Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A multicriteria approach to reserve selection: addressing long-term biodiversity maintenance

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Existing complementarity-based reserve selection techniquesconcerned with maximal biodiversity representation within minimum landarea do not necessarily ensure the long-term maintenance ofbiodiversity. These approaches often ignore the maintenance of naturalprocesses, turnover of feature diversity and the need to minimisethreats within conservation areas. We address these three emergentissues in the identification of potential avian conservation areas inthe Northern Province of South Africa, by combining ordination andspatial autocorrelation analyses, as well as land transformation datainto complementarity-based reserve selection techniques. Existingconservation areas are biased and inefficient and complementarity-basedmethods do little to correct this skew. The inclusion of speciesassemblage structure as well as the underlying environmental gradientsensures a conservation area network that strives to maintain bothbiodiversity pattern and process. Spatial autocorrelation analysisallows for the identification of areas with high β diversity,important areas for the long-term maintenance of biodiversity. Theinclusion of land transformation data leads to viable conservation areanetworks and highlights areas of potential conflict between biodiversityconservation interests and human land-use issues. These combinedimprovements on complementarity-based reserve selection techniques bringus a step closer to ensuring the long-term maintenance of biodiversitywithin conservation areas in the northern province.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balmford A., Mace G.M. and Ginsberg J.R. 1998. The challenges to conservation in a changing world: putting processes on the map. In: Mace G.M., Balmford A. and Ginsberg J.R. (eds), Conservation in a Changing World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 1-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudry J. 1993. Landscape dynamics and farming systems: problems of relating patterns and predicting ecological changes. In: Bunce R.G.H., Ryszkowski L. and Paoletti M.G. (eds), Landscape Ecology and Agroecosystems. Lewis Publishers, London, pp. 21-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore A.C., Mentis M.T. and Scholes R.J. 1990. The origin and extent of nutrient enriched patches within a nutrient-poor savanna in South Africa. Journal of Biogeography 17: 463-470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray J.R. and Curtis J.T. 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs 27: 325-349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown J.H. 1995. Macroecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church R.L., Stoms D.M. and Davis F.W. 1996. Reserve selection as a maximal covering location problem. Biological Conservation 76: 105-112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowling R.M., Gibbs Russell G.E., Hoffman M.T. and Hilton-Taylor C. 1989. Patterns of plant species diversity in southern Africa. In: Huntley B.J. (ed.), Biotic Diversity in Southern Africa. Oxford University Press, Cape Town, South Africa, pp. 19-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowling R.M., Pressey R.L., Lombart A.T., Desmet P.G. and Ellis A.G. 1999. From representation to persistence: requirements for a suistainable system of conservation areas in the species-rich mediterranean-climate desert of southern Africa. Diversity and Distributions 5: 51-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Custi B., Polasky S., Williams P.H., Pressey R.L., Camm J.D., Kershaw M. et al. 1997. A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon. Biological Conservation 80: 83-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEAT 1997. White paper on the conservation and sustainable use of South Africa's biological diversity. Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, Pretoria, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale V.H., Pearson S.M., Offerman H.L. and O'Neill R.V. 1994. Relating patterns of land use change to faunal biodiversity in central Amazon. Conservation Biology 8: 1027-1036.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Benedetto L., Luciani F., Maugeri G., Poli Marchese E. and Razzara S. 1993. Role of natural vegetation in the agricultural landscape for biological conservation in Sicily. In: Bunce R.G.H., Ryszkowski L. and Paoletti M.G. (eds), Landscape Ecology and Agroecosystems. Lewis Publishers, London, pp. 131-138.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRI 1998. Arc and grid command references. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbanks D.H.K. and Thompson M.W. 1996. Assessing land-cover map accuracy for the South African land-cover database. South African Journal of Science 92: 465-470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbanks D.H.K., McGwire K.C., Cayocca K.D., LeNay J.T. and Estes J.E. 1996. Sensitivity to climate change of floristic gradients in vegetation communities. In: Goodchild M.F., Steyaert L.T., Parks B.O., Johnston C., Maidment D., Crane M. et al. (eds), GIS and Environmental Modelling: Progress and Research Issues. GIS World Books, Fort Collins, Colorado, pp. 135-140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbanks D.H.K., Thompson M.W., Vink D.E., Newby T., van den Berg H.M. and Everard D.A. 2000. The South African land-cover characteristics database: a synopsis of the landscape. South African Journal of Science 96: 69-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbanks D.H.K., Reyers B. and van Jaarsveld A.S. 2001. Species and environment representation: selecting reserves for the retention of avian diversity in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Biological Conservation 98: 365-379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith D.P. 1995. Biodiversity and regional sustainability analysis. CSIRO, Division of Wildlife and Ecology.

  • Faith D.P. and Walker P.A. 1996a. Environmental diversity: on the best possible use of surrogate data for assessing the relative biodiversity of sets of areas. Biodiversity and Conservation 5: 399-415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith D.P. and Walker P.A. 1996b. Integrating conservation and development: incorporating vulnerability into biodiversity-assessment of areas. Biodiversity and Conservation 5: 417-429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freemark K. 1995. Assessing effects of agriculture on terrestrial wildlife: developing a hierarchical approach for the US EPA. Landscape and Urban Planning 31: 99-115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freitag S., Nicholls A.O. and van Jaarsveld A.S. 1998. Dealing with established reserve networks and incomplete distribution data sets in conservation planning. South African Journal of Science 94: 79-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch H.G. 1982. Multivariate Analysis in Community Ecology. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison J.A. 1992. The Southern African Bird Atlas Project: five years of growth. South African Journal of Science 88: 410-413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison J.A., Allan D.G., Underhill L.G., Herremans M., Tree A.J., Parker V. et al. 1997. The Atlas of Southern African Birds.Vol. 1 and 2, BirdLife South Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa. 1 and 2.

  • Howard P.C., Viskanic P., Davenport T.R.B., Kigenyi F.W., Baltzer N., Dickinson C.J. et al. 1998. Complementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in Uganda. Nature 394: 472-475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudak A.T. 1999. Rangeland mismanagement in South Africa: failure to apply ecological knowledge. Human Ecology 27: 55-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntley B.J. 1998. The dynamic response of plants to environmental change and the resulting risks of extinction. In: Mace G.M., Balmford A. and Ginsberg J.R. (eds), Conservation in a Changing World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 69-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongman R.H.G., ter Braak C.J.F. and van Tongeren O.F.R. 1995. Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick J.B. 1983. An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example from Tasmania. Biological Conservation 25: 127-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombard A.T., Cowling R.M., Pressey R.L. and Mustart P.J. 1997. Reserve selection in a species-rich and fragmented landscape on the agulhas Plain, South Africa. Conservation Biology 11: 1101-1116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low A.B. and Rebelo A. 1996. Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, Pretoria, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald I.A.W. 1989. Man's role in changing the face of southern Africa. In: Huntley B.J. (ed.), Biotic diversity in Southern Africa. Concepts and Conservation. Oxford University Press, Cape Town, South Africa, pp. 51-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddock A. and du Plessis M.A. 1999. Can species data only be appropriately used to conserve biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation 8: 603-615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules C.R., Cresswell I.D. and Nicholls A.O. 1994. A scientific basis for establishing networks of protected areas. Systematics and Conservation Evaluation 50: 327-350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules C.R. and Pressey R.L. 2000. Review article: systematic conservation planning. Nature 405: 243-253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer B.A. 1998. Untangling Ecological Complexity: the Macroscopic Perspective. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nantel P., Bouchard A., Brouillet L. and Hay S. 1998. Selection of areas for protecting rare plants with integration of land use conflicts: a case study for the west coast of Newfoundland, Canada. Biological Conservation 84: 223-234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls A.O. 1998. Integrating population abundance, dynamics and distribution into broad-scale priority setting. In: Mace G.M., Balmford A. and Ginsberg J.R. (eds), Conservation in a Changing World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 251-272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss R.F. 1990. Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conservation Biology 4: 355-364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss R.F. 1996. Ecosystems as conservation targets. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer M. 1993. Putting things in better order: the advantages of canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 74: 2215-2230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters R.L. and Darling J.D. 1985. The greenhouse effect and nature reserves. Bioscience 35: 707-717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poore D. 1978. Ecosystem conservation. In: Sourcebook for a World Conservation Strategy Vol. 25. General assembly paper GA78/10 add. 4. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey R.L. 1992. Nature conservation in rangelands: lessons from research on reserve selection in New South Wales. Rangelands Journal 14: 214-226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey R.L. 1994. Land classifications are necessary for conservation planning but what do they tell us about fauna. In: Lunney D., Hand S., Reed P. and Butcher D. (eds), Future of the Fauna of Western New South Wales, Chapter 3. The Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Australia.

  • Pressey R.L. and Tully S.L. 1994. The cost of ad hoc reservation: a case study in western New South Wales. Australian Journal of Ecology 19: 375-384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey R.L., Humphries C.J., Margules C.R., Vane-Wright R.I. and Williams P.H. 1993. Beyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 124-128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebelo A.G. and Siegfried W.R. 1992. Where should nature reserves be located in the Cape floristic region, South Africa? Models for the spatial configuration of a reserve network aimed at maximizing the protection of floral diversity. Conservation Biology 6: 243-252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyers B., van Jaarsveld A.S. and Kruger M. 2000. Complementarity as a biodiversity indicator strategy. Proceedings of the Royal Society London, Series B 267: 505-513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues A.S.L., Tratt R., Wheeler B.D. and Gaston K.J. 1999. The performance of existing networks of conservation areas in representing biodiversity. Proceedings of the Royal Society London, Series B 266: 1453-1460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues A.S.L., Gregory R.D. and Gaston K.J. 2000. Robustness of reserve selection procedures under temporal species turnover. Proceedings of the Royal Society London, Series B 267: 49-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze R.E. 1998. South African Atlas of Agrohydrology and Climatology Water Research. Commission report TT82/ 96, Pretoria, South Africa.

  • Scott J.M., Csuti B., Estes J.E. and Anderson H. 1989. Status assessment of biodiversity protection. Conservation Biology 3: 85-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scotney D.M., Botha A.D.P., Cloete J.G., Cowan G., Dreyer L., Koch F.G.L. et al. 1988. Agricultural areas of southern Africa. In: Macdonald I.A.W. and Crawford R.J.M. (eds), Long-term Data Series Relating to Southern Africa's Renewable Natural Resources. South African National Scientific Programmes Report no. 157. CSIR, Pretoria, South Africa, pp. 316-336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soule M.S. 1991. Conservation: tactics for a constant crisis. Science 253: 744-750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taggart J.B. 1994. Ordination as an aid in determining priorities for plant community protection. Biological Conservation 68: 135-141.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak C.G.F. and Prentice I.C. 1988. A theory of gradient analysis. Advances in Ecological Research 18: 272-327.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak C.J.F. and Smilauer P. 1998. CANOCO Reference Manual and User's Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson M. 1996. The standard land-cover classification scheme for remote-sensing application in South Africa. South African Journal of Science 92: 34-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Jaarsveld A.S., Chown S.L., Erasmus B.F.N., Kshatriya M. and Wessels K.J. 2000. Vulnerability and adaptation assessment of South African animal taxa to climate change. Report to the Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, Pretoria, South Africa.

  • Virolainen K.M., Virola T., Suhonen J., Kuitunen M., Lammi A. and Siikamaki P. 1999. Selecting networks of nature reserves: methods do affect the long-term outcome. Proceedings of the Royal Society London, Series B 266: 1141-1146.

    Google Scholar 

  • WCMC 1992. Development of a National Biodiversity Index: a discussion paper prepared by World Conservation Monitoring Centre Report on the WCMC, 15 September.

  • Wessels K.J., Freitag S. and Van Jaarsveld A.S. 1999. The use of land facets as biodiversity surrogates during reserve selection at a local scale. Biological Conservation 89: 21-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels K.J., Reyers B., Kruger M. and van Jaarsveld A.S. 2000. Incorporating land cover information into regional biodiversity assessments in South Africa. Animal Conservation 3: 67-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker R.H. 1972. Evolution and the measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21: 213-251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker R.H. 1977. Evolution of species diversity in land communities. Evolutionary Biology 10: 1-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker R.H. and Niering W.A. 1965. Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona II, A gradient analysis of the south slope. Ecology 46: 429-452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickham J.D., Wu J. and Bradford D.F. 1997. A conceptual framework for selecting and analyzing stressor data to study species richness at large spatial scales. Environmental Management 21: 247-257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P.H. 1998. Key-sites for conservation area-selection methods for biodiversity. In: Mace G.M., Balmford A. and Ginsberg J.R. (eds), Conservation in a Changing World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 211-250.

  • Wiens J.A. 1989. The Ecology of Bird Communities, Vols 1 and 2. Cambridge Studies in Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Conservation Planning Unit, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa

    B. Reyers, D.H.K. Fairbanks & A.S. Van Jaarsveld

  2. Agricultural Research Council, Geo-Informatics Division, Institute for Soil, Climate and Water, Pretoria, Private Bag X79, South Africa

    K.J. Wessels

Authors
  1. B. Reyers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D.H.K. Fairbanks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K.J. Wessels
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A.S. Van Jaarsveld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reyers, B., Fairbanks, D., Wessels, K. et al. A multicriteria approach to reserve selection: addressing long-term biodiversity maintenance. Biodiversity and Conservation 11, 769–793 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015315405292

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015315405292

Search

Navigation