Advertisement

Mathematical Geology

, Volume 34, Issue 7, pp 783–796 | Cite as

Area Influence Kriging

  • Abdullah Arik
Article

Abstract

This paper presents a modified ordinary kriging technique referred to as the “Area Influence Kriging” (AIK). The method is a simple and practical tool to use for more accurate prediction of global recoverable ore resources in any type of deposit. AIK performs well even in deposits with skewed grade distributions when the ordinary kriging (OK) results are unreasonably smooth. It is robust and globally unbiased like OK. The AIK method is not intended to replace OK, which is a better estimator of the average grade of the blocks. Rather it aims to complement OK with its excellent performance in predicting recoverable resources that have been the major pitfalls of OK in many resource estimation cases. The paper details the methodology of AIK with a couple of examples. It also reports the results from its application to a gold deposit.

kriging recoverable ore reserves global recoverable resources area of influence geostatistical methods reconciliation of reserves 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Arik, A., 1990, Effects of search parameters on kriged reserve estimates: Int. J. Min. Geol. Eng., v. 8, no. 12, p. 305–318.Google Scholar
  2. Arik, A., 1992, Outlier restricted kriging: A new kriging algorithm for handling of outlier high grade data in ore reserve estimation, inKim, Y. C. (ed), APCOM Proceedings: Port City Press, Baltimore, p. 181–187.Google Scholar
  3. Arik, A., 1998, Nearest neighbor kriging: A solution to control the smoothing of kriged estimates, inSME Annual Meeting, Orlando, Florida. Preprint#98-73.Google Scholar
  4. Dagdelen, K., Verly, G., and Coskun, B., 1997, Conditional simulation for recoverable reserve estimation, inSME Annual Meeting, Denver, Colorado. Preprint#97-201.Google Scholar
  5. David, M., 1977, Geostatistical ore reserve estimation: Elsevier, Amsterdam, p. 364.Google Scholar
  6. Deutsch, C. V., and Journel, A. G., 1992, GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide: Oxford University Press, New York, p. 369.Google Scholar
  7. Dowd, P. A., 1982, Lognormal kriging the general case: Math. Geol., v. 14, no. 5 p. 475–499.Google Scholar
  8. Isaaks, E. H., and Srivastava, R. M., 1989, Applied geostatistics: Oxford University Press, New York, p. 561.Google Scholar
  9. Journel, A. G., 1989, Ademocratic research impetus, NACOG Geostatistics Newsletter 3, Summer, p. 5.Google Scholar
  10. Journel, A. G., and Arik, A., 1988, Dealing with outlier high grade data in precious metals deposits, inProceedings, computer applications in the mineral industry: Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, p. 161–171.Google Scholar
  11. Parker, H. M., 1980, The volume-variance relationship: A useful tool for mine planning, inRoyle, A. G., ed., Geostatistics: McGraw Hill, New York, p. 61–91.Google Scholar
  12. Rossi, M. E., Parker, H. M., and Roditis, Y. S., 1994, Evaluation of existing geostatistical models and new approaches in estimating recoverable reserves, inSME Annual Meeting, Albuquerque, New Mexico. Preprint#94-322.Google Scholar
  13. Verly, G. W., and Sullivan, J. A., 1985, Multigaussian and probability kriging, application to Jerritt Canyon deposit, Mining Eng, v. 37, p. 568–574.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geology 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abdullah Arik
    • 1
  1. 1.Mintec, IncTucson

Personalised recommendations