Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of the Code Civil in the Netherlands

  • Published:
European Journal of Law and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The subject of this paper is the influence of the Code Civil in the Netherlands. First, the history of the codification in the Netherlands is examined. Then, attention is paid to the Burgerlijk Wetboek (BW) of 1838, the predecessor of the Dutch civil code of the present day. It is investigated whether this BW is a copy of the Code Civil or a work on its own. Within this framework, the reasons why the Code Civil had an extraordinary influence are shortly mentioned. Finally it is explained how this BW has developed to our BW of 1992. The Code Civil was the model for the BW of 1838. This does not mean that the BW is a copy of the Code. It was not simply a translation. The BW is influenced by the Code Civil, but this does not justify the view that the Netherlands adopted French law. On the contrary: some French rules were removed. Former Dutch law was inserted instead of the French rules or as a supplement to the BW. A large part of the Code is based on joint roots, and the most important common background is Roman law. Those rules cannot be qualified as French law. Besides this there are also typical French provisions, some originated by the French Revolution. With regard to this rules the question is whether these are French rules or universal rights. It can be argued that the BW of 1838 is an improved version of the Code Civil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asser, C. (1838). Het Nederlandsch Burgerlijk Wetboek vergeleken met het Wetboek Napoleon. Nagelaten werk van C. Asseruitgegeven door L. Asser en C.D. Assers Gravenhage en Amsterdam: De Gebroeders van Cleef.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asser, C. & Scholten, P. (1931).Handleiding tot de beoefening van het Nederlandsch burgerlijk recht. Algemeen deel door P. Scholten. Zwolle: Tjeenk Willink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asser, C. & Scholten, P. (1974). derde druk: Hoofdstuk III; Het Burgerlijk Wetboek en zijn geschiedenis, pp. 223–250.

  • de Groot, H. (1631).Inleidinghe tot de Hollandsche Rechts-geleertheydts Gravenhage: Wed. Hillebrant Jacobsz. van Wou.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milo, J. (1997). Hetrechtsvergelijkende argument in de ontwikkeling van het Nederlandse vermogensrecht 1838- 1940: aansprakelijkheid voor zaken, art. 2014, publiek domein en de relativiteit van de onrechtmatige daad, Antwerpen: Intersentia, Hoofdstuk 3, pp. 29–37. De tekst van het BW als uitgangspunt:1838.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Kan, J. (1938). “Het BurgerlijkWetboek en de Code Civil.” In P. Scholten & E.M. Meijers (ed.), GedenkboekBurgerlijk Wetboek 1838-1938, Zwolle: Tjeenk Willink, pp. 243–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Lunteren, A. S. (1928, 2). Overzicht van deGeschiedenis der Romeinsche en Oud-Nederlandsche Rechtsvorming, Groningen-Den Haag: Wolters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwalve, W. J. (1993). Hoofdstukkenuit de geschiedenis van het Europese privaatrecht, Groningen: Wolters Noordhoff. Hoofdstuk VII: Codificatie in Nederland, pp. 243–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zweigert, K. & Kötz, H. (1977). An Introduction to Comparative Law, I. The Framework, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 78–111.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meijer, G., Meijer, S.Y. Influence of the Code Civil in the Netherlands. European Journal of Law and Economics 14, 227–236 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020780914470

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020780914470

Navigation