Advertisement

Conservation Genetics

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 363–374 | Cite as

Genetic population structure of the Dakota skipper (Lepidoptera: Hesperia dacotae): A North American native prairie obligate

  • Hugh B. BrittenEmail author
  • Joseph W. Glasford
Article

Abstract

A range-wide survey of Dakotaskipper (Hesperia dacotae) populationsassessed levels of genetic variability andgeographic scale of population structure inthis species of conservation concern. Thisspecies exists on isolated patches of nativetall- and mixed-grass prairie within a highlymodified landscape dominated by agriculture. It has been extirpated from the southernportion of its range and has sufferedrange-wide declines. Nine populations weresampled from western Minnesota, eastern SouthDakota, and southern Manitoba. Starch gelelectrophoresis was used to resolve 21 isozymeloci in 278 Dakota skippers. Dakota skipperpopulations were approximately as variable asother lepidopterans found in isolated habitats. Genetic distances indicated that Manitobapopulations were somewhat distinct from ones inMinnesota and South Dakota. Isolation-by-distance was detected range-wideand among the seven southern-most populations. Genetically effective immigration rates weresmall at both range-wide and regional scalesand effective populations sizes were lowsuggesting that Dakota skipper populations aregenetically isolated from one another, althoughthey were likely more connected in the recentpast. Genotype assignment tests revealed twoclusters of populations in Minnesota and SouthDakota that were not apparent from theisolation-by-distance results. Significantheterozygote deficiencies relative toHardy-Weinberg expectations and high inbreedingcoefficients suggest structure within samplelocations. Management recommendations includethe maximization of effective population sizein each Dakota skipper population to offset theeffects of drift and habitat corridors in somecases. Habitat management should consider thewithin-site population structure and possibletemporal population structure detected in thisstudy.

Allozymes gene flow isolation by distance Lepidoptera 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allendorf FW, Leary RF (1986) Heterozygosity and fitness in natural populations of animals. In: Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity (ed. Soulé ME), pp. 57–76. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  2. Andersen LW, Holm L-E, Siegismund HR, Clausen B, Kinze CC, Loeschicke V (1997) A combined DNA-microsatellite and isozyme analysis of the population structure of the harbour porpoise in Danish waters and West Greenland. Hered., 78, 270–276.Google Scholar
  3. Avise JC (1996) Introduction: The scope of conservation genetics. In: Conservation Genetics: Case Studies from Nature (eds. Avise JC, Hamrick JL), pp. 1–9. Chapman & Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Beerli P, Felsenstein J (1999) Maximum-likelihood of migration rates and effective population numbers in two populations using a coalescent approach. Genetics, 152, 763–773.Google Scholar
  5. Beerli P, Felsenstein J (2001) Maximum likelihood estimation of a migration matrix and effective population sizes in n subpopulations using a coalescent approach. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA), 98, 4563–4568.Google Scholar
  6. Britten HB (1996) Meta-analyses of the association between multilocus heterozygosity and fitness. Evolution, 50, 2158–2164.Google Scholar
  7. Britten HB, Baker RJ (2002) Landscape connections and genetic diversity. In: Applying Landscape Ecology in Biological Conservation (ed. Gutzwiller KJ). Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  8. Britten HB, Brussard PF (1992) Genetic divergence and the Pleistocene history of the alpine butterfly Boloria improba (Nymphalidae) and the endangered Boloria acrocnema (Nymphalidae) in western North America. Can. J. Zool., 70, 539–548.Google Scholar
  9. Britten HB, Brussard PF, Murphy DD, Austin GT (1994a) Colony isolation and isozyme variability in the western seep fritillary, Speyeria nokomis apacheana (Nymphalidae), in the western Great Basin. Great Basin Nat., 54, 97–105.Google Scholar
  10. Britten HB, Brussard PF, Murphy DD (1994b) The pending extinction of the Uncompahgre fritillary butterfly. Con. Biol., 8, 86–94.Google Scholar
  11. Britten HB, Brussard PF, Murphy DD, Ehrlich PR (1995) A test for isolation-by-distance in central Rocky Mountain and Great Basin populations of the checkerspot butterfly Euphydryas editha. J. Hered., 86, 204–210.Google Scholar
  12. Brittnacher JG, Sims SR, Ayala FJ (1978) Genetic differentiation between species of the genus Speyeria (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Evolution, 32, 199–210.Google Scholar
  13. Brussard PF, Baughman JF, Murphy DD, Ehrlich PR, Wright J (1989) Complex population differentiation in checkerspot butterflies (Euphydryas spp.). Can. J. Zool., 67, 330–335.Google Scholar
  14. Collins MM, Britten HB, Rivers V (1993) An allozyme analysis of a known hybrid zone between Hyalophora euryalis and H. gloveri (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) in the Sierra Nevada. J. Res. Lepid., 32, 79–88.Google Scholar
  15. Cornuet J-M, Piry S, Luikart G, Estoup A, Solignac M (1999) New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origins of individuals. Genetics, 153, 1989–2000.Google Scholar
  16. Dana RP (1991) Conservation management of the prairie skippers Hesperia dacotae and Hesperia ottoe. Station Bulletin 594-1991. Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station. University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota.Google Scholar
  17. Dana RP (1997) Characterization of three Dakota skipper sites in Minnesota. Report for Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program, St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
  18. Fleishman E (1998) Ecology and conservation of the Apache silverspot butterfly. Report submitted to the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest, NV.Google Scholar
  19. Frankel OH, Soulé ME (1981) Conservation and Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  20. Frankham, R (1995) Effective population size/adult population size ratios in wildlife: A review. Genet. Res., 66, 95–107.Google Scholar
  21. Hartl DL, Clark AG (1997) Principles of Population Genetics, 3rd edn. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  22. Hedrick PW, Miller PS (1992) Conservation genetics: Techniques and fundamentals. Ecol. Apps., 2, 30–46.Google Scholar
  23. Lande R (1988) Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science, 241, 1455–1460.Google Scholar
  24. Manly BFJ (1991) Randomization and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  25. May B (1992) Starch gel electrophoresis of allozymes. In: Molecular Genetic Analysis of Populations: A Practical Approach (ed. Hoezel AR), pp. 1–28. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  26. McCabe TL (1981) The Dakota skipper, Hesperia dacotae (Skinner): Range and biology, with special reference to North Dakota. J. Lep. Soc., 35, 179–193.Google Scholar
  27. Miller MP (1997) Tools for population genetic analyses (TFPGA) 1.3: A Windows program for the analysis of allozyme and molecular population genetic data. Computer software distributed by author.Google Scholar
  28. Mills LS, Allendorf FW (1996) The one-migrant-per-generation rule in conservation and management. Cons. Biol., 10, 1509–1518.Google Scholar
  29. Nei M (1978) Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics, 89, 583–590.Google Scholar
  30. Paetkau D, Shields GF, Strobeck C (1998) Gene flow between insular, coastal and interior populations of brown bears in Alaska. Molec. Gen., 7, 1283–1292.Google Scholar
  31. Rannala B, Mountain JL (1997) Detecting immigration by using multilocus genotypes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 9197–9201.Google Scholar
  32. Saccheri I, Kuussaari M, Kankare M, Vikman P, Fortelius W, Hanski I (1998) Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 392, 491–494.Google Scholar
  33. Samson F, Knopf F (1994) Prairie conservation in North America. BioSci., 44, 418–421.Google Scholar
  34. Scott JA (1986) The Butterflies of North America: A Natural History and Field Guide. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  35. Slatkin M (1993) Isolation by distance in equilibrium and nonequilibrium populations. Evolution, 47, 264–279.Google Scholar
  36. Sunnucks P (2000) Efficient genetic markers for population biology. TREE, 15, 199–203.Google Scholar
  37. Swofford DL, Selander RB (1981) BIOSYS-1: A FORTRAN program for the comprehensive analysis of electrophoretic data in population genetics and evolution. J. Hered., 72, 281–283.Google Scholar
  38. Waser PM, Strobeck C (1998) Genetic signatures of interpopulation dispersal. TREE, 13, 43–44.Google Scholar
  39. Weir BS (1996) Genetic Data Analysis II. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of South DakotaVermillionUSA (Author for correspondence: Phone

Personalised recommendations