Community Mental Health Journal

, Volume 38, Issue 5, pp 413–421 | Cite as

Family-Responsive Psychoeducation Groups for Families with an Adult Member with Mental Illness: Pilot Results

  • David E. Pollio
  • Carol S. North
  • Victoria A. Osborne


This paper documents recent pilot efforts of the Psychoeducation Responsive to Family (PERF) model, a yearlong group for families with an adult member coping with mental illness. PERF advances state-of-the-art in its: (a) application in community settings; (b) utility for families coping with all types of mental illness; (c) use of a standardized model, yet retaining a flexible curriculum responsive to family group membership concerns; and (d) recruitment from one-day family workshops of participants eager to further explore their issues. This report examines changes in these families' knowledge and mastery in a small random assignment study comparing the PERF model (n = 9) with a “usual services” (n = 10) condition. Study participants completed surveys measuring perceived mastery and knowledge at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months for both conditions. Families in the active PERF intervention demonstrated significant post-intervention improvements in four of five variables analyzed. For one of these items, PERF demonstrated significantly greater improvement than the usual care condition. Achievement of significant changes in these measures was examined in relation to timing of presentation of curriculum topics in the groups. Gains in perceived crisis effectiveness temporally correlated with coverage of that topic in the PERF groups, while gains in other items were instead steadily cumulative across the entire year. The encouraging results of this second pilot effort serve to substantiate the initial efforts in developing the PERF group model.

psychoeducation family mental illness groups treatment 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bisbee CC (1991). Educating Patients and Families about Mental Illness: A Practical Guide. Gaithersburg MD: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Burland JC, Mayeux DM & Gill D. (1992). Journey of Hope Family Education and Support. Baton Rouge, LA: Alliance for the Mentally Ill.Google Scholar
  3. Dixon L & Lehman AF. (1995). Family interventions for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 21, 631–643.Google Scholar
  4. Fallon IRH, Boyd JL, McGill CW, Williamson M, Razani J, Moss HB, Gilderman AM & Simpson GM. (1985). Family management in the prevention of morbidity of schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry, 42, 887–896.Google Scholar
  5. Lam DH. (1991). Psychosocial family intervention in schizophrenia: A review of empirical studies. Psychological Medicine, 21, 423–441.Google Scholar
  6. Lefley HP. (1995). “The family experience with mental illness” Application in designing programs for families and consumers.” Keynote paper presented at the National Institute of Health Knowledge Exchange Program Conference on Designing Programs for Families and Consumers. St. Louis, MO September 26–28.Google Scholar
  7. Mari JD & Streiner DL. (1994). An overview of family interventions and relapse on schizophrenia: Meta-analysis of research findings. Psychological Medicine, 24, 565–578.Google Scholar
  8. McFarlane WR, Dunne E, Lukens E, Newmark M, Toran J, Deakens S, & Horen B. (1993) From research to practice: Dissemination of New York state's family psychoeducation project. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 44, 265–270.Google Scholar
  9. McFarlane WR, Lukens E, Link B, Dushay R, Deakins SA, Newmark M, Dunne EJ, Horen B, & Toran J. (1995). Multiple family groups and psychoeducation in the treatment of schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry, 52, 679–687.Google Scholar
  10. Meisel M & Mannion E. (1991). Teaching Manual for Coping Skills Workshops. Philadelphia, PA: The Training and Education Center Network, Mental Health Association of Southeastern Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  11. Miklowitz DJ & Goldstein MJ. (1990). Behavioral family treatment for patients with bipolar affective disorder. Behavior Modification, 14, 457–489.Google Scholar
  12. Moller MD & Murphy MF. (1997). The three R's rehabilitation program: A prevention approach for the management of relapse symptoms associated with psychiatric diagnoses. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 20. 42–48.Google Scholar
  13. North CS, Pollio DE, Sacher B, Hong B, Isenberg K, & Bufe G. (1998). The family as caregiver: A group psychoeducation guide to schizophrenia. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68, 39–47.Google Scholar
  14. Pollio DE, North CS, Foster DA. (1998). Content and curriculum in psychoeducation groups for families of persons with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 49, 816–822.Google Scholar
  15. Pollio, DE, North CS, Osborne V, Kap N, & Foster DA. (2001). The impact of psychiatric diagnosis and family system relationship on content in psychoeducation. Family Process, 40, 199–210.Google Scholar
  16. Smith J, Birchwood M. (1990). Relatives and patients as partners in the management of schizophrenia: The development of a service model. British Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 654–660.Google Scholar
  17. Solomon P. (1996). Moving from psychoeducation to family education for family of adults with serious mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 47, 1364–1370.Google Scholar
  18. Solomon P, Draine J, Mannion E, & Meisel M. (1996). Impact of brief family psychoeducation on self-efficacy. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 22, 41–50.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • David E. Pollio
    • 1
  • Carol S. North
    • 2
  • Victoria A. Osborne
    • 3
  1. 1.George Warren Brown School of Social WorkWashington UniversitySt. Louis
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry, School of MedicineWashington UniversitySt. Louis
  3. 3.Health Resource Publishing CompanyUSA

Personalised recommendations