Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Importance of Skewness and Kurtosis Statistical Tests for Outlier Detection and Elimination in Evaluation of Geochemical Reference Materials

  • Published:
Mathematical Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A common characteristic of concentration data compilations for geochemical reference materials (GRM) is a skewed frequency distribution because of aberrant analytical data. Rejection of outlying results usually is required to obtain a better estimate of mean concentration values. The present work describes the application of an approach, based on skewness and kurtosis statistical tests, to establish reliable concentration values in study of rare-earth element compilations for GRM. Frequency histograms of initial concentrations for these elements differ significantly from a normal distribution, as deduced from their skewness and kurtosis coefficients. The statistical procedure shows that rejection of outliers yields normal distributions which can be used to provide mean concentrations with smaller standard deviations for a large number of cases, although for many elements our %RSD are similar (within 5%) to literature values. This procedure has been applied to derive new concentration data for rare-earth elements in 26 GRM, which are compared with earlier compilations to show that the statistical procedure proposed here provides mean values with greater “quality value.” Although most present mean concentrations are similar (within 5%) to those reported in previous literature, some of them are significantly different (with differences of up to 40%) in a few GRM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abbey, S., 1981, The search for “best values”—a study of three Canadian rocks: Geostandards Newsletter, v. 5,no. 1, p. 13–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbey, S., 1992, Evaluation and application of reference materials for the analysis of rocks and minerals: Chemical Geology, v. 95,no. 1/2, p. 123–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbey, S., and Rousseau, R. M., 1985, Pragmatism vs. rigour: a debate on the resolution of disparate analytical data of four Canadian iron-formation reference samples: Geostandards Newsletter, v. 9,no. 1, p. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ando, A., Mita, N., and Terashima, S., 1987, 1986 values for fifteen GSJ rock reference samples: Geostandards Newsletter, v. 11,no. 2, p. 159–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dybczynski, R., 1980, Comparison of the effectiveness of various procedures for the rejection of outlying results and assigning consensus values in interlaboratory programs involving determination of trace elements or radionuclides: Analytica Chimica Acta, v. 117,no. 5, p. 53–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dybczynski, R., Tugsavil, A., and Suschny, O., 1979, Soil-5, a new IAEA certified reference material for trace element determinations: Geostandards Newsletter, v. 3,no. 1, p. 61–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, P. J., and Steele, T. W., 1982, Five robust indicators of central value: Geostandards Newsletter, v. 6,no. 2, p. 207–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbairn, H. W., 1951, A co-operative investigation of precision and accuracy on chemical, spectrochemical and model analysis of silicate rocks: U.S. Geol. Survey Bull. 980, 71 p.

  • Flanagan, F. J., ed., 1967, U.S. Geological Survey silicate rock standards: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 31,no. 3, p. 289–308.

  • Flanagan, F. J., ed., 1976, Description and analysis of eight new USGS rock standards: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 840, 192 p.

  • Flanagan, F. J., 1984, Three USGS mafic rock reference samples, W-2, DNC-1, BIR-1: U.S. Geol. Survey Bull. 1623, 54 p.

  • Flanagan, F. J., 1986, Reference samples in geology and geochemistry: Geostandards Newsletter, v. 10,no. 2, p. 191–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladney, E. S., and Roelandts, I., 1988a, 1987 compilation of elemental concentration data for USGS BIR-1, DNC-1 and W-2: Geostandards Newsletter, v. 12,no. 1, p. 63–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladney, E. S., and Roelandts, I., 1988b, 1987 compilation of elemental concentration data for USGS BHVO-1, MAG-1, QLO-1, RGM-1, SCo-1, SGR-1 and STM-1: Geostandards Newsletter, v. 12,no. 2, p. 253–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladney, E. S., and Roelandts, I., 1990, 1988 compilation of elemental concentration data for USGS geochemical exploration reference materials GXR-1 to GXR-6: Geostandards Newsletter, v. 14,no. 1, p. 21–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladney, E. S., Jones, E. A., Nickell, E. J., and Roelandts, I., 1990, 1988 compilation of elemental concentration data for USGS basalt BCR-1: Geostandards Newsletter, v. 14,no. 2, p. 209–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladney, E. S., Jones, E. A., Nickell, E. J., and Roelandts, I., 1991, 1988 compilation of elemental concentration data for USGS DTS-1, G-1, PCC-1 and W-1: Geostandards Newsletter, v. 15,no. 2, p. 199–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladney, E. S., Jones, E. A., Nickell, E. J., and Roelandts, I., 1992, 1988 compilation of elemental concentration data for USGS AGV-1, GSP-1 and G-2: Geostandards Newsletter, v. 16,no. 2, p. 111–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindaraju, K., 1980, Report (1980) on three GIT-IWG rock reference samples: anorthosite from Greenland, AN-G; basalte d'Essay-la-Côte, BE-N; granite de Beauvoir, MA-N: Geostandards Newsletter, v. 4,no. 1, p. 49–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindaraju, K., 1987, 1987 compilation on Ailsa Craig granite AC-E with the participation of 128 GIT-IWG laboratories: Geostandards Newsletter, v. 11,no. 2, p. 203–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindaraju, K., 1989, 1989 compilation of working values and sample description for 272 geostandards: Geostandards Newsletter, v. 13 (Special issue), p. 1–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindaraju, K., 1994, 1994 report on Whin Sill dolerite WS-E from England and Pitscurrie microgabbro PM-S from Scotland: assessment by one hundred and four international laboratories: Geostandards Newsletter, v. 18,no. 2, p. 211–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, M., and Wolfe, D. A., 1973, Nonparametric statistical methods: John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 455 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai, N., Terashima, S., Itoh, S., and Ando, A., 1995, 1994 compilation of analytical data for minor and trace elements in seventeen GSJ geochemical reference samples, “igneous rock series”: Geostandards Newsletter, v. 19,no. 2, p. 135–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itoh, S., Terashima, S., Imai, N., Kamioka, H., Mita, N., and Ando, A., 1993, 1992 Compilation of analytical data for rare-earth elements, scandium, yttrium, zirconium and hafnium in twenty-six GSJ reference samples: Geostandards Newsletter, v. 17,no. 1, p. 5–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, J. S., 1991, Derivation of recommended values: an opinion: Geostandards Newsletter, v. 15,no. 1, p. 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, B., 1982, Evaluation of analytical data: a practical guide for geoanalysts: Geostandards Newsletter, v. 6,no. 2, p. 175–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts, P. J., and Kane, J. S., 1992, Terminology for geological reference material values: a proposal to the International Organization for Standardisation (ISO), producers and users: Geostandards Newsletter, v. 16,no. 2, p. 333–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts, P. J., Tindle, A. G., and Webb, P. C., 1992, Geochemical Reference Material Compositions: Whittles Publishing Service, CRC Press Inc., Caithness, United Kingdom, 313 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollinson, H. R., 1993, Using geochemical data: evaluation, presentation, interpretation: Longman Scientific & Technical, Essex, 352 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoch, H., and Steele, T. W., 1978, Analyses, by several laboratories, of three ferromanganese slages: NIM South Africa Report 1965, 34 p.

  • Stoch, H., Steele, T. W., and Copelowitz, I., 1976, The establishment of preferred values for a series of rare-earth samples: NIM South Africa Report 1807, 35 p.

  • Sutarno, R., and Steger, H. F., 1985, Validation of accuracy by interlaboratory programme: Talanta, v. 32,no. 11, p. 1088–1091.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, S. P., 1996, Evaluation of accuracy in analytical geochemistry: Jour. Conference Abstracts, v. 1, p. 650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, S. P., and Velasco, F., 1997, Analytical methods for the determination of rare earth elements in geological materials and their statistical evaluation: Earth Sci. Reviews (Submitted).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Facultad de Ciencias de la Tierra, UANL, Apartado Postal 104, Linares, N.L. 67700, Mexico

    Fernando Velasco

  2. Centro de Investigación en Energia, UNAM, Apartado Postal 34, Temixco, Mor, 62580, Mexico

    Fernando Velasco & Surendra P. Verma

Authors
  1. Fernando Velasco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Surendra P. Verma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Velasco, F., Verma, S.P. Importance of Skewness and Kurtosis Statistical Tests for Outlier Detection and Elimination in Evaluation of Geochemical Reference Materials. Mathematical Geology 30, 109–128 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021717522790

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021717522790

Search

Navigation