Skip to main content
Log in

A Common Data Set and Framework for Representing Spatial Location Information in the Internet

  • Published:
Cluster Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many organizations are currently working on how to express and provide location information to services and applications in the Internet. Each of them basically specifies their own way. This raises a problem – the various location information formats, services and applications will not be interoperable in the Internet. Interoperability can be achieved if there is a common way of expressing location information. This paper therefore proposes a common data set and an extensible framework of expressing location information in the Internet. The design aims at bridging various existing/proposed location data representation formats, as well as meeting the requirements of existing/proposed location-aware services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. IETF, Spatial Location BOF, http://www-nrc.nokia.com/ietf-spatial/

  2. P.H. Dana, Coordinate Systems Overview, Department of Geography, University of Texas at Austin (1997), http://www.colorado.Edu/ geography/gcraft/notes/coordsys/coordsys_f.html

  3. P.H. Dana, Geodetic Datum Overview, Department of Geography, University of Texas at Austin (1997), http://www.colorado.Edu/geography/ gcraft/notes/datum/datum_f.html

  4. B.W. Parkinson and J.J. Spilker, Jr. (eds.), Global Positioning System: Theory and Applications, Vol. 1 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., Washington, DC, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. Rantalainen et al., Evolution of location services in GSM and UMTS networks, in: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications (WPMC'00), Bangkok, Thailand, November 2000, pp. 1027-1032.

  6. 3rd Generation Partnership Project, Technical Specification Group Core Network, Universal Geographical Area Description (GAD), Release 1999, Technical Specification, 3G TS 23.032 V3.1.0, March 2000.

  7. Definition of aMobile Location API, Contribution to Location Interoperability Forum (LIF), API Specification, v. 0.2, June 2000.

  8. R. Lake and A. Cuthbert (eds.), Geography Markup Language (GML) v1.0, OGC Document Number: 00-029, May 2000, http://www. opengis.org/techno/specs/00-029.pdf

  9. Sekiguchi et al., NaVigation Markup Language (NVML), W3C Note, August 1999, http://www.w3.org/TR/NVML

  10. K. Hiroyuki and K. Tomihisa, POIX: Point Of Interest eXchange Language Specification, W3C Note, June 1999, http://www.w3.org/ TR/poix

  11. A. Daviel, Geographic registration of HTML documents, Internet draft, work in progress, April 2000, http://geotags.com/geo/draft-davielhtml-geo-tag-03.txt

  12. A. Daviel, Geographic extensions for HTTP transactions, Internet draft, work in progress, April 2000, http://geotags.com/geo/draft-daviel-httpgeo-header-02.txt

  13. P. Bennett, The NMEA FAQ, version 6.3, April 2000, http://vancouverwebpages. com/pub/peter/nmeafaq.txt

  14. Internet Mail Consortium, vCard - The Electronic Business Card Version 2.1, September 1996, http://www.imc.org/pdi/vcard-21.txt

  15. F. Dawson and T. Howes, vCard MIME Directory Profile, IETF RFC 2426, September 1998, http://www.imc.org/rfc2426

  16. F. Dawson and D. Stenerson, Internet Calendaring and Scheduling Core Object Specification (iCalendar), IETF RFC 2445, November 1998, http://www.imc.org/rfc2445

  17. C. Davis et al., A Means for Expressing Location Information in the Domain Name System, IETF RFC 1876, January 1996, ftp://ftp.funet. fi/pub/doc/rfc/rfc1876.txt

  18. R. Mahy, A Simple Text Format for the Spatial Location Protocol (SLoP), Internet draft, work in progress, July 2000, http://search.ietf. org/internet-drafts/draft-mahy-spatial-simple-coord-00.txt

  19. M. Wolf and C. Wicksteed, W3C Note, Date and Time Formats, September 1997, http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/NOTE-datetime-19980827

  20. M. Kuhn, A Summary of the International Standard Date and Time Notation, http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-time.html

  21. Bray et al., Namespaces in XML, in: World Wide Web Consortium, January 1999, http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xml-names-19990114

  22. Adams et al., Modularization of XHTML™, in: World Wide Web Consortium, October 2000, http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-xhtmlmodularization-20001020/xhtml-modularization-20001020.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Korkea-aho, M., Tang, H. A Common Data Set and Framework for Representing Spatial Location Information in the Internet. Cluster Computing 5, 389–397 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019712305191

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019712305191

Navigation