of Political Conflict. Zed Books, London.Google Scholar
  18. Sneddon C.S., 2000: Sustainability in ecological economics ecology and livelihoods: a review. Progress in Human Geography 24: 521–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Staddon C., 1998: Democratisation and the politics of water management in Bulgaria. In: Pickles J. and Smith A. (eds.), Theorising Transition: the Political Economy of Post-Communist Transformations. Routledge, London, pp. 347–372.Google Scholar
  20. Tickle A. and Welsh I. (eds.), 1998: Environment and Society in Eastern Europe. Longman, Harlow.Google Scholar
  21. United Nations Economics Commission for Europe, 2001: Assessment of Progress in Sustainable Development since Rio 1992: the Member States of the UNECE. UNECE, Geneva.Google Scholar
  22. World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987: Our Common Future Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caedmon Staddon
    • 1
  • David Turnock
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of the Built EnvironmentUniversity of the West of EnglandBristolU.K.
  2. 2.Geography DepartmentThe University, LeicesterU.K.

Personalised recommendations