Journal of Community Health

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 73–91 | Cite as

Patient Satisfaction in Turkey: Differences between Public and Private Hospitals

  • Dilaver Tengilimoglu
  • Adnan Kisa
  • Sophia F. Dziegielewski


This article reports the results of a patient-satisfaction survey administered by interview to 2045 adults discharged from several major public and private hospitals in Turkey. The direct measurement of patient-satisfaction is a new phenomenon for this country. An instrument was designed similar to those available in the United States and administered during exit interviews. Two primary areas of analyses were determined in comparing services provided by these public and private hospitals: demographic factors with regard to accessibility and consumer perceptions of the quality of service provided. Relationships and percentages within and among the five public and two private hospitals are reported. Several statistically significant differences were found between the hospitals, with the private hospitals achieving the greatest satisfaction on most of the quality of services issues examined. Future recommendations outline the need to take into account the public's perception of these hospitals and enhancing customer satisfaction as a means of increasing service utilization.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Carmel S. Satisfaction with hospitalization: A comparative analysis of three types of services. Social Science and Medicine1985; 11:1243–1249.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ware JE, Snyder MK, Wright WR, and Davies, AR. Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care. Evaluation and Program Planning1984; 6:247–263.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ownes DJ and Batchelor C. Patient satisfaction and the elderly. Social Science & Medicine1996; 42,11:1483–1491.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fitzpatric R. Surveys of patient satisfaction: Important general considerations. BMJ1991; 887–889.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Joos SK, Hickam, DH and Border LM. Patients' desires and satisfaction in general medicine clinics. Public Health Reports1993; 108, 6:751–759.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tatar M and Tatar F. Primary health care in Turkey: A passing fashion? Health Policy and Planning1997; 12,3:224–233.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bernd DL. Patient-focused care pays hospital-wide dividends.Health Strategic Management, 1992; 10, 12:9–12.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dansky HK and Miles, J. Patient satisfaction with ambulatory health care services: Waiting time and filling time. Hospital and Health Services Administration1997; 42, 20:165–177.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Epstein KR, Laine C, Farber NJ, Nelson EC and Davidoff, F. Patients perceptions of office medical practice: Judging quality through the patients' eyes. American Journal of Medical Quality1996; 11, 2:73–80.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lin B. and Kelly, E. Methodological issues in patient satisfaction surveys. Quality Assurance1995; 8, 6:32–37.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mowen JC, Licata JW and McPhail, J. Waiting in the emergency room: How to improve patient satisfaction. Journal of Health Care Marketing1993; 26–33.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nelson CW and Niederberger, J. Patient satisfaction surveys: An opportunity for total quality improvement. Hospital and Health Services Administration1990; 35, 3:409–27.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peyrot M, Cooper, PD, and Schnap, FD. Consumer satisfaction and perceived quality of outpatient health services. Journal of Health Care Marketing1993; 24–33.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chetwynd JS. Satisfactions and dissatisfactions with public and private hospitals. The New Zealand Medical Journal1988; 853:563–569.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hall JA and Dorman, MC. Patient sociodemographic characteristics as predictors of satisfaction with medical care: A meta-analysis. Social Science & Medicine1990; 30, 7:811–818.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mummalaneni V and Gopalakrishna, P. Mediators versus moderators of patient satisfaction: The role of sociodemographic characteristics might be less significant than previously thought. Journal of Health Care Marketing1995; 15, 14:16–21.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dilaver Tengilimoglu
  • Adnan Kisa
  • Sophia F. Dziegielewski

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations