Periodica Mathematica Hungarica

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 111–126 | Cite as

Sublattices of regular elements

  • D. D. Anderson
  • E. W. Johnson
  • Richard L. Spellerberg II


Let L be an r-lattice, i.e., a modular multiplicative lattice that is compactly generated, principally generated, and has greatest element 1 compact. We consider certain subsets of L consisting of “regular elements”: \(L_f = \left\{ 0 \right\} \cup \left\{ A \right. \in \left. L \right|\left. {(0:A) = 0} \right\},L_{sr} = \left\{ 0 \right\} \cup \left\{ A \right. \in \left. L \right|\) there is a compact element \(X \leqslant A\) with \(\left. {(0:X) = 0} \right\},L_r = \left\{ 0 \right\} \cup \left\{ A \right. \in \left. L \right|\) there is a principal element \(X \leqslant A{\text{ with }}\left. {(0:X) = 0} \right\},{\text{ and }}L_{rg} = \left\{ 0 \right\} \cup \left\{ A \right. \in \left. L \right|A = \bigvee _\alpha X_\alpha {\text{ where each }}X_\alpha \) is a principal element with (0:X_{\alpha })=0\} . The first three subsets L_{f}, L_{sr}, and L_{r} are augmented filters \(\mathcal{L}^0 \) on L, i.e., \(\mathcal{L}^0 = \mathcal{L} \cup \left\{ 0 \right\}{\text{ where }}\mathcal{L}\) is a multiplicatively closed subset of $L$ with $A\in \(\mathcal{L}\) and $B\geq A$ with $B\in L$ implies $B\in \(\mathcal{L}\) and hence are sublattices of $L$ closed under multiplication. We first consider the more general situation of augmented filters on $L.$ These results are then applied to study the four previously defined subsets for $L$ an $r$-lattice or Noether lattice (i.e., an $r$-lattice with ACC). Finally, we give a brief discussion of how the results for augmented lattices can be applied to subsets of $L$ which are “regular” with respect to an $L$-module.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    D. D. Anderson, Distributive Noether lattices, Michigan Math. J. 22 (1975), 109–115.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    D. D. Anderson, Abstract commutative ideal theory without chain condition, Algebra Universalis 6 (1976), 131–145.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    D. D. Anderson, Fake rings, fake modules, and duality, J. Algebra 47 (1977), 425–432.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    D. D. Anderson and E. W. Johnson, Ideal theory in commutative semigroups, SemigroupForum 30 (1984), 127–158.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    D. D. Anderson and E. W. Johnson, Dilworth's principal elements, Algebra Universalis 36 (1996), 392–404.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    D. D. Anderson and J. Pascual, Regular ideals in commutative rings, sublattices of regular ideals, and Prüfer rings, J. Algebra 111 (1987), 404–426.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    K. P. Bogart, Structure theorems for regular local Noether lattices, Michigan Math. J. 15 (1968), 167–176.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    K. P. Bogart, Distributive local Noether lattices, Michigan Math. J. 16 (1969).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    R. P. Dilworth, Abstract commutative ideal theory, Pacific J. Math. 12 (1962), 481–498.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    E. W. Johnson, A-transforms of Noether lattices, Dissertation, University of California, Riverside, 1966.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    E. W. Johnson and J. P. Lediaev, Join principal elements in Noether lattices, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 36 (1972), 73–78.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    I. Kaplansky, Commutative Rings, revised ed., Polygonal Publishing House, Washington, N.J., 1994.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    R. L. Spellerberg II, Some problems in multiplicative lattice theory, Dissertation, The University of Iowa, 1990.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. D. Anderson
    • 1
  • E. W. Johnson
    • 1
  • Richard L. Spellerberg II
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsThe University of IowaIowa CityU.S.A.
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsSimpson CollegeIndianolaU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations