Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 1–17 | Cite as

Locked Into Gambling: Anticipatory Regret as a Motivator for Playing the National Lottery

Abstract

Four hundred and eighty-five people were asked about their intentions to play the National Lottery in England a week prior to the introduction of a new midweek draw. We predicted that those people who played the Saturday game with a regular set of numbers would be more inclined to play the new midweek game than those who had not established a routine of using the same set of numbers. We further predicted that their motivation to play would derive from a feeling of 'anticipatory regret'—a sense that they would find it intolerable to discover their regular numbers had been drawn when they hadn't purchased a ticket. Results supported both of these predictions, and an interpretation of the data is given in terms of the circumstances most likely to trigger such counterfactual reasoning.

gambling lottery counterfactual thinking anticipatory regret 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Augoustinos, M. and Walker, I. (1995). Social Cognition. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Clotfelter, C.T. and Cook, P.J. (1993). The gambler's fallacy in lottery play. Management Science, 39, 1521–1525.Google Scholar
  3. Davis, C.G., Lehman, D.R., Wortman, C.B., Silver, R.C. and Thompson, S.C. (1995). The undoing of traumatic life events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 109–124.Google Scholar
  4. Feldman, J., Miyamoto, J. and Loftus, E.F. (1999). Are actions regretted more than inactions? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78, 232–255.Google Scholar
  5. Gilovich, T. and Medvec, V.H. (1994). The temporal pattern to the experience of regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 357–365.Google Scholar
  6. Herring, M. and Bledsoe, T. (1994). A model of lottery participation-demographics, context and attitudes. Policy Studies Journal, 22, 245–257.Google Scholar
  7. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under certainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 201–208). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Kahneman, D. and Varey, C.A. (1990). Propensities and counterfactuals: the loser that almost won. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1101–1110.Google Scholar
  9. Langer, E. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 311–328.Google Scholar
  10. Markman, K.D., Gavanski, I., Sherman, S.J. and McMullen, M.N. (1993). The mental simulation of better and worse possible worlds. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 87–109.Google Scholar
  11. Medvec, V.H., Gilovich, T. and Madey, S.F. (1995). When less is more: counterfactual thinking and satisfaction among Olympic medalists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 603–610.Google Scholar
  12. Meyers-Levy, J. and Maheswaran, D. (1992). The influence of temporal distance on consumers' affective and persuasive responses. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 424–433.Google Scholar
  13. Miller, D.T. and Taylor, B.R. (1995). Counterfactual thought, regret and superstition: How to avoid kicking yourself. In N.J. Roese & J.M. Olson (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 305–331). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. News Release, 23 October. (1966). Office of the National Lottery: 2 Monck Street, London.Google Scholar
  15. Roese, N.J. (1994). The functional basis of counterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 805–818.Google Scholar
  16. Roese, N.J. (1997). Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 133–138.Google Scholar
  17. Salkovskis, P.M. (1966). Frontiers of Cognitive Therapy. New York: Guildford.Google Scholar
  18. Social Research Programme. (1977). Office of the National Lottery: 2 Monck Street, London.Google Scholar
  19. Wagenaar, W.A. (1988). Paradoxes of Gambling Behaviour. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  20. Weinstein, N.D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 806–820.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of PsychologyUniversity of NorthumbriaNewcastle-upon-TyneEngland
  2. 2.University of NorthumbriaEngland

Personalised recommendations