Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 205–217 | Cite as

Bullying as Unacknowledged Organizational Evil: A Researcher's Story

  • Margaret H. Vickers
Article

Abstract

The role of the sociopathic bully is considered in terms of his/her responsibility for acts of evil in organizations. First, the literature on bullying is considered with the suggestion made that the term “bully” may be something of a euphemism, contributing to the problem of bullying not being taken sufficiently seriously. Bullying is then considered as a means of torture in organizations. The case study is introduced, where the author—an academic—is daring to share her story. Several of Biderman's constructs of coercion (Amnesty International, 1975. Report on Torture. London: Gerald Duckworth.) are used to showcase the case material shared which, when taken together, depict the relentless and deliberate nature of the bullying that took place. The paper concludes with an evil outcome of the bullying but, also, the success of the target in surviving. Some practical considerations as to what to do if bullying takes place are considered.

bullying evil case study storytelling qualitative research 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Adams, G. B., & Balfour, D. L. (1998). Unmasking Administrative Evil. Thousand Oaks, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Alford, C. F. (1997). The political psychology of evil. Political Psychology, 18(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  3. Amnesty International (1975). Report on Torture. London: Gerald Duckworth. Concepts cited developed from Biderman's Chart of Coercion, 53.Google Scholar
  4. Ballard, M., Argus, T., & Remley, T. P. (1999). Bullying and school violence: A proposed prevention program. National Association of Secondary School Principals, NASSP Bulletin, 83(607), 38–47.Google Scholar
  5. Bochner, A. P. (1997). It's about time: Narrative and the divided self. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(4), 418–438.Google Scholar
  6. Bok, S. (1978). Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  7. Bok, S. (1982). Secrets. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, E. H. (1997). Improving organizational health by addressing organizational trauma. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 10(2), 175–178.Google Scholar
  9. Casella, R. (2000). The benefits of peer mediation in the context of urban conflict and program status. Urban Education, 35(3), 324–355.Google Scholar
  10. Ceglowski, D. (1997). That's a good story, but is it really research? Qualitative Inquiry, 3(2), 188–201.Google Scholar
  11. Chanen, J. S. (1999). Taking a bully by the horns. ABA Journal, 85(August), 90–91.Google Scholar
  12. Cohen, C. F. (1999). When managers mediate: Stuck in the middle with you. Dispute Resolution Journal, 54(3), 65–69.Google Scholar
  13. Cooper, C. (1999). In my opinion. Management Today, June, 14–15.Google Scholar
  14. Dunbar, C. (1999). Three short stories. Qualitative Inquiry, 5(1), 130–140.Google Scholar
  15. Felson, R. B. (2000). A social psychological approach to interpersonal aggression. In Van Hasselt, V. B.,& Hersen, M. (Eds.), Aggression and Violence: An Introductory Text, 9–22. Boston, London: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  16. Gabriel, Y. (1998). An introduction to the social psychology of insults in organizations. Human Relations, 51(11), 1329–1354.Google Scholar
  17. Glover, D., Cartwright, N., Gouch, G., & Johnson, M. (1998). The introduction of anti-bullying policies: Do policies help in the management of change? School Leadership and Management, 18(1), 89–105.Google Scholar
  18. House of Representatives Standing Committee on Employment, Education and Training 1994 (1995). Bullying and school violence: Nature and effect of school violence. In Healey, K. (Ed.), Conflict Resolution: Issues for the Nineties, 20–23. Sydney: The Spinney Press.Google Scholar
  19. Johnson, P. R., & Indvik, J. (1996). Stress and violence in the workplace. Employee Counselling Today, 8(1), 19–24.Google Scholar
  20. Katz, F. E. (1993). Ordinary People and Extraordinary Evil: A Report on the Beguilings of Evil. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kiesinger, C. E. (1998). From interview to story: Writing Abbie's life. Qualitative Inquiry, 4(1), 71–95.Google Scholar
  22. Ingram, S. (2000). Why bullies behave badly. Current Health, 27(3), 20–21.Google Scholar
  23. Lewis, J. (1995). Bullying and school violence: School bullies also found in staffrooms. In Healey, K. (Ed.), Conflict Resolution: Issues for the Nineties, 31. Sydney: The Spinney Press.Google Scholar
  24. Mann, R. (1996). Psychological abuse in the workplace. In McCarthy, P., Sheehan, M., & Wilkie, W. (Eds.), Bullying: From Backyard to Boardroom, 83–92. Sydney: Millennium Books, Beyond Bullying Association.Google Scholar
  25. Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Timewell, E., & Alexander, L. (1990). In-Depth Interviewing: Researching People. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.Google Scholar
  26. Monahan, D. M. (1999). Brutal bosses and their prey: How to identify and overcome abuse in the workplace. International Journal of Conflict Management, 10(1), 85–88.Google Scholar
  27. Nye, E. F. (1997). Writing as healing. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(4), 439–452.Google Scholar
  28. Oliver, R. L., Young, T. A., & La Salle, S. M. (1994). Early lessons in bullying and victimization: The help and hindrance of children's literature. The School Counsellor, 42, 137–146.Google Scholar
  29. Olweus, D. (1994). Bullying at school: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. Journal of Child Psychology, 35, 1171–1190.Google Scholar
  30. Quine, L. (1999).Workplace bullying inNHScommunity trust: Staff questionnaire survey. British Medical Journal, 318(7178), 228–232.Google Scholar
  31. Reber, A. S. (1985). The Penguin Dictionary of Psychology. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  32. Smith, B. (1999). The abyss: Exploring depression through a narrative of the self. Qualitative Inquiry, 5(2), 264–279.Google Scholar
  33. Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, 435–454. Thousand Oaks, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Stein, H. F. (1998). Euphemism, Spin, and the Crisis in Organizational Life. Westport: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
  35. Swisher, K. G. (1996). Why Indian people should be the ones to write about Indian education. American Indian Quarterly, 20(1), 83–90.Google Scholar
  36. van Manen, M. (1990). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. Ontario, Canada: The University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar
  37. Van Maanen, J. (1998). Different strokes: Qualitative research in the administrative science quarterly from 1956 to 1996. In Van Maanen, J. (Ed.), Qualitative Studies of Organizations: The Administrative Science Quarterly Series in Organization Theory and Behavior, ix-xxxii. Thousand Oaks, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Vickers, M. H. (1998). Life atwork with “invisible” chronic illness (ICI):Apassage of trauma-turbulent, random, poignant. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 20(2), 196–218.Google Scholar
  39. Vickers, M. H. (1999). “Sick organizations,” “rabid managerialism”: Work-life narratives from people with “invisible” chronic illness. Public Voices, 4(2), 59–82.Google Scholar
  40. Vickers, M. H. (2001). Work and Unseen Chronic Illness: Silent Voices. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Williams, C. (1992). Beyond Industrial Sociology: The Work of Men and Women. Sydney, Australia: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  42. Wondrak, R. (1999). Verbal abuse. In Turnbull, J., & Paterson, B. (Eds.), Aggression and Violence: Approaches to Effective Management, 79–94. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  43. Yamada, D. C. (2000). The phenomenon of “workplace bullying” and the need for status-blind hostile work environment protection. Georgetown Law Journal, 88(3), 475–536.Google Scholar
  44. Yandrick, R. M. (1999). Lurking in the shadows. HR Magazine, 44(10), 60–68.Google Scholar
  45. Zapf, D. (1999). Organizational,work group related and personal causes of mobbing/bullying atwork. International Journal of Manpower, 20(1/2), 70–85.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Margaret H. Vickers
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Management, College of Law and BusinessUniversity of Western SydneyPenrith South DCAustralia

Personalised recommendations