Skip to main content
Log in

GLB + T?: Gender/Sexuality Movements and Transgender Collective Identity (De)Constructions

  • Published:
International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies

Abstract

In the United States during the 1990s, there emerged a “new” form of collective political organizing and action around “transgender” identity. In this essay, the author depicts the dynamics of transgender activism during the mid-1990s based on original research in the form of a postmodern ethnography of transgender activism. Using data from field research, interviews, and observation, the author illustrates the way that “transgender” activism was characterized by simultaneous claims to a shared “transgender” quasi-ethnic identity and the complications thereof. In particular, the author details transgender social movement processes of identity—both processes of collective identity construction and deconstruction—demonstrating that transgender politics are not simply identity politics nor deconstructive (queer) politics. Using constructionist social movement literature, the author argues that in sexuality/gender studies we must expand our understanding of “identity politics” in order to understand the simultaneity of constructions and deconstructions of identity and gender/sexuality movements today.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bornstein, K. (1994). Gender outlaw: On men, women, and the rest of us. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, K. (1998). My gender workbook. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bristow, J. and Wilson, A. R. (1993). Activating theory: Lesbian, gay, bisexual politics. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Califia, P. (1997). Sex changes: The politics of transgenderism. San Francisco, California: Cleis Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, L. (1996). Body alchemy: Transsexual portraits. San Francisco, California: Cleis Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (1998). Fighting words: Black women and the search for justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cromwell, J. (1999). Transmen and FTMs: Identities, bodies, genders, and sexualities. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devor, H. (1989). Gender blending: Confronting the limits of duality. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, L. (1996). Transgender warriors. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, A. (1994). Ethnographic trends in the postmodern era. In D. R. Dickens and A. Fontana (Eds.), Postmodernism & social inquiry (pp. 203–233). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, D. and McAdam, D. (1992). Collective identity and activism: Networks, choices, and the life of a social movement. In A. D. Morris and C. M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagne, P., Tewksbury, R, and McGaughey, D. (1997). Coming out and crossing over: Identity formation and proclamation in a transgender community. Gender & Society, 11(4).

  • Gagne, P. and Tewksbury, R. (1998). Conformity pressures and gender resistance among transgendered individuals. Social Problems, 45(1).

  • Gamson, J. (1995). Must identity movements self-destruct?: A queer dilemma. In P. M. Nardi and B. E. Schneider (Eds.), Social perspectives in lesbian and gay studies (pp. 589–604). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, J. (1998). Suggested rules for non-transsexuals writing about transsexuals, transsexuality, transsexualism, or Tran—. Sandy Stone's Home Page, http://www.actlab.utexas.edu/∼sandy/hale.rules.html.

  • Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science questions in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14: 575–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartsock, N. (1987). The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In S. Harding (Ed.), Feminism & methodology (pp. 157–180). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. A. and Benford, R. D., Snow, D. A. (1994). Identity fields: Framing processes and the social construction of movement identities. In E. Larana, H. Johnston, and J. R. Gusfield (Eds.), New social movements: From ideology to identity. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H., Larana, E., and Gusfield, J. R. (1994). Identities, grievances, and new social movements. In E. Larana, H. Johnston, and J. R. Gusfield (Eds.), New social movements: From ideology to identity (pp. 1–27). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, S. J. (1990). The medical construction of gender: Case management of intersexed infants. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, Autumn.

  • Kessler, S. J. and McKenna, W. (1978). Gender: An ethnomethodological approach. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klandermans, B. (1994). Transient identities? Membership patterns in the Dutch peace movement. In E. Larana, H. Johnston, and J. R. Gusfield (Eds.), New social movements: From ideology to identity. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemert, C. (1995). Sociology after the crisis. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorber, J. and Ferrell, S. A. (Eds.). (1991). The social construction of gender. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melucci, A. (1995). The process of collective identity. In H. Johnston and B. Klandermans (Eds.), Social movements and culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes: Collective action in the information age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, A. D. and Mueller, C. M. (Eds.). (1992). Frontiers in social movement theory. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, C. M. (1992). Building a social movement theory. In A. D. Morris and C. M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 3–26). New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Namaste, K. (1996). Tragic misreadings: Queer theory's erasure of transgender subjectivity. In B. Beemyn and M. Eliason (Eds.). Queer studies: A lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender anthology (pp. 183–203). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nangeroni, N. R. (1996). SRS tomorrow: The physical continuum. In B. Bullough, V. L. Bullough, and J. Elias (Eds.), Gender blending (pp. 344–351). New York: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, S. (1994). Getting specific: Postmodern lesbian politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porta, D. D. and Diani, M. (1999). Social movements: An introduction. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, J. (1980). The transsexual empire. London: The Women's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, J. (1996). The politics of transgenderism. In R. Ekins and D. King (Eds.), Blending genders: Social aspects of cross-dressing and sex-changing (pp. 215–223). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, G. S. 1993. Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In H. Abelove, M. A. Barale, and D. M. Halperin, The lesbian and gay studies reader (pp. 3–44). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, L. J. and Taylor, V. (1999). Forging feminist identity in an international movement: A collective identity approach to twentieth-century feminism. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 24(1): 363–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, S. (1994). Contested knowledge: Social theory in the postmodern era. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, S. (1997). Difference troubles: Queering social theory and sexual politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D. A. and McAdam, D. (2000). Identity work processes in the context of social movements: Clarifying the identity/movement nexus. In S. Stryker, T. J. Owens, and R. W. White (Eds.), Self, identity, and social movements (pp. 41–67) Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, A. (1992). Sisters and queers: The decentering of lesbian feminism. In P. M. Nardi and B. E. Schneider (Eds.), Social perspectives in lesbian and gay studies (pp. 553–563). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, S. (1991). The “empire” strikes back: A posttranssexual manifesto. K. Straub and J. Epstein (Eds.), Body guards: The cultural politics of gender ambiguity (pp. 121–142). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, V. and Whittier, N. E. (1992). Collective identity in social movement communities: Lesbian feminist mobilization. In P. M. Nardi and B. E. Schneider (Eds.), Social perspectives in lesbian and gay studies (pp. 349–365). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilchins, R. A. (1997). Read my lips: Sexual subversion and the end of gender. New York: Firebrand Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Broad, K.L. GLB + T?: Gender/Sexuality Movements and Transgender Collective Identity (De)Constructions. International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies 7, 241–264 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020371328314

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020371328314

Navigation