Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship Between Acid Reflux Episodes and Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms Is Very Inconstant

  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this prospective study 244 consecutive patients presenting with typical and chronic signs of gastroesophageal reflux were included. Conventional 24-hr esophageal pH monitoring was carried out to establish the symptom association probability, the concordance index, and the symptom sensitivity index. The symptom association probability could be calculated in 110 patients (45%). Two groups were identified: group 1 had normal duration of esophageal acid exposure; subgroup 1a (nonsignificant symptom association probability) included 39 patients (35.5%) and subgroup 1b (significant symptom association probability) included 24 patients (21.8%); group 2 had abnormal duration of esophageal acid exposure; subgroup 2a (nonsignificant symptom association probability) included 21 patients (19.1%) and subgroup 2b (significant symptom association probability) included 26 patients (23.6%). In all, 56.6% of the patients presented typical symptoms of reflux not directly determined by one or repeated acid reflux episodes. The correlation between symptom association probability and the symptom sensitivity index allows for more accurate determination of esophageal acid sensitivity (subgroups 1b and 2b).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Armstrong D, Emde C, Inauen W, Blum AL: Diagnostic assessment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: What is possible vs what is practical? Hepato-Gastroenterol 39(suppl 1):3–13, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ghillebert G, Janssens J, Vantrappen G, Nevens F, Piessens J: Ambulatory 24 hour intraoesophageal pH and pressure recordings vs provocation tests in the diagnosis of chest pain of oesophageal origin. Gut 31:738–744, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shi G, Bruley des Varannes S, Scarpignato C, Le Rhun M, Galmiche JP: Reflux related symptoms in patients with normal oesophageal exposure to acid. Gut 37:457–464, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wiener GJ, Richter JE, Copper JB, Wu WC, Castelle DO: The symptom index: A clinically important parameter of ambulatory 24 hour esophageal pH monitoring. Am J Gastroenterol 83:358–361, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  5. Breumelhof R, Smout AJPM: The symptom sensitivity index: A valuable additional parameter in 24-hour esophageal pH recording. Am J Gastroenterol 86:160–164, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rune SJ: Heartburn and dyspepsia: The utility of symptom analysis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 11(suppl 2):9–12, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rune SJ: Better definition of endoscopy-negative acid reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 11(suppl 2):79–80, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  8. Weustens BLAM, Roelofs JMM, Akkermans LMA, Van Berge-Henegouwen GP, Smout AJPM: The symptomassociation probability: An improved method for symptom analysis of 24-hr esophageal pH data. Gastroenterology 107:1741–1745, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  9. Savary M, Miller G: L'oesophage. Manuel et atlas d'endoscopie. Soleure, Switzerland, Gassmann SA, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mattox HE, Richter JE: Prolonged ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring in the evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Med 89:345–356, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaye MD: Postprandial gastro-oesophageal reflux in healthy people. Gut 18:709–712, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sontag SJ: Rolling review: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 7:293–312, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sifrim D, Silny J, Holloway RH, Janssens JJ: Patterns of gas and liquid reflux during transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation: A study using intraluminal electrical impedance. Gut 44:47–54, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  14. Washington N, Moss HA, Washington C, Greavec JL, Steele RJC, Wilson CG: Non-invasive detection of gastro-oesophageal reflux using an ambulatory system. Gut 34:1482–1486, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  15. Washington N, Steele RJC, Jackson SJ, Washington C, Bush D: Patterns of food and acid reflux in patients with low-grade oesophagitis. The role of anti-reflux agent. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 12:53–58, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  16. Washington N, Greaves JL, Iftikhar SY: A comparison of gastro-oesophageal reflux in volunteers assessed by ambulatory pH and gamma monitoring after treatment with either liquid Gaviscon or Algicon suspension. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 6:579–588, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  17. Janssens J, Vantrappen G, Vos R, Ghillebert G: The acid burden over an extended period preceding a reflux episode is a major determinant in the development of heartburn. Gastroenterology 102:A90, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lundell L: New information relevant to long-term management of endoscopy-negative reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 11(suppl 2):93–98, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lauritsen K: Management of endoscopy-negative reflux disease: Progress with short-term treatment. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 11(suppl 2):87–92, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dent J: Management strategies for gastro-oesophagal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 11(suppl 2):99–105, 1997

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Colas-Atger, E., Bonaz, B., Papillon, E. et al. Relationship Between Acid Reflux Episodes and Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms Is Very Inconstant. Dig Dis Sci 47, 645–651 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017940724692

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017940724692

Navigation