Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 177–189 | Cite as

Weight Discrimination in the American Workplace: Ethical Issues and Analysis

  • Mark V. Roehling
Article

Abstract

Research providing consistent evidence of pervasive discrimination against overweight job applicants and employees in the American workplace raises important questions for organizational stakeholders. To what extent is the disparate treatment of job applicants or employees based on their weight ethically justified? Are there aspects of weight discrimination that make it more acceptable than discrimination based on other characteristics, such as race or gender? What operational steps can employers take to address concerns regarding the ethical treatment of overweight individuals in the workplace? This article investigates these and related questions. Its purpose is to provide information and analysis that will assist organizations in formulating ethical responses to a widespread phenomenon: weight discrimination in the workplace. Although its focus is the American workplace, the proposed employer ethical obligations and the practical guidance that is provided are viewed as generalizing across countries and cultures.

employment law equal opportunity obesity weight discrimination 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bellizzi, J. A., M. L. Klassen and J. J. Belonax: 1989, ‘Stereotypical Beliefs About Overweight and Smoking and Decision Making in Assignments to Sales Territories’, Perceptual and Motor Skills 69, 419-429.Google Scholar
  2. Buckholz, R.A. and S. B. Rosenthal: 1998, Business Ethics: The Pragmatic Path Beyond Principles to Process(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  3. Burg, F. M.: 1999, ‘Health Risks Associated With Weight Discrimination in the American Workplace187 Weight Loss and Obesity Treatment Programs’, Journal of Social Issues 55(2), 277-297.Google Scholar
  4. Burton, W. N., C.Y. Chen, A. B. Schultz and D. W. Edington: 1998, ‘The Economic Costs Associated With Body Mass Index in a Workplace’, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 40(9), 786-92.Google Scholar
  5. Cogan, J. C.: 1999, ‘A National Health Agenda: Providing the Public With Accurate Information’, Journal of Social Issues 55(2), 383-400. Cook v.Rhode Island Department of Mental Health, 10 F.2d 17; 2 AD 1476 (1st Cir. 1993).Google Scholar
  6. Crawley, J.: 2001, ‘Body Weight and Women's Labor Market Outcomes’, Joint Center for Poverty Research Summaries 2(1).Google Scholar
  7. Diaz v.Pan American World Airways, Inc., 442 F.2d 385 (5th Cir. 1971).Google Scholar
  8. EEOC Amicus Brief, 10 F.2d 17 (1st Cir. 1993), reprinted in Americans with Disabilities Act Manual (BNA) No. 23, 100:7057 (Dec. 1993).Google Scholar
  9. Francis v.City of Meriden, 129 F.3d 281; 7 AD Cases 955 (CA 2 1997).Google Scholar
  10. Frank v.United Airlines, 256 F.3d 845 (9th Cir. 2000).Google Scholar
  11. Gaesser, G. A.: 1996, Big Fat Lies: The Truth About Your Weight and Your Health(Fawcett Columbine, New York).Google Scholar
  12. Gatewood, R. D. and A. B. Carroll: 1991, ‘Assessment of the Ethical Performance of Organizational Members’, Academy of Management Review 16(4), 667-691.Google Scholar
  13. Gerdom v.Continental Airlines, Inc., 692 F.2d. 602; 30 FEP 235 (9th cir. 1982) (en banc), cert denied, 460 U.S. 1074 (1983).Google Scholar
  14. Greenwood, M. R. C. and V. A. Pittman-Waller: 1988, ‘Weight Control: A Complex, Various, and Controversial Problem’, in R. Frankle and M. Yang (eds.), Obesity and Weight Control(Aspen Publishers, Rockville, MD).Google Scholar
  15. Haskins, K. M. and H. E. Ransford: 2000, ‘The Relationship Between Weight and Career Payoffs Among Women’, Social Forum 14(2), 295-318.Google Scholar
  16. Harris, M. B., RJ. Harris and S. Bochner: 1982, ‘Fat, Four-Eyed and Female: Stereotypes of Obesity, Glasses, and Gender’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 6, 503-516.Google Scholar
  17. Haung, W. and SE. Rubin: 1997, ‘Equal Access to Employment Opportunities for People with Mental Retardation: An Obligation of Society,' Journal of Rehabilitation 63, 27-33.Google Scholar
  18. Heilman, M. E.: 1997, ‘Sex Discrimination and the Affirmative Action Remedy: The Role of Sex Stereotypes’, Journal of Business Ethics 16(9), 877-889.Google Scholar
  19. Hogan, R., J. Hogan and B. W. Roberts: 1996, ‘Personality Measurement and Employment Decisions’, American Psychologists 51(5), 469-477.Google Scholar
  20. Hunter, J. E. and R. H. Hunter: 1984, ‘Validity and Utility of Alternative Predictors of Job Performance’, Psychological Bulletin 96, 72-98.Google Scholar
  21. Kennedy, D. B. and R. J. Homant: 1984, ‘Personnel Managers and the Stigmatized Employee’, Journal of Employment Counseling 21, 89-94.Google Scholar
  22. Klassen, M. L., C. R. Jasper and R. J. Harris: 1993, ‘The Role of Physical Appearance in Managerial Decisions’, Journal of Business and Psychology 8, 181-198.Google Scholar
  23. Klesges, R. C., M. L. Klem, C. L. Hanson, L. H. Eck, J. Ernst, D. O'Laughlin, A. Garrot and R. Rife: 1990, ‘The Effects of Applicant's Health Status and Qualifications on Simulated Hiring Decisions’, Journal of Obesit, 14, 527-535.Google Scholar
  24. Korn, J. B.: 1997, ‘Fat’, Boston University Law Review 77, 25-67.Google Scholar
  25. Ladd, R., L. Pasquerella and S. Smith: 1994, ‘Liability-Driven Ethics and the Impact on Hiring Practices: Restricting the Hiring of Workers With Potentially High Health Care Costs’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4, 321-333.Google Scholar
  26. Larkin, J. C. and H. A. Pines: 1979, ‘No Fat Persons Need Apply: Experimental Studies of the Overweight Stereotype and Hiring Preference’, Sociology of Work and Occupations 6, 312-327.Google Scholar
  27. Larson, L. K. and A. Larson: 1998, Employment Discrimination(Matthew Bender, New York).Google Scholar
  28. Larwood, L. and U. E. Gattiker: 1985, ‘Rational Bias and Interorganizational Power in the Employment of Management Consultants’, Group and Organization Studies 10, 3-17.Google Scholar
  29. Leigh, P.: 1991, ‘Employee Job Attributes as Predictors of Absenteeism in a National Sample of Workers: The Importance of Health and Dangerous Working Conditions’, Social Science and Medicine 33(2), 127-137.Google Scholar
  30. Lindeman, B. and P. Grossman.: 1997, Employment Discrimination Law, 3rd ed. (The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc., Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  31. Marks v.National Communications Association, Inc., 72 Fsupp. 322; 1999 U.S. Dist. Lexis 16474.Google Scholar
  32. Maranto, C. L. and A. F. Stenoien: 1997, ‘Weight Discrimination: A Multidisciplinary Analysis’, Industrial Relations Researchers Associations Annual Conference, Chicago.Google Scholar
  33. Mariott, B. M. and J. Grumstrup-Scott: 1992, Body Composition and Physical Performance: Applications for the Military Services(National academy Press, Washington DC).Google Scholar
  34. Marti, M. W., D. M. Bobier and R. S. Baron: 2000, ‘Right Before Our Eyes: The Failure to Recognize Non-Prototypical Forms of Prejudice’, Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 3(4), 403-418.Google Scholar
  35. McDermott, C. M.: 1995, ‘Should Employers be Allowed to Weigh Obesity in Their Employment Decisions? Cook v. Rhode Island, Department of Mental Health, Retardation and Hospitals’, The University of Kansas Law Review 44, 199-216.Google Scholar
  36. McDonald v.State of Kansas, 880 F. Supp. 1416 (D. Kan.1995).Google Scholar
  37. Merck Manual of Medical Information: 1997, R. Berkow (ed.) ( Merck Research Laboratories, Whitehouse Station, NJ).Google Scholar
  38. Minnow, M.: 1990, Making All The Difference: Inclusion, Exclusion, and American Law(Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York).Google Scholar
  39. Murrey, J. H.: 1980, ‘The Role of Height and Weight in the Performance of Salesmen of Ordinary Life Insurance’, Journal of the American Society of CLU 34, 56-64.Google Scholar
  40. Pagan, J. A. and A. Davila: 1997, ‘Obesity, Occupational Attainment, and Earnings’, Social Science Quarterly 78, 756-770.Google Scholar
  41. Parkes, K. R.: 1987, ‘Relative Weight, Smoking, and Mental Health as Predictors of Sickness and Absence from Work’, Journal of Applied Psychology 72, 275-286.Google Scholar
  42. Pingitore, R., B. L. Dugoni, R. S. Tindale and B. Spring: 1994, ‘Bias Against Overweight Job Applicants in a Simulated Employment Interview’, Journal of Applied Psychology 79, 909-917.Google Scholar
  43. Pool, R.: 2001, Fat: Fighting the Obesity Epidemic(Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
  44. Pronk, N. P., W. H. Agnes and P. O'Connor: 1999, ‘Obesity, Fitness, and the Willingness to Communicate and Health Care Costs’, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 33(11), 1535-1543.Google Scholar
  45. Register, C. A. and D. R. Williams: 1990, ‘Wage Effects of Obesity Among Young Workers’, Social Science Quarterly 71, 130-141.Google Scholar
  46. Roehling, M. V.: 1999, ‘Weight-Based Discrimination in Employment: Psychological and Legal Aspects’, Personnel Psychology 52(4), 969-1016.Google Scholar
  47. Roehling, M. V., J.E. Campion and R.D. Arvey: 1999, ‘Unfair Discrimination in the Employment Interview’, in R. Eder and G. Ferris (eds.), The Job Interview: Theory, Research, and Practice(Sage Publications, Newbury, CA).Google Scholar
  48. Rowan, J. R.: 2000, ‘The Moral Foundation of Employee Rights’, Journal of Business Ethics 24(4), 355-361.Google Scholar
  49. Smith, M. D., and W. McGhan.: 1996, ‘Flirting with the Financials of Fat’, Business and Health 14(7), 53-54.Google Scholar
  50. Solovay, S.: 1999, Tipping the Scales of Justice: Fighting Weight-Based Discrimination(Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY).Google Scholar
  51. State Division of Human Rights v.Xerox Corporation, 480 N.E.2d 695, 696 (N.Y. 1985).Google Scholar
  52. Surgeon General's Report on Nutrition and Health: 1988, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  53. Trentham, S. and L. Larwood: 1998, ‘Gender Discrimination and the Workplace: An Examination of Rational Bias Theory’, Sex Roles 38, 1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark V. Roehling
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Labor and Industrial RelationsMichigan State UniversityEast LansingU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations