Skip to main content
Log in

For a Europe of flexible regions and not of region-states divided by ethnicity

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Discussion of the future of Europe continues to be a marginal political issue, partly because of the resistance of states, on both the practical (bureaucratic) and conceptual levels, created by the government leaders and heads of state. In turn, the nation-states are challenged from within by independent and separatist movements that have laid bare the fundamental hypocrisy of rhetorical discussions of the principle regarding the self-determination of peoples; interfering with states (and their borders) has proven to be a taboo for Europe. The growing flexibility of the globalised economy should be paralleled by a growing flexibility in the conception of the division and political organisation of territory, but this is not the case. Further inflexibility stems from the socio-economic inequity that we accept in our daily lives as normal, in particular as regards inequality in the use and division of territory. Equality, or better egaliberté (equality and liberty), is a sufficiently dynamic and flexible concept to be taken as a point of reference in envisaging the society, Europe, and world of tomorrow. It is only through the concept of egaliberté that we can imagine a Europe based on relations between regions that are conceived and organised on multiple scales and not as region-nations conceived on the basis of ethnicity or in the name of supposed cultural homogeneity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balibar E., 1993: Le frontiere della democrazia. Manifestolibri, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badie B., 1996: La fine dei territori. Asterios, Trieste.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balibar E. and Wallerstein I., 1996: Razza, Nazione, Classe, second revised edition. Edizioni Associate, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakely E.J. and Snyder M.G., 1997: Fortress America. Brooking Institution Press, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookchin M., 1993: Democrazia diretta. Elèuthera, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buonarroti F., 1971: Cospirazione per l'uguaglianza detta di Babeuf. Einaudi, Turin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassen B., 1996: 'Avec les peuples ou sans eux?' Le Monde Diplomatique, Mars, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahrendorf R., 1996: Diari europei. Laterza, Bari.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumont R., 1990: Un mondo intollerabile. Elèuthera, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eva F., 1992: 'Geografia contro il potere', Volontà, No. 4. Milan, pp. 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallusser W., 1994: Political Boundaries and Coexistence, proceedings of the IGU-Symposium of Basle (CH), Peter Lang, Berne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottmann J., 1952a: La Politique des Etats et leur géographie. Colin, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottmann J., 1955: Eléments de géographie politique. Le cours de Droit, Fascicules I et II, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottmann J., 1973: The Significance of Territory. University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropotkin P., 1979: Il mutuo appoggio. Edizioni della rivista Anarchismo, Catania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy J., 1999: Europa. Una geografia. Edizioni di Comunità, Ivrea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez R., 1996: 'Hautes murailles pour villes de riches', Le Monde Diplomatique, Mars, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malatesta E., 1924: 'Ancora di repubblica e rivoluzione', Pensiero e Volontà, Rome, No. 12, 15 June 1924.

  • Murphy A., 1993: 'Emerging regional linkages within the European Community: challenging the dominance of the state', Tijdschrift voor Econ. en Soc. Geografie 84, No. 2, Utrecht.

  • Ohmae K., 1996: La fine dello Stato-nazione. Baldini e Castoldi, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffestin C., 1989: 'L'immagine e la realtà della frontiera nella geografia contemporanea', Verso la pace della Scuola di pace di Boves, Ed. elle di ci, Leumann. Reprinted (1992) in Volontà No. 4, Milan, pp. 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramonet I., Giovannini F. and Ricoveri G., 1996: Il pensiero unico e i nuovi padroni del mondo. ASEC, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reclus E., 1905–8: L'Homme et la Terre. Librairie Universelle, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanguin A.L., 1993: Les Minorités ethniques en Europe. L'Harmattan, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A., 1993: Il tenore di vita. Marsilio, Venice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A., 1994: La diseguaglianza, il Mulino, Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toso F., 1996: Frammenti d'Europa. Baldini e Castoldi, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaccaro S., 1996: Anarchia e progettualità. Zero in condotta, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Various authors, 1995: Nationalisme & postnationalisme, Actes du Colloque qui s'est tenu à Namur le 30 avril 1994, Presses Universitaires de Namur.

  • Various authors, 1996: 'Economics and anarchism, anarchism and federalism', in The Raven, No. 31, Freedom Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eva, F. For a Europe of flexible regions and not of region-states divided by ethnicity. GeoJournal 52, 295–301 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014378606786

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014378606786

Navigation