Advertisement

Transport in Porous Media

, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp 291–313 | Cite as

Averaged Reynolds Equation for Flows between Rough Surfaces in Sliding Motion

  • M. Prat
  • F. Plouraboué
  • N. Letalleur
Article

Abstract

The flow between rough surfaces in sliding motion with contacts between these surfaces, is analyzed through the volume averaging method. Assuming a Reynolds (lubrication) approximation at the roughness scale, an average flow model is obtained combining spatial and time average. Time average, which is often omitted in previous works, is specially discussed. It is shown that the effective transport coefficients, traditionally termed ‘flow factors’ in the lubrication literature, that appear in the average equations can be obtained from the solution to two closure problems. This allows for the numerical determination of flow factors on firmer bases and sheds light on some arguments to the literature. Moreover, fluid flows through fractures form an important subset of problems embodied in the present analysis, for which macroscopisation is given.

volume averaging Reynolds equations lubrication rough surfaces fracture flows 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler, P. M. and Brenner, H.: 1985, Spatially periodic suspensions of convex particles in linear shear flows i., Int. J. Multiphase Flow 11(3), 361–385.Google Scholar
  2. Adler, P. M., Zukovsky, M. and Brenner, H.: 1985, Spatially periodic suspensions of convex particles in linear shear flows ii., Int. J. Multiphase Flow 11, 387–417.Google Scholar
  3. Adler, P. M. and Thovert, J. F.: 1999, Fractures and Fracture Network, Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Bayada, G. and Chambat, M.: 1988, New models in the theory of the hydrodynamic lubrication of rough surfaces, J. Tribology 110, 402–407.Google Scholar
  5. Bayada, G. and Faure, J. B.: 1989, A double scale analysis approach of the reynolds roughness. comments and application to the journal bearing, J. Tribol. 111, 323–330.Google Scholar
  6. Chow, L. S. H. and Cheng, H. S.: 1976, The effect of surface roughness on the average film thickness between lubricated rollers, J. Lubric. Technol. 98, 117–124.Google Scholar
  7. Christensen, H.: 1970, Stochastic models for hydrodynamics lubrication of rough surfaces, Int. J. Mech. Eng. 104, 1022–1033.Google Scholar
  8. Elrod, H. G.: 1979, A general theory for laminar lubrication with reynolds roughness, J. Lubric. Technol. 101, 8–14.Google Scholar
  9. Frankel, T.: 1997, The Geometry of Physics: An Introduction, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gray, W. G.: 1993, Mathematical Tools for Changing Spatial Scales in the Analysis of Physical Systems, CRC Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gray, W. R.: 1975, A derivation of the equations for multiphase transport, Chem. Eng. Sci. 30, 229–233.Google Scholar
  12. Howes, S. and Whitaker, S.: 1985, The spatial averaging theorem revisited, Chem. Eng. Sci. 40, 1387–1392.Google Scholar
  13. Knoll, G., Rienacker, A., Lagemann, V. and Lechtape-Gruter, R.: 1998, Effect of contact deformation on flow factors, J. Tribology 120, 140–142.Google Scholar
  14. Letalleur, N., Plouraboué, F. and Prat, M.: 2000, Average flow model of rough surface lubrication: Flow factors for sinusoidal surfaces, submitted to J. of Tribology.Google Scholar
  15. Lunde, L. and Tonder, K.: 1997, Numerical simulation of the effects of three-dimensional roughness on hydrodynamic lubrication: Correlation coefficients, J. Tribology 119, 315–322.Google Scholar
  16. Mei, C. C. and Auriault, J. L.: 1989, Mechanics of heterogeneous porous media with several spatial scales, Proc. Roy. Soc. A. 426(91).Google Scholar
  17. Quintard, M. and Whitaker, S.: 1994, Transport in ordered and disordered porous media v:geometrical results for two-dimensional systems, Transport in Porous Media 15, 183–196.Google Scholar
  18. Patir, N. and Cheng, H. S.: 1978, An average flow model for determining effects of three dimensional roughness on partial hydrodynamic lubrication, J. Lubric. Technol. 100, 12–17.Google Scholar
  19. Patir, N. and Cheng, H. S.: 1979, Application of average flow model to lubrication between rough sliding surfaces, J. Lubric. Technol. 101, 220–229.Google Scholar
  20. Peeken, H. J., Knoll, G., Rienacker, A., Lang, J. and Schonen, R.: 1997, On the numerical determination of flow factors, J. Tribology 119, 259–264.Google Scholar
  21. Quintard, M. and Whitaker, S.: 1987, Ecoulement monophasique en milieu poreux:effet des heterogeneites locales, J. de Mecanique Theorique et Appliquée 6, 691–726.Google Scholar
  22. Whitaker, S.: 1999, The Method of Volume Averaging, Kluwer Academic Punlishers.Google Scholar
  23. Teale, J. L. and Lebeck, A. O.: 1980, An evaluation of the average flow model for surface roughness effects in lubrication, J. Lubric. Technol. 102, 360–367.Google Scholar
  24. Tripp, J. H.: 1983, Surface roughness effects in hydrodynamic lubrication: the flow factor method, J. Lubric. Technol. 105, 458–465.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Prat
    • 1
  • F. Plouraboué
    • 1
  • N. Letalleur
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut de Mécanique des FluidesToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations