Advertisement

Personal Area Networks: Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11?

  • P. Johansson
  • R. Kapoor
  • M. Kazantzidis
  • M. Gerla
Article

Abstract

Interconnecting all our electronic devices we carry around, such as cellular phones, PDAs, and laptops, with wireless links requires a cheap, low-power radio technology that still delivers good performance. In this context, the Bluetooth wireless technology was developed to meet the requirements introduced by these personal area networks (PANs). However, today we see a widespread deployment of wireless local area network (WLAN) radios (primarily IEEE 802.11b) also in small devices, such as PDAs. This paper will compare the PAN capabilities of a Bluetooth-based system with an IEEE 802.11b-based system. In order to focus the comparison on link and networking functionality, the IEEE 802.11b radio is assumed to be operating at the same power level as the Bluetooth radio (i.e., assuming a 0 dBm radio). Results are obtained by means of simulations in which throughput and delay are measured for multihop and overlaid PANs. Estimations on power usage are also given in the simulations. The results indicate that as the number of PANs increases, the Bluetooth-based PANs basically maintain the same bandwidth per PAN, while the corresponding IEEE 802.11-based PANs suffer significantly from the increased co-channel interference. However, for cases with a few co-channel-interfering PANs (2-3 PANs hosting about 10-15 nodes), the IEEE 802.11b-based PANs offer a higher bandwidth per user than the corresponding Bluetooth PANs, which corresponds to the difference in link bandwidth between the two systems. At high interference levels, the Bluetooth PAN offers a higher capacity than the IEEE 802.11 PAN. The latter also shows unfairness among TCP connections in the PAN at high loads. The energy efficiency, defined as successfully transmitted bits per energy unit, decreases sharply for IEEE 802.11 with increased number of PANs, while Bluetooth maintains a constant level. Packet delays are also shown to be more stable for the Bluetooth PAN than for the IEEE 802.11 PAN as the number of PANs increases.

Bluetooth 802.11 PAN scatternets performance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Specification of the Bluetooth System-Core vol. 1 v1.1, www.bluetooth.comGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANET). URL: http://www.ietf. org/html.charters/manet-charter.html. (2001-10-11). (Work in Progress).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Johansson, M. Kazantzidis, R. Kapoor, and M. Gerla, Bluetooth: An enabler for personal area networking, IEEE Network, Vol. 15, No. 5, September 2001.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    IEEE 802.15 Coexistence Task Group 2 (TG2) for Wireless Personal Area Networkse. URL: http://www.ieee802.org/15/pub/ TG2.html (2001-10-11). (Work in Progress).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    IEEE 802.11e, MAC Enhancements for Quality of Service, URL: http://www.ieee802.org/11/ (2001-10-11). (Work in Progress).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wireless Ethernet Compatibility Alliance, URL: http://www. weca.net/ (2001-10-11).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Frodigh, P. Johansson, and P. Larsson, Wireless ad hoc networking -The art of networking without a network, Ericsson Review, No. 4, 2000.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. C. Haartsen, Bluetooth: A new radio interface providing ubiquitous connectivity, IEEE VTC, 2000-Spring, pp. 107–111.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Capone, R. Kapoor, and M. Gerla, Efficient polling schemes for Bluetooth picocells, ICC, 2001.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Zürbes, W. Stahl, K. Matheus, and J. Haartsen, Radio network performance of Bluetooth, Proceedings of International Conference of Communications, New Orleans, June 2000.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. Salonidis, P. Bhagwat, L. Tassiulas, and R. LaMaire, Distributed topology construction of Bluetooth personal area networks, Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2001, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, April 22–26, 2001.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Basagni, I. Chlamtac, and G. V. Záruba, Bluetrees-Scatternet formation and routing in Bluetooth-based ad hoc networks, Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2001, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, April 22–26, 2001.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Das, A. Ghose, A. Razdan, H. Saran, and R. Shorey, Enhancing performance of asynchronous data traffic over the Bluetooth wireless ad-hoc network, Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2001, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, April 22–26, 2001.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Miklós, A. Rácz, Z. Turányi, A. Valkó, and P. Johansson, Performance aspects of Bluetooth scatternet formation, Poster session Mobihoc 2000, Boston, Massachusetts, August 11, 2000.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    N. Johansson, U. Körner, and L. Tassiulas, A distributed scheduling algorithm for a Bluetooth scatternet, Seventeenth International Teletraffic Congress, ITC' 17, Salvador da Bahia, Brazil, September 24–28, 2001.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Network simulator (NS-2), www-mash.cs.berkeley.edu/ns/Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    C. Perkins and E. Royer, Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing, Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, 1999, Proceedings, WMCSA '99, Second IEEE Workshop, 1999, pp. 90–100.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    P. T. Brady, A model for generating on-off speech patterns in twoway conversation, Bell System Technical Journal, pp. 2445–2471, Sept. 1969.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Socket Communications Bluetooth Card specifications, http://www.socketcom.com/product/bluetoothcard.htmGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Johansson
    • 1
  • R. Kapoor
    • 1
  • M. Kazantzidis
    • 1
  • M. Gerla
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCalifornia

Personalised recommendations