Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Power and Psychological Well-Being in Late Adolescent Romantic Relationships

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using Olsen and Cromwell's (1975) three facetsof interpersonal power (power in resources, process, andoutcomes), we examined the balance of power in lateadolescent romantic relationships and the associations between interpersonal power, adolescents'self-esteem, and depression. Participants were 61adolescent couples who were primarily European-American(90% of girls and 93% of boys), with the remainder being comprised of approximately 2-3% each of NativeAmerican, Asian, African American, and Hispanicindividuals. We assessed power in terms of access toemotional resources, control during video-tapedinteraction, and control over decision-making. Overall,couples were more likely to be described by themselvesand by independent observers as egalitarian, with themajority of couples equally contributing emotional resources, sharing power in interaction, andsharing decision-making responsibility. However,romantic relationships characterized by inequality inthe contribution of emotional resources and indecisionmaking were associated with greater psychologicalsymptomatology, especially for females.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adams, J. M., & Jones, W. H. (1997). The conceptualization of marital commitment: An integrative analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72,1177–1196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allgood-Merten, B., Lewinsohn, P. M., & Hops, H. (1990). Sex differences and adolescent depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 59,55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berghout-Austin, A. M., Salehi, M., & Lef¯ er, A. (1987). Gender and developmental differences in children's conversations. Sex Roles, 16(9/10),497–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatt, S., & Zuroff, D. (1992). Interpersonal relatedness and self-de® nition: Two prototypes for depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 12,527–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brage, D., & Meredith, W. (1994). A causal model of adolescent depression. Journal of Psychology, 128,455–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, M. A., & Peplau, L. A. (1984). The balance of power in lesbian relationships. Sex Roles, 10,587–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis.New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felmlee, D. H. (1994). Who's on top? Power in romantic relationships. Sex Roles, 31(5/6),275–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, U. G. (1971). Interpersonal and economic resources. Science, 171,345–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gage, A. J. (1997, April). Female empowermentand adolescent demographic behavior. Paper presented at Female Empowerment and Demographic Processes: Moving Beyond Cairo. Seminar conducted at the meeting of the IUSSP Committee on Gender and Population and Programme on Population and Development, Lund, Sweden.

  • Gelles, R. J. (1976). Abused wives: Why do they stay? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38(4),659–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C., Kohlberg, L., Lerner, J., & Belenky, M. (1971). Moral reasoning about sexual dilemmas. Technical Report of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography(Vol. 1). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grauerholz, E. (1987). Balancing the power in dating relationships. Sex Roles, 17,563–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grauerholz, E., & Serpe, R. T. (1985). Initiation and response: The dynamics of sexual interaction. Sex Roles, 12,1041–1059.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray-Little, B., & Burks, N. (1983). Power and satisfaction in marriage:A review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 93,513–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. J., & Firestone, J.M. (1998). Changes in predictors of gender role ideologies among women: A multivariate analysis. Sex Roles, 38,239–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (1993). Cause and consequences of low self-esteem in children and adolescents. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard.New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, D. E. (1980). Attitudes, status, and psychological functioning of women in egalitarian and traditional marriages. Dissertation Abstracts International, 40,5812–5813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J. A., Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1986). Sex, power, and influence tactics in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51,102–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacklin, C. N., & Maccoby, E. E. (1978). Social behavior at thirty-three months in same-sex and mixed sex dyads. Child Development, 49,557–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly,M. (1998, June 10). Southern Baptists adopt statement on the family. Baptist Press,p. 1.

  • Kollock, P., Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1985). Sex and power in interaction:Conversational privileges and duties. American Sociological Review, 50,34–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, B., & Jensen-Campbell, L. A. (in press). The nature and functions of social exchange in adolescentromantic relationships. In W.Furman, B.B., & Feiring, C. (Eds.),Contemporary perspectives on adolescent romantic relationships.New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Lind, P., & Connole, H. (1985). Sex differences in behavioral and cognitive aspects of decision control. Sex Roles, 12(7/8),813–823.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E. (1990). Gender and relationships. American Psychologist, 45,513–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, N., & Jessor, C. J. (1983). The courtship game: Power in the sexual encounter. In E. R. Allgeier & N. B. McCormick (Eds.), Changing boundaries: Gender roles and sexual behavior.Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1994). An interactive model for the emergence of gender differences in depression in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 4,519–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, D. H., & Cromwell, R. E. (1975). Methodological issues in family power. In R. E. Cromwell & D. H. Olson (Eds.), Power in families.New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlofsky, J. L. (1993). Intimacy status: Theory and research. In J. E. Marcia, A. S. Waterman, D. R. Matteson, S. L. Archer, & J. L. Orlofsky, Ego identity:A handbook for psychosocial research.New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peplau, L. A. (1979). Power in dating relationships. In J. Freeman (Ed.), Women: A feminist perspective(2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perper, T., & Weis, D. L. (1987). Proceptive and rejective strategie s of U.S. and Canadian college women. Journal of Sex Research, 23,455–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, E. L., Schmidtke, J. M., & Kulik, C. T. (1998). Propensity to sexually harass: An exploration of gender differences. Sex Roles, 38,443–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, A. C., Compas, B. E., Brooks-Gunn, J., Stemmler,M., Ey, S., & Grant, K. E. (1993). Depression in adolescence. American Psychologist, 48,155–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, S. I., Hauser, S. T., & Kilner, L. (1989). Adolescentmental health. American Psychologist, 44,200–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powlishta, K. K., & Maccoby, E. E. (1990). Resource utilization in mixed-sex dyads: The influence of adult presence and task type. Sex Roles, 23(5/6),223–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratto, F. (1996). Sexual politics: The gender gap in the bedroom, the cupboard, and the cabinet. In D.M. Buss & N. M. Malamuth (Eds.), Sex, power, con¯ ict: Evolutionary and feminist perspectives.New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1,385–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, H. (1967). Marital power in France, Greece, Yugoslavia, and the United States: A cross-national discussion. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 29,320–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg,M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image.Princeton,NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, C., Mirowsky, J., & Huber, J. (1983). Dividing work, sharing work, and in-between: Marriage patterns and depression. American Sociological Review, 48,809–823.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostosky, S. S., Welsh, D. P., Kawaguchi, M. C., & Vickerman, R. C. (in press). Commitment and sexual behaviors in adolescent dating couples. In W. Jones & J. Adams (Eds.), The handbook of interpersonal commitment and relationship stability.New York; Plenum.

  • Rostosky, S. S. (1997). Power, sex, and relationship quality in late adolescent dating relationships. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safilios-Rothschild, C. (1976). A macro-and micro-examination of power and love: An exchange model. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38,355–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, P. (1994). Peer marriage: How love between equals really works.New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serbin, L. A, Sprafkin, C., Elman, M., & Doyle, A. (1982). The early development of sexdifferentiated patterns of social influence. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 14, 350–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S. (1985). Sex differences in bases of power in dating relationships. Sex Roles, 12,449–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S. (1998). Social exchange theories and sexuality. The Journal of Sex Research, 35,32–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (1997). The balance of power in romantic heterosexual couples over time from ``his' ' and ``her' ' perspectives. Sex Roles, 37,361–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steil, J. M. (1994). Equality and entitlement in marriage: Benefits and barriers. In M. J. Lerner & G.Mikula (Eds.), Entitlement and the affectional bond: Justice in close relationships. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steil, J. M., & Turetsky, B. A. (1987). Is equal better? The relationship between marital equality and psychological symptomatology. Applied Social Psychology Annual, 7,73–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry.New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, R. K. (1976). Male is greater than female: The socialization of status inequality. The Counseling Psychologist, 6,2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, R. K. (1978). The politics of gender: A review of relevant literature. In J. Sherman & F. Denmark (Eds.), The psychology of women: Future directions of research.New York: Psychological Dimensions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Yperen, N., & Buunk, B. (1990). A longitudinal study of equity and satisfaction in intimate relationships. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20,287–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanfossen, B. E. (1977). Sexual stratification and sex-role socialization. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39,563–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanfossen, B. E. (1981). Sex differences in the mental health effects of spouse support and equity. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 22,130–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, W. (1937). The rating and dating complex. American Sociological Review, 2,727–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, D. P., Galliher, R. V., Kawaguchi, M. C., & Rostosky, S. S. (in review). Shared realities: Adolescent couples' subjective understanding of their interaction and its relationship to their mental health.

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1977). Women' s place in everyday talk: Reflections on parent-child interaction. Social Problems, 24,521–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1983). Small insults: A study of interruptions in cross-sex conversations between unacquainted persons. In B. Thorne, C. Kramarae, & N. Henley (Eds.), Language, gender and society.Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. W., & Koss, M. P. (1991). Courtship violence: Incidence in a national sample of higher education students. Violence and Victims, 6,247–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoder, J. D., & Kahn, A. S. (1992). Toward a feminist understanding of women and power. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16,381–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D. H., & West, C. (1975). Sex roles, interruptions, and silences in conversation. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex:Differences and dominance.Rowely, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Renee V. Galliher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sharon S. Rostosky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Deborah P. Welsh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Myra C. Kawaguchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Galliher, R.V., Rostosky, S.S., Welsh, D.P. et al. Power and Psychological Well-Being in Late Adolescent Romantic Relationships. Sex Roles 40, 689–710 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018804617443

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018804617443

Keywords

Search

Navigation