Skip to main content
Log in

What Is the Best Strategy for Using Embryos and Presenting Results in Assisted Reproductive Technology? A Strategy for Valid Comparisons of Results

  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Lancaster PA: Registers of in-vitro fertilization and assisted conception. Hum Reprod 1996;11(Suppl 4):89-104

    Google Scholar 

  2. Check JH, Lurie D, Callan C, Baker A, Benfer K: Comparison of the cumulative probability of pregnancy after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer by infertility factor and age. Fertil Steril 1994;61:257-261

    Google Scholar 

  3. Giorgetti C, Terriou P, Auquier P, Hans E, Spach JL, Salzmann J, Roulier R: Embryo score to predict implantation after in-vitro fertilization: based on 957 single embryo transfers. Hum Reprod 1995;10:2427-2431

    Google Scholar 

  4. Roseboom TJ, Vermeiden JP, Schoute E, Lens JW, Schats R: The probability of pregnancy after embryo transfer is affected by the age of the patient, cause of infertility, number of embryos transferred and the average morphology score, as revealed by multiple logistic regression analysis. Hum Reprod 1995;10:3035-3041

    Google Scholar 

  5. Van-Steirteghem AC, Nagy Z, Joris H, Liu J, Staessen C, Smitz J, Wisanto A, Devroey P: High fertilization and implantation rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1993;8:1061-1066

    Google Scholar 

  6. Palermo GD, Cohen J, Alikani M, Adler A, Rosenwaks Z: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: A novel treatment for all forms of male factor infertility. Fertil Steril 1995,63:1231-1240

    Google Scholar 

  7. Payne D, Matthews CD: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection—Clinical results from the reproductive medicine unit, Adelaide. Reprod Fert Dev 1995;7:219-227

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bonduelle M, Wilikens A, Buysse A, Van-Assche E, Wisanto A, Devroey P, Van-Steirteghem AC, Liebaers I: Prospective follow-up study of 877 children born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), with ejaculated epididymal and testicular spermatozoa and after replacement of cryopreserved embryos obtained after ICSI. Hum Reprod 1996;11(Suppl 4):131-55

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT, Serour GI, Amin YM, Kamal A: Prospective controlled randomized study of in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the treatment of tubal factor infertility with normal semen parameters. Fertil Steril 1996;66:753-756

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bero L, Rennie, D: The Cochrane Collaboration. Preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care. JAMA 1995;274:1935-1938

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hughes EG: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Semin Reprod Endocrinol 1996;14:161-169

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flaherty, S.P., Payne, D. & Norman, R.J. What Is the Best Strategy for Using Embryos and Presenting Results in Assisted Reproductive Technology? A Strategy for Valid Comparisons of Results. J Assist Reprod Genet 16, 471–473 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020594815171

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020594815171

Navigation