Hydrobiologia

, Volume 483, Issue 1–3, pp 239–248 | Cite as

Surgical implantation of telemetry transmitters in fish: how much have we learned?

  • Niels Jepsen
  • Anders Koed
  • Eva B. Thorstad
  • Etienne Baras

Abstract

Surgical implantation has become a well-established method for attaching telemetry transmitters in studies of fish behaviour. However, a rather large number of reports of transmitter expulsion, fish mortality and adverse effects on fish physiology or behaviour, suggests that refinement and evaluation of the methods is needed, especially when tagging fish species for which no protocol has ever been assayed. This paper summarizes the authors' own experiences with telemetry transmitter implantation, primarily from field studies involving numerous species of fish. Where appropriate, results from existing literature are summarized and discussed. The paper focuses on how choice of surgical procedure, fish size, morphology, behaviour and environmental conditions can affect the success of telemetry transmitter implantation in fish.

telemetry tagging methods surgical procedures adverse effects 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aarestrup, K., N. Jepsen, G. Rasmussen, F. Økland, E. B. Thorstad & G. Holdensgaard, 2000. Prespawning migratory behaviour and spawning success of sea-ranched Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. in the River Gudenaa, Denmark. Fish. Mgmt Ecol. 7: 387-400.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, N. S., D. W. Rondorf, S. D. Evans, J. E. Kelly & R. W. Perry, 1998. Effects of surgically and gastrically implanted radio transmitters on swimming performance and predator avoidance of juvenile chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 55: 781-787.Google Scholar
  3. Alexander, R. M., 1966. Physical aspects of swim bladder function. Biol. Rev. 41: 141-176.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, C. D. & R. J. Roberts, 1975. A comparison of the effects of temperature on wound healing in a tropical and temperate teleost. J. Fish Biol. 7: 173-182.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, G., R. S. McKinley & M. Colavecchia, 1997. The use of clove oil as an anaesthetic for rainbow trout and its effects on swimming performance. North am. J. Fish. Mgmt 17: 301-307.Google Scholar
  6. Baras, E., 1991. A bibliography on underwater telemetry, 1956-1990. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. aquat. Sci. 1819: 1-55.Google Scholar
  7. Baras, E., 1992. Etude des stratégies d'occupation du temps et de l'espace chez le barbeau fluviatile, Barbus barbus (L.). [Time and space utilisation strategies in the common barbel, Barbus barbus (L.)]. Cahiers d'Ethologie 12(2-3): 318 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Baras, E., 1995. Thermal related variations of seasonal and daily spawning periodicity in Barbus barbus (L.). J. Fish Biol. 46: 915-917.Google Scholar
  9. Baras, E. & D. Jeandrain, 1998. Evaluation of surgery procedures for tagging eel Anguilla anguilla with telemetry transmitters. Hydrobiologia 371/372: 107-111.Google Scholar
  10. Baras, E., D. Jeandrain, B. Serouge & J. C. Philippart, 1998. Seasonal variations of time and space utilisation by radio-tagged yellow eels Anguilla anguilla in a small stream. Hydrobiologia 371/372: 187-198.Google Scholar
  11. Baras, E., & L. Westerloppe, 1999. Transintestinal expulsion of surgically implanted tags in African catfishes of different size and age. Trans. am. Fish. Soc. 128: 737-746.Google Scholar
  12. Baras, E., L. Westerloppe, C. Mélard, J. C. Philippart & V. Bénech, 1999. Evaluation of implantation procedures for PIT tagging juvenile Nile tilapia. N. Am. J. Aquacult. 61: 246-251.Google Scholar
  13. Baras E., C. Malbrouck, M. Houbart, P. Kestemont & C. Mélard, 2000. The effect of PIT tags on growth and some physiological factors of age-0 cultured Eurasian perch Perca fluviatilis of variable size. Aquaculture 185: 159-173.Google Scholar
  14. Baras, E., 2000. Day-night alternation prevails over food availability in synchronising the activity of Piaractus brachypomus (Characidae). Aquat. Living Resour. 13: 115-120.Google Scholar
  15. Baras, E., C. Birtles, L. Westerloppe, X. Thoreau, M. Ovidio, D. Jeandrain & J. C. Phillippart, in press. A critical review of surgery techniques for implanting telemetry devices into the body cavity of fish. In LeMaho, Y. & T. Zorn (eds), Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Wildlife Telemetry. CNRS/CEPE, Strasbourg, France: 12 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Bonath, K., 1977. Narkose der Reptilien, Amphibien und Fische. Berlin, Paul Parey: 148 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Block, B. A., H. Dewar, T. Williams, E. D. Prince, C. Farwell & D. Fudge, 1998. Archival tagging of Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus thynnus). Mar. Tech. Soc. 32: 37-46.Google Scholar
  18. Brown, R. S., S. J. Cooke, W. G. Anderson & R. S. McKinley, 1999. Evidence to challenge the ‘2% rule’ for biotelemetry. North am. J. Fish. Mgmt 19: 867-871.Google Scholar
  19. Bunnell, D. B., J. J. Isely, K. H. Burrell & D. H. Van Lear, 1998. Diel movement of brown trout in a Southern Appalachian River. Trans. am. Fish. Soc. 127: 630-636.Google Scholar
  20. Bunnell, D. B. & J. J. Isely, 1999. Influence of temperature on mortality and retention of simulated transmitters in rainbow trout. North am. J. Fish. Mgmt. 19: 152-154.Google Scholar
  21. Burrell, K. H., J. J. Isely, D. B. Bunnell, D. H. Van Lear & C. A. Dolloff, 2000. Seasonal movement of brown trout in a Southern Appalachian River. Trans. am. Fish. Soc. 129: 1373-1379.Google Scholar
  22. Carr, J., 2000. Atlantic salmon smolt migration patterns in the damimpacted St. John River system. In Moore, A. & I. Russell (eds), Advances in Fish Telemetry. CEFAS, Lowestoft, UK: 217-227.Google Scholar
  23. Chisholm, I. M. & W. A. Hubert, 1985. Expulsion of dummy transmitters by rainbow trout. Trans. am. Fish. Soc. 114: 766-767.Google Scholar
  24. Cooke, S. J. & C. M. Bunt, 2001. Assessment of internal and external antenna configurations of radio transmitters implanted in smallmouth bass. North am. J. Fish. Mgmt 21: 236-241.Google Scholar
  25. Eiler, J. H., 1990. Radio transmitters used to study salmon in glacial rivers. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 7: 364-369.Google Scholar
  26. Jacobsen, L., 1997. The structuring effect of submerged macrophytes on fish interactions in lakes. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Aarhus.Google Scholar
  27. Jepsen, N., K. Aarestrup, F. Økland & G. Rasmussen, 1998. Survival of radiotagged Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.)-and trout (Salmo trutta L.) smolts passing a reservoir during seaward migration. Hydrobiologia 371/372: 347-353.Google Scholar
  28. Jepsen, N. & K. Aarestrup, 1999. A comparison of the growth of radio-tagged and dye-marked pike. J. Fish Biol. 55: 880-883.Google Scholar
  29. Jepsen, N., A. Koed & F. Økland, 1999. The movements of pikeperch in a shallow reservoir. J. Fish Biol. 54: 1083-1093.Google Scholar
  30. Jepsen, N., S. Pedersen & E. Thorstad, 2000. Behavioural interactions between prey (trout smolts) and predators (pike and pikeperch) in an impounded river. Regulated Rivers: Res. Mgmt 16: 189-198.Google Scholar
  31. Jepsen, N., S. Beck, C. Skov & A. Koed, 2001a. Behaviour of pike (Esox lucius L.) >50 cm in a turbid reservoir and in a clearwater lake. Ecol. Freshwat. Fish 10: 26-34.Google Scholar
  32. Jepsen, N., L. E. Davis, C. B. Schreck & B. Siddens, 2001b. The physiological response of chinook salmon smolts to two methods of radio-tagging. Trans. am. Fish. Soc. 130: 495-500.Google Scholar
  33. Jepsen, N. & S. Berg, 2002. The use of winter refuges by roach tagged with miniature radio transmitters. Hydrobiologia 483/Dev. Hydrobiol. 165: 167-173.Google Scholar
  34. Kaseloo, P. A., A. H. Weatherly, J. Lotimer & M. D. Farina, 1992. A biotelemetry system recording fish activity. J. Fish Biol. 40: 165-179.Google Scholar
  35. Knights, B. C. & B. A. Lasee, 1996. Effects of implanted transmitters on adult bluegills at two temperatures. Trans. am. Fish. Soc. 125: 440-449.Google Scholar
  36. Koed, A. & E. B. Thorstad, 2001. Long-term effect of radio-tagging on the swimming performance of pikeperch. J. Fish Biol. 58: 1753-1756.Google Scholar
  37. Lefrancois, C., M. Odion & G. Claireaux, 2001. An experimental and theoretical analysis of the effect of added weight on the energetics and hydrostatic function of the swimbladder of European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Mar. Biol. 139: 13-17.Google Scholar
  38. Lucas, M. C., 1989. Effects of implanted dummy transmitters on mortality, growth and tissue reaction in rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri Richardson. J. Fish Biol. 35: 577-587.Google Scholar
  39. Lucas, M. C., in press. Recent advances in the use of telemetry and tracking applied to freshwater fishes. In Le Maho, Y. & T. Zorn (eds), Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Wildlife Telemetry. CNRS/CEPE, Strasbourg, France: 12 pp, in press.Google Scholar
  40. Martin, S. W., J. A. Long & T. N. Pearsons, 1995. Comparison of survival, gonad development, and growth between rainbow trout with and without surgically implanted dummy radio transmitters. North am. J. Fish. Mgmt 15: 494-498.Google Scholar
  41. Martinelli, T. L., H. C. Hansel & R. S. Shively, 1998. Growth and physiological responses to surgical and gastric radio-transmitter implantation techniques in subyearling chinook salmon. Hydrobiologia 371/372: 79-87.Google Scholar
  42. Marty, G. D. & R. C. Summerfelt, 1986. Pathways and mechanisms for expulsion of surgically implanted dummy transmitters from channel catfish. Trans. am. Fish. Soc. 115: 577-589.Google Scholar
  43. Marty, G. D. & R. C. Summerfelt, 1990. Wound healing in channel catfish by epithelialization and contraction of granulation tissue. Trans. am. Fish. Soc. 119: 145-150.Google Scholar
  44. McCleave, J. D. & K. A. Stred, 1975. Effect of dummy telemetry transmitters on stamina of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) smolts. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 32: 559-563.Google Scholar
  45. Moore, A., I. C. Russell & E. C. E. Potter, 1990. The effects of intraperitoneally implanted dummy acoustic transmitters on the behaviour and physiology of juvenile Atlantic salmon. J. Fish Biol. 37: 713-721.Google Scholar
  46. Moore, A., G. D. Pickett & D. R. Eaton, 1994. A preliminary study on the use of acoustic transmitters for tracking juvenile bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in an estuary. J. mar. Biol. Ass. UK 74: 451-454.Google Scholar
  47. Nemetz, T. G. & J. R. MacMillan, 1988.Wound healing of incisions closed with a cyanoacrylate adhesive. Trans. am. Fish. Soc. 117: 190-195.Google Scholar
  48. Nielsen, L. A. 1992. Methods of marking fish and shellfish. Am. Fish. Soc. Spec. Publ. 23, Bethesda, Maryland: 208 pp.Google Scholar
  49. Perry, R. W., N. S. Adams & D. W. Rondorf, 2001. Buoyancy compensation of juvenile Chinook salmon implanted with two different size dummy transmitters. Trans. am. Fish. Soc. 130: 46-52.Google Scholar
  50. Petering, R. W. & D. L. Johnson, 1991. Suitability of a cyanoacrylate adhesive to close incisions in black crappies used in telemetry studies. Trans. am. Fish. Soc. 120: 535-537.Google Scholar
  51. Prentice, E. F., T. A. Flagg & C. S. McCutcheon, 1990. Feasibility of using implantable passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags in salmonids. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 7: 317-322.Google Scholar
  52. Priede, I. G., 1992. Wildlife telemetry: an introduction. In Priede, I. G. & S.M. Swift (eds),Wildlife Telemetry-Remote Monitoring and Tracking of Animals. Ellis Horwood, London: 3-28.Google Scholar
  53. Prince, E. D. & O. E. Maughan, 1978. Ultrasonic telemetry technique for monitoring bluegill movement. Prog. Fish-Cult. 40: 90-93.Google Scholar
  54. Roberts, R. J., A. MacQueen, W. M. Shearer & H. Young, 1973. The histopathology of salmon tagging. I. The tagging lesion in newly tagged parr. J. Fish Biol. 5: 497-503.Google Scholar
  55. Ross, M. J. & J. H. McCormick, 1981. Effects of external radio transmitters on fish. Prog. Fish-Cult. 43: 67-72.Google Scholar
  56. Ross, M. J. & C. F. Kleiner, 1982. Shielded needle technique for surgically implanting radio-frequency transmitters in fish. Prog. Fish-Cult. 44: 41-43.Google Scholar
  57. Schreck, C. B., 2000. Accumulation and long-term effects of stress in fish. In Moberg, G. & J. Mench (eds), The Biology of Animal Stress. CABI Publishing, Wallingford: 147-158.Google Scholar
  58. Stasko, A. B. & D. E. Pincock, 1977. Review of underwater biotelemetry with emphasis on ultrasonic techniques. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 34: 1261-1285.Google Scholar
  59. Strange, R. J., C. B. Schreck & J. T. Golden, 1977. Corticoid stress responces to handling and temperature in salmonids. Trans. am. Fish. Soc. 106: 213-218.Google Scholar
  60. Summerfelt, R. C. & D. Mosier, 1984. Transintestinal expulsion of surgically implanted dummy transmitters by channel catfish. Trans. am. Fish. Soc. 113: 760-766.Google Scholar
  61. Summerfelt, R. C. & L. S. Smith, 1990. Anesthesia, surgery and related techniques. In Schreck, C. B. & P. B. Moyle (eds), Methods for Fish Biology. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland: 213-272.Google Scholar
  62. Thoreau, X. & E. Baras, 1997. Evaluation of surgery procedures for implanting telemetry transmitters into the body cavity of tilapia Oreochromis auretus. Aquat. Living Resour. 10: 207-211.Google Scholar
  63. Thorstad, E. B., F. Økland & T. G. Heggberget, 2001. Are long term negative effects from external tags underestimated?-Fouling of an externally attached telemetry transmitter. J. Fish Biol. 59: 1092-1094.Google Scholar
  64. Tyus, H. M., 1988. Long-term retention of implanted transmitters in Colorado squawfish and razorback sucker. N. am. J. Fish. Mgmt 8: 264-267.Google Scholar
  65. Wagner, G. N., E. D. Stevens & P. Byrne, 2000. Effects of suture type and patterns on surgical wound healing in rainbow trout. Trans. am. Fish. Soc. 129: 1196-1205.Google Scholar
  66. Walsh, M. G., A. K. Bjorgo & J. J. Isely, 2000. Effects of implantation method and temperature on mortality and loss of simulated transmitters in hybrid striped bass. Trans. am. Fish. Soc. 129: 539-544.Google Scholar
  67. Winter, J. D., 1996. Advances in Underwater biotelemetry. In Murphy, B. R. & D. W. Willis (eds), Fisheries Techniques, 2nd edn. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland: 555-590.Google Scholar
  68. Økland, F., E. B. Thorstad, R. S. McKinley, B. Finstad & R. K. Booth, 1996. Radio transmitted electromyogram (EMG) signals as indicators of physical activity in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). NINA·NIKU Project Report 002: 1-18.Google Scholar
  69. Økland, F., C. J. Hay, T. F. Næsje, E. B. Thorstad & N. Nickandor, 2001. Movements and habitat utilisation of radio tagged carp (Cyprinus carpio) in a reservoir in the Fish River, Namibia. NINA·NIKU Project Report 13: 1-28.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Niels Jepsen
    • 1
  • Anders Koed
    • 1
  • Eva B. Thorstad
    • 2
  • Etienne Baras
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Inland FisheriesDanish Institute for Fisheries, ResearchSilkeborgDenmark
  2. 2.Norwegian Institute for Nature ResearchTrondheimNorway
  3. 3.Tihange Aquaculture Research StationUniversity of Liège, Ethology & Animal PsychologyTihangeBelgium

Personalised recommendations