Advertisement

Foundations of Physics

, Volume 28, Issue 9, pp 1407–1416 | Cite as

Perihelion Precession in the Special Relativistic Two-Body Problem

  • M. A. Trump
  • W. C. Schieve
Article

Abstract

The classical two-body system with Lorentz-invariant Coulomb work function V = -k/ρ is solved in 3+1 dimensions using the manifestly covariant Hamiltonian mechanics of Stückelberg. Particular solutions for the reduced motion are obtained which correspond to bound attractive, unbound attractive, and repulsive scattering motion. A lack of perihelion precession is found in the bound attractive orbit, and the semiclassical hydrogen spectrum subsequently contains no fine structure corrections. It is argued that this prediction is indicative of the correct classical special relativistic two-body theory.

Keywords

Hydrogen Fine Structure Work Function Function Versus Structure Correction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    E. C. G. Stückelberg, Helv. Phys. Acta 14, 372, 588 (1941); 15, 23 (1942).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. P. Horwitz and C. Piron, Helv. Phys. Acta 46, 316 (1973).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. L. Cook, Aust. J Phys. 25, 117, 141 (1972).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Piron and F. Reuse, Helv. Phys. Acta 48, 631 (1975).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. A. Trump and W. C. Schieve, Special Relativistic Hamiltonian Particle Dynamics (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1998); see also M. A. Trump, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, 1997.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. A. Trump and W. C. Schieve, “Classical scattering in an invariant Coulomb potential,” Found. Phys., to be published, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    See A. Sommerfeld, Atomic Structure and Spectral Lines, Vol. I, 3rd revised ed.; translated from the 5th German edn. by H. L. Brose (Methuen, London, 1934). See also J. L. Synge, Relativity: The Special Theory(North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1965).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. R. Fanchi, Parameterized Relativistic Quantum Theory (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1993).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. P. Horwitz and W. C. Schieve, Phys. Rev. A 45, 743 (1992).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. A. Trump and W. C. Schieve, Found. Phys. 27, 1, 389 (1997).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. Goldstein, Classical Mechanics, 2nd edn. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1980).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. A. Bethe and E. E. Salpeter, The Quantum Mechanics of One-and Two-Electron Atoms (Academic Press, New York, 1957).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    W. Pauli, Z. Physik 43, 601 (1927).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. Arshansky and L. P. Horwitz, J. Math. Phys. 30, 66 (1989).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. A. Trump
  • W. C. Schieve

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations