Abstract
This paper explores how providing the inferential basis to argue for a range of equally plausible interpretations features as a way of managing issues of accountability in talk about armed confrontation. We examine conversation produced in open-ended interviews with diplomatic representatives of the United States and Great Britain in discussion about those countries' involvement in the Persian Gulf conflict of 1990–91. By providing the inferential basis upon which to argue for a range of equally plausible interpretative scenarios, speakers attend to the potential for any one account to be privileged over another. Further, in speculating upon the relationship between interpretative particulars and the inferential outcome to be drawn for some specific version of events in question, speakers work to establish the parameters of an admissible narrative trajectory with which to account for those events. In so doing, they manage the implications that excluded versions would otherwise make relevant.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albert, M. and Shalom, S.R. (1999). Z Magazine. (www.zmag.org/Zmag/kosovoqa.htm, 16 May 1999).
Atkinson, P. and Silverman, D. (1997). Kundera's Immortality: The Interview Society and the Invention of the Self. Qualitative Inquiry 3(3): 304–325.
Beck, U. (2000). The Cosmopolitan Perspective: Sociology of the Second Age of Modernity. British Journal of Sociology 51(1): 79–105.
Benin, J. (1991). Origins of the Gulf War, Pamphlet No. 3. Westfield, NJ: Open Magazine Pamphlet Series.
Billig, M. (1987/1996). Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Billig, M. (1991). Ideology and Opinions: Studies in Rhetorical Psychology. London: Sage.
Bogen, D. and Lynch, M. (1989). Taking Account of the Hostile Native: Plausible Deniability and the Production of Conventional History in the Iran-Contra Hearings. Social Problems 36(3): 197–224.
Brannigan, A. and Lynch, M. (1987). On Bearing False Witness: Perjury and Credibility as Interactional Accomplishments. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 16: 115–146.
Bresheeth, H. and Yuval-Davis, M. (Eds.). (1991). The Gulf War and the New World Order. London: Zed Books.
Campbell, D. (1993). Politics Without Principle: Sovereignty, Ethics, and the Narratives of the Gulf War. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Campbell, D. (1998). Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity, rev. ed. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. 208 KEVIN MCKENZIE
Chomsky, N. (1991). Noam Chomsky on the “New World Order” and the Origins of His Skepticism (interviewed by D. Barsamian). Our Generation 22(1–2): 16–74.
Clegg, S. R. (1989). Frameworks of Power. London: Sage.
Cronon, W. (1992). A Place for Stories: Nature, History and Narrative. Journal of American History 78(4): 1347–1376.
Edwards, D. (1995). Two to Tango: Script Formulations, Dispositions, and Rhetorical Symmetry in Relationship Troubles Talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction 28(4): 319–350.
Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage.
Edwards, D. and Potter, J. (1992). Discursive Psychology.London: Sage.
Edward, D. and Potter, J. (1993). Language and Causation: A Discursive Action Model of Description and Attribution. Psychological Review 100(1): 23–41.
Emery, M. (1991). How Mr. Bush Got His War: Deceptions, Double-Standards & Disinformation, Pamphlet #9. Westfield, NJ: Open Magazine Pamphlet Series.
Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G. and Trew, T. (1979). Language and Control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gilbert, G.N. and Mulkay, M. (1984). Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goffman, E. (1979). Footing. Semiotica25: 1–29.
Haraway, D. (1989). The Biopolitics of Postmodern Bodies: Determinations of Self in Immune System Discourse. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Criticism 1.
Holton, R.J. (1989). Globalization and the Nation-State. London: Macmillan Press.
Horwitz, H. (1988). 'I Can't Remember': Scepticism, Synthetic Histories, Critical Action. South Atlantic Quarterly 87.
Hulet, C. (1991). The Secret U.S. Agenda in the Gulf War, Pamphlet No. 5. Westfield, NJ: Open Magazine Pamphlet Series.
Kaldor, M. (1999). New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Lynch, M. and Bogen, D. (1996). The Spectacle of History: Speech, Text, and Memory at the Iran Contra Hearings. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
McKenzie, K. (1998). In the Gulf Between Prejudice and Culture: Talking the Experience of Western Expatriates in the Middle East. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Loughborough University.
McKenzie, K. (forthcoming) Managing Consensus in International Conflict: The Case of the United Nations versus Saddam Hussein.
McKenzie, K. and van Teeffelen, T. (1993). Taking the Higher Ground Between West and Middle East: The Discursive Achievement of Meta-Perspective in Representations of the Arab Other. Pragmatics 3(3): 305–331.
Middleton, D. and Edwards, D. (Eds.). (1990). Collective Remembering.London: Sage.
Osborne, T. and Rose, N. (1999). Do the Social Sciences Create Phenomena?: The Example of Public Opinion Research. British Journal of Sociology 50(3): 367–396.
Pollner, M. (1987). Mundane Reason: Reality in Everyday and Sociological Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Potter, J. (1996). Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: Sage.
Potter, J. and Edwards, D. (1990). Nigel Lawson's Tent: Discourse Analysis, Attribution Theory and the Social Psychology of Fact. European Journal of Social Psychology 26: 405–424. 209 FACT AND NARRATIVES OF WAR
Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative Analysis. London: Sage.
Schegloff, E.A. (1988). Goffman and the Analysis of Conversation. In P. Drew and A. Wootton (Eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, pp. 89–135. Oxford: Policy Press.
Waters, M. (1995). Globalization. London: Routledge.
Wetherell, M. and Potter, J. (1992). Mapping the Language of Racism: Discourse and the Legitimation of Exploitation. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Widdicombe, S. and Wooffitt, R. (1995). The Language of Youth Subcultures: Social Identity in Action. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Wiener, J. (1991). Domestic Political Incentives for the Gulf War. New Left Review 187: 72–78. 210 KEVIN MCKENZIE
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McKenzie, K. Fact and the Narratives of War: Produced Undecidability in Accounts of Armed Conflict. Human Studies 24, 187–209 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017543122464
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017543122464