Abstract
This article considers whether the cities of Copenhagen, Denmark and Malmö, Sweden, recently joined by the Øresund bridge, ought to be considered as one binational city. Working from the assumption that the project of constructing this binational city is a top-down endeavor whose success ultimately rests on the degree of support it receives from regional inhabitants, I focus on public opinion survey data collected one year after the opening of the bridge. Analysis shows that there are sharp national differences in the amount of support for the construction of a binational greater metropolitan region. I discuss how these differences may lead to an asymmetrical development for the emerging binational city, with Malmö eclipsed by the Danish capital Copenhagen, as well as how the heavily multi-cultural population of Malmö can impact Danish-Swedish cooperation on the Øresund.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson B., 1991: Imagined Communities. Verso, London.
Anderson J. and O'Dowd L., 1999: Borders, border regions and territoriality: Contradictory meanings, changing significance. Regional Studies 33(7): 593–604.
Baud M. and van Schendel W., 1997: Toward a comparative history of borderlands. J. World Hist. 8(2): 211–242.
Berlingske Tidende, June 13, 2001: Malmø på vej mod invandrerflertal, Copenhagen.
Berlingske Tidende, June 24, 2001: Øresunds-vision er kuldsejlet, Copenhagen.
Billing P., 2000: Skildra världar? Malmös 1990-tal i ett kort historiskt perspektiv. Malmö Stad, Malmö.
Brubaker R. and Cooper F., 2000: Beyond ‘identity’. Theory and Society 29: 1–47.
Buursink J., 2002: The Binational Reality of Border ‘Twin’ Cities. Geo-Journal, this issue.
Deflem M. and Pampel F.C., 1996: The Myth of Postnational Identity: Popular Support for European Identification. Social Forces 75: 1.
Donnan H. and Wilson T.M., 1999: Borders: Frontiers of Identity, Nation and State. Berg, Oxford.
Duchesne S. and Frognier A., 1995: Is there a European identity? In: Niedermayer O. and Sinnot R. (eds), Public Opinion and Internationalized Governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Ehlers N. and Buursink J., 2000: Binational Cities: Peoples, Institutions, and Structures. In: van der Velde M. and van Houtum H. (eds), Borders, Regions, and People. Pion, London.
Ek R., 1998: Öresundsregionen som en simulerad verkilighet. In: Hur en region nybildas, pp. 177–180. Öresundsuniversitet, Lund.
Kaplan D.H., 2000: Conflict and compromise among borderland identities in Northern Italy. Tijdschr. Econom. en Soc. Geogr. 91(1): 44–60.
Laitin D., 1998: Identity in Formation: The Russian-Speaking Populations in the Near Abroad. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
Lecours A., 2000: Theorizing cultural identities: Historical institutionalism as a challenge to the culturalists. Can. J. Pol. Sci. 23(3): 499–522.
Löfgren O., 1999: Crossing borders: The nationalization of anxiety. Ethnologica Scandinavica 29: 5–27.
Murphy A., 1996: The sovereign State system as political-territorial ideal: Historical and contemporary considerations. In: Biersteker T.J. and Weber C. (eds), State Sovereignty as Social Construct. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Nilsson B., 2001: Internationalisation at home – A challenge for the future. Unpublished paper. Malmö University, Malmö.
Nilsson F., 2000: Insiders and outsiders. In: Berg P.O., Linde-Laursen A. and Löfgren O. (eds), Invoking a Transnational Metropolis: The Making of the Øresund Region. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
O'Dell T., 2000: Traversing the transnational. In: Berg P.O., Linde-Laursen A. and Löfgren O. (eds), Invoking a Transnational Metropolis: The Making of the Øresund Region. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
Paasi A., 1991: Deconstructing regions: Notes on the scales of spatial life. Environ. & Plann. 23: 239–256.
Paasi A., 1996: Territories, Boundaries and Consciousness: The Changing Geographies of the Finnish-Russian Border. Wiley and Sons, New York.
Politiken, July 18, 2001: Øresundstrafik på katastrofekurs, Copenhagen.
Politiken, December 1, 2001: Bertel Haarder vil levere varen, Copenhagen.
Rasmussen U.S. and Thomsen R., 1998: Hovedstadsregionen som entreprenør i den europæiske bykonkurrence. SAMS Research Reports, Copenhagen.
Riker W., 1982: Liberalism Against Populism. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco.
Rosenau J. 1997: Along the Domestic-Foreign Foreign Frontier. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Schack M., 2000: On The multicontextual character of border regions. In: van der Velde M. and van Houtum H. (eds), Borders, Regions, and People. Pion, London.
Schild J., 2001: National v. European identities? French and Germans in the European multi-level system. J. Common Market Studies 39(2): 331–351.
Smouts M., 1998: The region as the new imagined community? In: Le Gal's P. and Lequesne C. (eds), Regions in Europe. Routledge, London.
Sydsvenska Dagbladet, July 5, 2001: Förvirring kring inställda Sundståg, Malmö.
Sydsvenska Dagbladet, August 11, 2001: Danskar som inte skattar stöter rättskänslan, Malmö.
Sydsvenska Dagbladet, December 5, 2001: Genombrott för integrationen, Malmö.
Van Houtum H., 1998: The Development of Cross-Border Economic Relations. Tilburg University, Tilburg.
Van Houtum H., 1999: Internationalization and mental borders. Tijdschr. Econom. Soc. Geogr. 90(3): 329–335.
Weinstein B., 1983: The Civic Tongue: Political Consequences of Language Choices. Longman, New York.
Wilson T.M., 1996: Sovereignty, identity and borders: Political Anthropology and European integration. In: O'Dowd L. and Wilson T.M. (eds), Borders, Nations and States. Avebury, Aldershot.
Öresundskomiteen, 1999: Mötesplats Öresund. Regional identitet i Öresundsregionen – förutsättningar och erfarenheter. Copenhagen.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bucken-Knapp, G. Just a train-ride away, but still worlds apart: Prospects for the Øresund region as a binational city. GeoJournal 54, 51–60 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021188631424
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021188631424