Advertisement

Euphytica

, Volume 104, Issue 2, pp 95–106 | Cite as

Plant aneuploids: Suggestions for their classification

  • A.K. Koul
  • M.K. Dhar
Article
  • 143 Downloads

Abstract

The paper lists, defines and classifies all types of aneuploids known hitherto. Categorisation has been made on the basis of the alterations of chromosome number and gene content. The change in nomenclature of some aneuploids has been warranted by the fact that some names that are in vogue do not reflect the precise nature of the aneuploid and, are therefore, ambiguous. For these ambiguous terms new names have been proposed.

aneuploids nomenclature trisomics monosomics gene content 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barve, S.S. & A.B. Sapre, 1986. Monotrisomic in Coix gigantea(Poaceae). Curr Sci 55: 660-661.Google Scholar
  2. Blakeslee, A.F., 1921. Types of mutations and their possible significance in evolution. Amer Natur 55: 254-267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blakeslee, A.F., J. Belling & M.E. Farnham, 1920. Chromosomal duplication and mendelian phenomena in Daturamutants. Science 52: 388-390.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bond, D.J. & A.C. Chandley, 1983. Aneuploidy. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  5. Burnham, C.R., 1930. Genetical and cytological studies of semisterility and related phenomena in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 16: 269-277.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burnham, C.R., 1962. Discussions in cytogenetics. Burgess, Minneapolis, Minnesota.Google Scholar
  7. Clausen, R.E. & T.H. Goodspeed, 1926. Inheritance in Nicotiana tabacumVII. The monosomic character 'fluted'. Univ Calif Pub Bot 11: 61-82.Google Scholar
  8. Dellarco, V.L., P.E. Voyth & A. Hollaender, 1985. Aneuploidy: Etiology and mechanisms. Plenum Press, New York and London.Google Scholar
  9. Dhar, M.K., 1991. Cytogenetic studies on some telo aneuploids of Plantago lagopusL. and their progeny. (Ph D Thesis) Jammu University, Jammu, India, pp 176.Google Scholar
  10. Dhar, M.K. & A.K. Koul, 1995. Four novel telo aneuploids of Plantago lagopusL. J Hered 86: 243-245.Google Scholar
  11. Dhar, M.K., A.K. Koul & A. Langer, 1990. Genetic diversity among Plantagos 17. A novel trisomic in Plantago lagopus. Theor Appl Genet 79: 216-218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dyer, A., F.K. Jong & J.A. Ratter, 1970. Aneuploidy: a redefinition. Notes Roy Bot Garden, Edinburgh 30: 177.Google Scholar
  13. Fedak, G. & S.B. Helgason, 1970. The cytogenetics of a ditelotetrasomic line in barley. Can J Genet Cytol 12: 553-559.Google Scholar
  14. Frost, H.B., 1927. Chromosome mutant types in stocks (Matthiola incanaR. Bx) I. Characters due to extra chromosomes. J Hered 18: 474-486.Google Scholar
  15. Fujigaki, J. & T. Tsuchiya, 1981. A new type of trisomic for chromosome 6 (meta trisomic 6A) in barley. Barley Genet Newl 11: 28-29.Google Scholar
  16. Goodspeed, T.H. & P. Avery, 1939. Trisomics and other types in Nicotiana sylvestris.J Genet 38: 381-458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gill, B.S., 1974. A novel ditertiary tetrasomic in tomato. Genetics 77: 61-70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kamanoi, M., 1973. On chromosome conjugations in the ditelo diisotetrasomic plants in petkus rye. Japan Genet 48: 423.Google Scholar
  19. Khush, G.S., 1973. Cytogenetics of aneuploids. Academic Press, New York, pp. 301.Google Scholar
  20. Khush, G.S. & C.M. Rick, 1967. Novel compensating trisomics of the tomato: Cytogenetics, monosomic analysis and other applications. Genetics 55: 297-307.Google Scholar
  21. Khush, G.S. & C.M. Rick, 1968. Tomato telotrisomics: Origin, identification and use in linkage mapping. Cytologia 33: 137-148.Google Scholar
  22. Kimber, G. & E.R. Sears, 1968. Nomenclature for the description of aneuploids in the Triticinae.In: Proc 3rd Int Wheat Genetics Symp Aust Acad Sci Canberra: 468-473.Google Scholar
  23. Koul, A.K., M.K. Dhar & A. Bhan, 1995. Trisomics in plants. Platinum Jubilee Volume, J Indian Bot Soc 74A: 555-566.Google Scholar
  24. Lesley, J.W. 1928. Cytological and genetical study of progenies of triploid tomatoes. Genetics 13: 1-43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lutz, A.M., 1909. Notes on the first generation hybrid of Oenothera lata× O. gigas. Science 29: 263-267.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Matsumura, S., 1954. Chromosome analysis of the Dinkel genome in the offspring of a pentaploid wheat hybrid V. Gigas plants in the offspring of nullisomic dwarfs and analysis of their additional chromosome pair. Cytologia 19: 273-285.Google Scholar
  27. Pantulu, J.V. & G.J.N. Rao, 1981. Telo aneuploids in pearl millet. Theor Appl Genet 60: 381-382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rao, P.N., A. Nirmala & P. Ranganadham, 1988. Trisomic categories in pearlmillet (Pennisetum americanum(L.) Leeke). Theor Appl Genet 75: 340-343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Raupp, W.J., B. Friebe & B.S. Gill, 1995. Suggested guidelines for the nomenclature and abbreviation of the genetic stocks of wheat, Triticum aestivumL. em Thell., and its relatives. Wheat Information Service 81: 50-55.Google Scholar
  30. Rick, C.M., 1943. Cytogenetic consequences of X-ray treatment of pollen in Petunia. Bot Gaz 104: 528-540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rieger, R., A. Michaelis & M.M. Green, 1976. Glossary of genetics and cytogenetics: Classical and molecular. Berlin, Springer Verlag, New York, pp. 30-31.Google Scholar
  32. Sai Kumar, R., U.P. Singh, R.B. Singh & R.M. Singh, 1982. Cytomorphological behavior of tetra-trisomic plants in pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum(L.) K. Schum) Curr Sci 51: 376-378.Google Scholar
  33. Sapre, A.B. & S.S. Barve, 1983. Occurrence of pentasomic and hexasomic plants in wild population of Coix gigantea. Curr Sci 52: 614-615.Google Scholar
  34. Sapre, A.B. & S.S. Barve, 1984. Nullisomy to hexasomy in Coix gigantea(Poaceae). Cytologia 49: 345-349.Google Scholar
  35. Sapre, A.B. & N.S. Mishra. 1990. A quadruple trisomic among the open-pollinated progeny of an autotriploid Coix lacryma-jobi.Cytologia 55: 593-594.Google Scholar
  36. Sapre, A.B. & A.S. Naik, 1991. Occurrence of octosomic plant among selfed progeny of tetrasomic Coix giganteaRoxb. Cytologia 56: 27-29.Google Scholar
  37. Sears, E.R., 1941. Nullisomics in Triticum vulgare.Genetics 26: 167-168.Google Scholar
  38. Sears, E.R., 1966. Nullisomic-tetrasomic combinations in hexaploid wheat. In: R. Riley & K.R. Lewis (Eds.) Chromosome manipulations and plant genetics. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh, Scotland. pp. 29-45.Google Scholar
  39. Shahla, A. & T. Tsuchiya, 1986. Cytogenetics of the acrotrisomic 5S.5L in barley. Can J Genet Cytol 28: 1026-1033.Google Scholar
  40. Sybenga, J., 1975. Meiotic configurations (Monographs genetics 1). Springer. Berlin, Heidelberg. New York.Google Scholar
  41. Tackholm, G., 1922. Zytologische studien über die Gattung Rosa.Acta Hort Berg 7: 97-381.Google Scholar
  42. Tsuchiya T. & J. Fujigaki, 1981. Genetic analysis with acrotrisomic 1S.1L. Barley Genet Newl 11: 59-60.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • A.K. Koul
    • 1
  • M.K. Dhar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiosciencesUniversity of JammuJammu-India

Personalised recommendations