Skip to main content
Log in

Exact Penalty Functions for Convex Bilevel Programming Problems

  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a new constraint qualification for convex bilevel programming problems. Under this constraint qualification, a locally and globally exact penalty function of order 1 for a single-level reformulation of convex bilevel programming problems is given without requiring the linear independence condition and the strict complementarity condition to hold in the lower-level problem. Based on these results, locally and globally exact penalty functions for two other single-level reformulations of convex bilevel programming problems can be obtained. Furthermore, sufficient conditions for partial calmness to hold in some single-level reformulations of convex bilevel programming problems can be given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stackelberg, H. V., The Theory of the Market Economy, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bard, J. F., Some Properties of the Bilevel Programming Problem, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 68, pp. 371–378, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dempe, S., A Necessary and a Sufficient Optimality Condition for Bilevel Programming Problems, Optimization, Vol. 25, pp. 341–354, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Outrata, J. V., On Necessary Optimality Conditions for Stackelberg Problems, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 76, pp. 306–320, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Outrata, J. V., On Optimization Problems with Variational Inequality Constraints, SIAM Journal on Optimization, Vol. 4, pp. 340–357, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, S., Wang, Q., and Romano-Rodriquez, S., Optimality Conditions and an Algorithm for Linear-Quadratic Bilevel Programs, Optimization, Vol. 31, pp. 127–139, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, R., Problems of Hierarchical Optimization in Finite Dimensions, SIAM Journal on Optimization, Vol. 4, pp. 521–536, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, Y., and Florian, M., On the Geometry Structure of Linear Bilevel Programs: A Dual Approach, Technical Report CRT-867, Centre de Recherches sur les Transports, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Loridan, P., and Morgan, J., Weak via Strong Stackelberg Problem: New Results, Journal of Global Optimization, Vol. 8, pp. 263–287, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bi, Z., Calamai, P., and Conn, A., An Exact Penalty Function Approach for the Linear Bilevel Programming Problem, Technical Report 167–0–310789, Department of Systems Design and Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Falk, J. E., and Liu, J., On Bilevel Programming, Part 1: General Nonlinear Cases, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 70, pp. 47–72, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Outrata, J. V., and Zowe, J., A Numerical Approach to Optimization Problems with Variational Inequality Constraints, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 68, pp. 105–130, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tuy, H., Migdalas, A., and VÄrbrand, P., A Global Optimization Approach for the Linear Two-Level Programs, Journal of Global Optimization, Vol. 3, pp. 1–23, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Al-Khayyal, F., Horst, R., and Pardalos, P., Global Optimization of a Concave Function Subject to Quadratic Constraints: An Application in Nonlinear Bilevel Programming, Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 34, pp. 125–147, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vicente, L., Savard, G., and Judice, G., Descent Approaches for Quadratic Bilevel Programming, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 81, pp. 379–399, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ben-Ayed, O., Bilevel Linear Programming, Computers and Operations Research, Vol. 20, pp. 485–501, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vicente, L. N., and Calamai, P. H., Bilevel and Multilevel Programming: A Bibliography Review, Journal of Global Optimization, Vol. 3, pp. 291–306, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Luo, Z. Q., Pang, J. S., and Ralph, D., Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Outrata, J., Kocvara, M., and Zowe, J., Nonsmooth Approach to Optimization Problems with Equilibrium Constraints: Theory, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Holland, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ye, J., Zhu, D. L., and Zhu, Q., Generalized Bilevel Programming Problems, SIAM Journal on Optimization, Vol. 7, pp. 481–507, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ye, J., and Zhu, D. L., Optimality Conditions for Bilevel Programming Problems, Optimization, Vol. 33, pp. 9–27, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Anandalingam, G., and White, D. J., A Solution Method for the Linear Static Stackelberg Problem Using a Penalty Function, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 35, pp. 1170–1173, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Marcotte, P., and Zhu, D. L., Exact and Inexact Penalty Methods for the Generalized Bilevel Programming Problem, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 74, pp. 141–157, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Luo, Z. Q., Pang, J. S., and Ralph, D., Piecewise Sequential Quadratic Programming for Mathematical Programs with Nonlinear Complementarity Constraints, Complementarity and Variational Problems: State of the Art, Edited by M. C. Ferris and J. S. Pang, SIAM Publications, Providence, Rhode Island, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Janin, R., Directional Derivative of the Marginal Function in Nonlinear Programming, Mathematical Programming Study, Vol. 24, pp. 110–126, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Clarke, F. H., Optimization and Nonsmooth Analysis, John Wiley, New York, NY, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dolecki, S., and Rolewicz, S., Exact Penalties for Local Minima, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, Vol. 17, pp. 596–606, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Burke, J. V., Calmness and Exact Penalization, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, Vol. 29, pp. 493–497, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Burke, J. V., An Exact Penalization Viewpoint of Constrained Optimization, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, Vol. 29, pp. 968–998, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  30. di Pillo, G., Exact Penalty Method, Algorithms for Continuous Optimization, Edited by E. Spedicato, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 209–253, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fukushima, M., Luo, Z. Q., and Pang, J. S., A Globally Convergent Sequential Quadratic Programming Algorithm for Mathematical Programs with Linear Complementarity Constraints, Computational Optimization and Applications, Vol. 10, pp. 5–34, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Facchinei, F., Jiang, H. Y., and Qi, L., A Smoothing Method for Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 85, pp. 107–134, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fischer, A., An NCP-Function and Its Use for the Solution of Complementarity Problems, Recent Advances in Nonsmooth Optimization, Edited by D. Z. Du, L. Qi, and R. S. Womersley, World Scientific, Singapore, Republic of Singapore, pp. 261–289, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Scholtes, S., and StÖhr, M., Exact Penalization of Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, Vol. 37, pp. 617–652, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Robinson, S. M., Generalized Equations and Their Solutions, Part 2: Applications to Nonlinear Programming, Mathematical Programming Study, Vol. 19, pp. 200–221, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, G.S., Han, J.Y. & Zhang, J.Z. Exact Penalty Functions for Convex Bilevel Programming Problems. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 110, 621–643 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017592429235

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017592429235

Navigation