Advertisement

GeoJournal

, Volume 55, Issue 2–4, pp 517–528 | Cite as

Local forest-dependence in postcommunist Bulgaria: A case study

  • Caedmon Staddon
Article

Abstract

This paper explores the changing relations between a community and its forested hinterland in postcommunist Bulgaria. While there has been much attention paid to general and national-scale issues in postcommunist environmental reconstruction (e.g. Carter and Turnock, 2002; Petersen, 1993), relatively little research exists that examines the specifically local impacts of broader postcommunist transformational processes. Environmental issues especially have tended to be treated at the national scale and through the lenses of either policy reform or overall environmental quality assessment. Little has been said about the mutually constitutive interactions between communities and their natural environments during periods of wholesale social transformation. Moreover, there is a need to move beyond empirical description and towards the theorisation of the changing relations between localities and their resource hinterlands. This paper develops further ideas about the role of rural, non-core, localities in the processes of postcommunist transformation, in particular the ideas of a `transition model of development' (Staddon, 1999) and `natural resource dependence' (Beckley, 1998; Randall and Ironside, 1996). Case study material is used to further develop a theoretical framework and to illustrate its immediate application and relevance to the worlds of scholarship and policymaking.

Bulgaria community impacts forest dependence forestry transition model of development 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altvater E., 1993: The Future of the Market: an Essay on the Regulation of Money and Nature After the Collapse of Actually Existing Socialism, translated by P. Camiller, Verso, London. Analytical Creative Group, 1998.Google Scholar
  2. Bauman Z., 1992: Intimations of Postmodernity. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Bernath J., 1999: Biological and economical aspects of utilisation and exploitation of wild growing medicinal plants in Middle and South Europe. Acta Horticulturae 500: 31–41.Google Scholar
  4. Blagoevgrad Regional Statistics Office, 2000: Statistics on Industrial Structure in the Razlog and Bansko Municipalities (in Bulgarian).Google Scholar
  5. Binkley C.S., 2000: A crossroad in the forest: the path to a sustainable forest sector in British Columbia. In: Salazar D.J. and Alper D.K. (eds.), Sustaining the Forests of the Pacific Coast, UBC Press, Vancouver, pp. 174–192.Google Scholar
  6. Blagoevgrad Regional Forestry Directorate, 1996: Analysis of organisation, management and results of forestry activities in Blagoevgrad district and its divisions in the period 1990–1995. Internal Report, Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria, (in Bulgarian).Google Scholar
  7. Bristow J., 1996: The Bulgarian Economy in Transition.Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.Google Scholar
  8. Bryant R. and Bailey S., 1998: Third World Political Ecology. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  9. Burawoy M. and Verdery K. (eds.), 1999: Uncertain Transition: Ethnographies of Change in the Post-Socialist World. Rowman and Littlefield, London.Google Scholar
  10. Carter F.W. and Turnock D. (eds.), 2002: Environmental Problems of East-Central Europe, second edition. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  11. Cellarius B.A., 2000: You can buy almost anything with potatoes: an examination of barter during economic crisis in Bulgaria. Ethnology 39(1): 73–92.Google Scholar
  12. Cellarius B. and Staddon C., 2002: Environmental non-governmental organisations, civil society and democratisation in Bulgaria. Eastern European Politics and Societies 16: 1.Google Scholar
  13. Crampton R.J., 1997: A Concise History of Bulgaria. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  14. Evans S., 2001: Community forestry: countering excess demands in England's National Parks. In: McCool S.F. and Moisey R.N. (eds.), Tourism, Recreation and Sustainability: Linking Culture and the Environment. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK. FAO, 1999.Google Scholar
  15. FAO, 2002: FAOStat Forestry Data. FAO Website, Geneva, http://www.fao.orgGoogle Scholar
  16. Foucault M., 1991: Governmentality. In: Burchell G., Gordon C. and Miller P. (eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 87–104.Google Scholar
  17. Government of Bulgaria, 1997: Law on forestry. In: Durzhaven Vestnik (State Gazette, 29/12/97). Government of Bulgaria, Sofia.Google Scholar
  18. Government of Bulgaria, 1997: Law on restitution of forested lands. In: Durzhaven Vestnik (State Gazette, 25/11/97). Government of Bulgaria, Sofia.Google Scholar
  19. Gregory D., 1994: Geographical Imaginations. Blackwell, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  20. Harvey D., 1996: Environment, Justice and the Geography of Difference. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  21. Harvey D., 1985: The Urban Experience. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  22. Held D., 1987: Models of Democracy. Blackwell, London.Google Scholar
  23. Kornai J., 1992: The Socialist System: the Political Economy of Communism. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  24. Leff E., 1993: Capitalism and nature. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 4(1): 44–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meurs M., Morissey M. and Begg. R., 1998: Village to state to market: agricultural ecology and transformation – the Bulgarian experience. In: Paskaleva K., Shapira P., Pickles J. and Koulov B., (eds.), Bulgaria in Transition: Environmental Consequences of Political and Economic Transformation. Ashgate, pp. 23–38.Google Scholar
  26. Medved M. and Winkler I., 1995: Changes in the forest structure due to denationalisation and the impact on forest management. In: Brandl H. (ed.), Private Forestry: Chances and Challenges for Countries in Transition. Ministerium fur Landlichen Raum, Ernahrung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten, Baden-Wurttemberg, pp. 55–73.Google Scholar
  27. Muth B., 1998: Illegal harvest of renewable natural resources in North America: toward a typology of the motivations for poaching. Society and Natural Resources 11(1).Google Scholar
  28. Naidenova R., Popov P., Michev N. and Ilieva M., 1989–1990: Natural and Economic Potential of the Mountains in Bulgaria, two volumes. Bulgaria: Bulgarian Academy of Science, Sofia, (in Bulgarian).Google Scholar
  29. National Forestry Administration, 2000: Claims for Forest Restitution in Bulgaria, 1999.Google Scholar
  30. Natsionalien Statistichecki Institut, 1998: Statistical Yearbook. National Statistics Institute, Sofia, Bulgaria.Google Scholar
  31. O'Connor J., 1988: Capitalism, nature, socialism: a theoretical introduction, Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 1.Google Scholar
  32. Pavlinek P. and Pickles J., 2000: Environmental Transitions: Transformation and Ecological Defence in Central and Eastern Europe. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  33. Peet R. and Watts M. (eds.), 1996: Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  34. Penin R., Traikov T. and Sultanova M., 1998: Geography of Bulgaria: Natural and Social-Demographic. Sofia.Google Scholar
  35. Petersen D.J., 1993: Troubled Lands: Environmental Pollution in the Former Soviet Union. UCLA/RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
  36. Perry III C. and Johnson A., 1997: Observations: Tourism Bansko. Business Centre 'Mesta', Razlog, Bulgaria.Google Scholar
  37. Pickles J. and Smith A. (eds.), 1998: Theorising Transition: the Political Economy of Postcommunist Transformations. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  38. Pred A., 1995: Recognising European Modernities: a Montage of the Rresent. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Pred A. and Watts M., 1993: Reworking Modernity: Capitalisms and Symbolic Discontent. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick.Google Scholar
  40. Raev I. and Grozev O., 2000: Forests, bioproductivity and climate change. In: Staneva M.P., Knight C.G., Hristov T.N. and Mishev D. (eds.), Global Change and Bulgaria. Centre for Integrated Regional Assessment, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.Google Scholar
  41. Randall J.E. and Ironside R.G., 1996: Communities on the edge: an economic geography of resource-dependent communities in Canada. Canadian Geographer 40(1): 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Razlog Employment Bureau, 2000: Statistics on Employment Trends in Bansko and Razlog Municipalities (in Bulgarian).Google Scholar
  43. O'Riordan T., 1989: The challenge for environmentalism. In: Peet R. and Thrift N. (eds.), New Models in Geography, vol. 1, Unwin Hyman, Boston, pp. 77–104.Google Scholar
  44. Rocheleau D., Thomas-Slayter B. and Wangari E. (eds.), 1996: Feminist Political Ecology: Global Issues and Local Experiences. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  45. Scott J., 1998: Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. Yale University Press, Yale.Google Scholar
  46. Staddon C., 1999: Economic marginalisation and natural resource management in Eastern Europe. The Geographical Journal 165(2): 200–208 (also published in Bulgarian, in Problemite v Geografia, 1999, #1).Google Scholar
  47. Staddon C., 2000: Restitution of forest property in post-communist Bulgaria. Natural Resources Forum 22(3).Google Scholar
  48. Staddon C., 2001: Restructuring the Bulgarian Wood Processing Sector: linkages between resource exploitation, capital accumulation and transition in a post-communist locality. Environment and Planning A 33(4): 607–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Staddon C. and Cellarius B., 2002: Paradoxes of conservation and development in postsocialist Bulgaria: recent controversies. European Environment 12: 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stark D., 1996: Recombinant property in Eastern European capitalism. American Journal of Sociology 101(4): 146–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stoyanov N., 1995: Restoration of property of forest lands and forest plantations in Bulgaria. In: Brandl H. (ed.), Private Forestry: Chances and Challenges for Countries in Transition. Ministerium fur Landlichen Raum, Ernahrung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten, Baden-Wurttemberg, pp. 78–83.Google Scholar
  52. Swyngedouw E., 1997: Neither global nor local: 'glocalisation' and the politics of scale'. In Cox K.R. (ed.), Spaces of Globalisation: Reasserting the Power of the Local. Guilford Press, New York, pp. 167–200.Google Scholar
  53. Warren M., 1995: The self in discursive democracy. In: White S.K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 167–200.Google Scholar
  54. Watts M.J., 1998: Recombinant capitalism: state, de-collectivisation and the agrarian question in Vietnam. In: Pickles J. and Smith A. (eds.), Theorising Transition: the Political Economy of Postcommunist Transformations. Routledge, London, pp. 450–505.Google Scholar
  55. Wilson J., 1997: Implementing forest policy change in British Columbia: comparing the experiences of the NDP governments of 1972–1975 and 1991–?. In: Barnes T. and Hayter R. (eds.), Trouble in the Rainforest: British Columbia's Forest Economy in Transition. Western Geographical Press, Vancouver, pp. 75–98.Google Scholar
  56. Wypych S., 1995: A few aspects of private forests management in the area of the regional directorate of the state forests (RDSF) Katowice. In: Brandl H. (ed.), Private Forestry: Chances and Challenges for Countries in Transition. Ministerium fur Landlichen Raum, Ernahrung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten, Baden-Wurttemberg, pp. 269–282.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caedmon Staddon
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Geography and Environmental Management, Faculty of the Built EnvironmentUniversity of the West of EnglandBristolU.K.

Personalised recommendations