Skip to main content
Log in

Epithelial Differentiation and Proliferative Potential in Spinal Ependymomas

  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this investigation was recognition of the epithelial differentiation and proliferative activity of ependymomas in the spinal cord compared with astrocytomas in the spinal cord and ependymoma in the brain. We investigated histopathological and immunohistochemical examination in thirty-five cases, including eleven ependymomas, thirteen astrocytomas in the spinal region and eleven ependymomas in the intracranial region. An anti-epithelial membrane antigen antibody (EMA), and two types of anti-cytokeratin antibodies, CAM 5.2 (45 and 52 kDa) and keratin (56 and 64 kDa) were applied as epithelial markers. The proliferative potential of the tumors was investigated using the Ki-67 labeling index (LI, %). Histologically, perivascular pseudorosettes were seen in all of the spinal and intracranial ependymomas. There were few ependymal structures in the spinal ependymomas except in the myxopapillary type. Immunohistochemical study demonstrated that nine (82%) were immunoreactive for EMA, eight (73%) were immunoreactive for CAM 5.2 and three (27%) were immunoreactive for keratin in the spinal ependymomas. In the spinal astrocytomas, no tumors were immunoreactive for EMA or CAM 5.2. One of thirteen cases was immunoreactive for keratin. The Ki-67 LI of the spinal ependymomas was lower than that of the intracranial ependymoma (p < 0.01). Epithelial differentiation was found in the ependymomas, which may reflect the differences in histological and biological features between ependymomas and astrocytomas in the spinal cord. Regional differences in ependymomas may influence not only clinical features but also histo-pathological characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mørk SJ, Løken AC: Ependymoma: a follow-up study of 101 cases. Cancer 40: 907-915, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ang LC, Taylor AR, Bergin D, Kaufmann JCE: An immunohistochemical study of papillary tumors in the central nervous system. Cancer 65: 2712-2719, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  3. Birgisson S, Blondal H, Bjornsson J, Olafsdottir K: Tumours in Iceland. 15. Ependymoma. A clinicopathological and immunohistological study. APMIS 100: 294-300, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  4. Coakham HB, Garson JA, Allan PM, Harper EI, Brownell B, Kemshead JT, Lane EB: Immunohistological diagnosis of central nervous system tumours using a monoclonal antibody panel. J Clin Pathol 38: 165-173, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  5. Furness PN, Lowe J, Tarrant GS: Subepithelial basement membrane deposition and intermediate filament expression in choroid plexus neoplasms and ependymomas. Histopathology 16: 251-255, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mannoji H, Becker LE: Ependymal and choroid plexus tumors: cytokeratin and GFAP expression. Cancer 61: 1377-1385, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  7. Miettinen M, Clark R, Virtanen I: Intermediate filament proteins in choroid plexus and ependyma and their tumors. Am J Pathol 123: 231-240, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  8. Takeuchi H, Kubota T, Kabuto M, Kitai R, Nozaki J, Yamashita J: Prediction of recurrence in histologically benign meningioma: proliferating cell nuclear antigen and Ki-67 immunohistochemical study. Sur Neurol 48: 501-506, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  9. Burger PC, Scheithauer BW: Tumors of the central nervous system. Altas of Tumor Pathology. Series 3, Fascicle 10, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC, 1994, pp 25-161

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goebel HH, Craviolo H: Ultrastructure of human and experimental ependymomas: comparative study. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 31: 54-71, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hirano A, Ghatak NR, Zimmerman HM: The fine structure of ependymoblastoma. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 32: 144-152, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kubota T, Ishie J, Yamashima T et al.: Abnormal cilia in malignant ependymoma. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 71: 100-104, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ho KL, Caccamo DV, Garcia JH: Intracytoplasmic lumina in ependymomas: an ultrastructural study. Ultrastruct Pathol 18: 371-380, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ng H-K, Tse CCH, Lo STH: Ependymomas-an immunohistochemical study of 14 cases. Histopathology 13: 462-465, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  15. Epstein FJ, Farmer J-P, Freed D: Adult intramedullary spinal cord ependymomas: the result of surgery in 38 patients. J Neurosurg 79: 204-209, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  16. Prayson RA: Clinicopathological study of 61 patients with ependymoma including MIB-1 immunohistochemistry. Ann Diagn Pathol 3: 11-18, 1999

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Takeuchi, H., Kubota, T., Sato, K. et al. Epithelial Differentiation and Proliferative Potential in Spinal Ependymomas. J Neurooncol 58, 13–19 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015844704632

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015844704632

Navigation