Abstract
This study investigates the quality of the U.S. News annual ranking of national universities and liberal arts colleges. The main finding is that current rankings changes have a strong tendency to revert over the following two rankings. Using a simple model, this study estimates that about 70 to 80 percent of the variation in rankings changes is transitory and reversible. Thus, most of the “news” in the annual rankings is essentially meaningless noise. An analysis of possible explanations suggests that the noise in annual ranking changes is most likely due to various measurement, estimation, and other information processing errors in the rankings' underlying components.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Campbell, J., Lo, A., and MacKinlay, A. (1997). The Econometrics of Financial Markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image. Boston, Harvard Business School Press.
Gottlieb, Bruce (1999). Cooking the school books. Slate (a Web-based magazine), August 31.
Hunter, Bruce (1995). College guidebooks: background and development. In D. Walleri and M. K. Moss (eds.), New Directions in Institutional Research: No. 88. Evaluating and Responding to College Guidebooks and Rankings. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Karl, Jonathan (1999). Do these ballyhooed college rankings mean anything at all? A tutorial. The Wall Street Journal (September 10): W13.
McDonough, Patricia M., Antonio, Anthony L., Walpole, MaryBeth, Perez, Leonor X. (1998). College rankings: Democratized college knowledge for whom? Forthcoming in Review of Higher Education 39.
Webster, David S. (1992). Rankings of undergraduate education in U.S. News and World Report and Money: Are they any good? Change (March/April): 19-31.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dichev, I. News or Noise?. Research in Higher Education 42, 237–266 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018810005576
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018810005576