Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 25, Issue 5, pp 469–476 | Cite as

Effects of Anonymous Information About Potential Organ Transplant Recipients on Attitudes Toward Organ Transplantation and the Willingness to Donate Organs

  • Michelle Singh
  • Roger C. Katz
  • Kenneth Beauchamp
  • Roseann Hannon

Abstract

Two approaches for educating college students about the need for organ donors were compared. The experimental group (N = 162) watched a videotaped dramatization of an organ procurement coordinator asking the family members of a recently deceased loved one if they would donate their loved one's organs. Contained in this videotape was demographic information about three adults who needed an organ transplant. The control group (N = 169) saw the same videotape minus the demographic information. Extrapolating from research on altruism, we hypothesized that information about potential organ recipients would increase the viewer's willingness to donate a next-of-kin's organs and their own willingness to become an organ donor. Results supported this hypothesis. Compared to the control group, the experimental group was more willing to donate a next-of-kin's organs and take action to become an organ donor. We tentatively conclude that providing information about potential organ recipients increases the willingness of college students to become organ donors.

education about organ donation organ transplantation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Batson, C., Duncan, B., Ackerman, P., Buckley, T., and Birch, K. (1981). Is empathic emotion a source of altruistic motivation? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 40: 290–302.Google Scholar
  2. Conrad, S. (1998). Transplant Video Journal [Video: Spring 1998, No. 6].Google Scholar
  3. Cosse, T., and Weisenberger, T. (2000). Words versus actions about organ donation:Afour-year study of attitudes and self-reported behavior. J. Bus. Res. 50: 297–303.Google Scholar
  4. Cosse, T., Weisenberger, T., and Taylor, G. (1997). Walking the walk: Behavior shifts to match attitudes toward organ donation. Richmond, VA, 1994‐1996. Transplant. Proc. 29: 3248.Google Scholar
  5. Dialysis Clinic Incorporated (1992). Get With It: Teen Perspectives on Organ Donation, DCI Video, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
  6. Gallup Organization (1993). The American public's attitude toward organ donation and transplantation: A Gallup survey for the partnership for organ donation, Feb., 1993.Google Scholar
  7. Horton, R., and Horton, R. (1990). Knowledge regarding organ donation: Identifying and overcoming barriers to organ donation. Soc. Sci. Med. 31: 791–300.Google Scholar
  8. Horton, R. and Horton, R. (1991). A model of willingness to become a potential organ donor. Soc. Sci. Med. 33: 1037–1054.Google Scholar
  9. Martinelli, A. (1993). Organ donation: Barriers, religious aspects. AORD J. 58: 236–252.Google Scholar
  10. McNatt, G. (1992). Testimony: Controversies in organ donation. ANNA J., 19: 341–354.Google Scholar
  11. Morris, J., Wilcox, T., and Frist, W. (1992). Pediatric organ donation. The paradox of organ shortage despite the remarkable willingness of families to donate. Pediatrics 89: 411–415.Google Scholar
  12. Parisi, N., and Katz, I. (1986). Attitudes toward posthumous organ donation and commitment to donate. Health Psychol. 6: 565–580.Google Scholar
  13. Radecki, C., and Jaccard, J. (1997). Psychological aspects of organ donation. A critical review and synthesis of individual and next-of-kin donation decisions. Health Psychol. 16: 183–195.Google Scholar
  14. Sanner, M. (2001) Exchanging spare parts or becoming a new person? People's attitudes toward receiving and donating organs. Soc. Sci. Med. 52: 1491–1499.Google Scholar
  15. Schaller, M., and Cialdini, R. (1988). The economics of empathic helping: Support for a mood management motive. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 24: 163–181.Google Scholar
  16. Slapak, M. (1997). Organ donation: Transplant Games, The “Island Effect” and other successful methods. Transplant. Proc. 29: 3047–3049.Google Scholar
  17. United Network for Organ Sharing (2000). Annual Report of the U.S. Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients and the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network: Transplant Data: 1990‐1999,U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Office of Special Programs, Division of Transplantation, Rockville, MD.Google Scholar
  18. Wolf, J., Servino, E., and Nathan, H. (1997). National strategy to develop public acceptance of organ and tissue donation. Transplant. Proc. 29: 1477–1478.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michelle Singh
    • 1
  • Roger C. Katz
  • Kenneth Beauchamp
    • 1
  • Roseann Hannon
    • 1
  1. 1.University of the PacificStockton

Personalised recommendations