Abstract
We apply a set of rules for theorizing developed to expand the “rigorous” methodology of quantitative research to Doug McAdam's Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970 (1982). We contend that the strength and breadth of McAdam's data and his application of that data to refute extant theories combined with his new flexible—perhaps overly so—concepts allowed political process theory (PPT) to rise to prominence in the field. We find his book to be a good example of how a single-case study, despite its shortcomings, can play a crucial role in the development of theory and the emergence of influential research paradigms.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Amenta, E. (1991). Making the most of the case study: Theories of the welfare state and the American experience. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 32, 172-194.
Amenta, E. (Forthcoming). Opportunity knocks: The trouble with political opportunity and what you can do about it. In J. Goodwin (Ed.), Opportunistic protest? Political opportunities and social movements.
Du Bois, W. E. B. ([1899] 1996). The Philadelphia Negro: A social study. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Gamson, W. (1975). The strategy of social protest. Homewood, IL: The Dorsey Press.
Goodwin, J., & Jasper, J.M. (1999). Caught in a winding, snarling vine: The structural bias of political process theory. Sociological Forum, 14, 27-54.
King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Laitin, D. A. (1995). Disciplining political science. American Political Science Review, 89, 454-456.
McAdam, D. (1982). Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930-1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McAdam, D. (1996). Conceptual origins, current problems, future directions. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings (pp. 23-40). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Meyer, D. S. (1999). Tending the vineyard: Cultivating political process research. Sociological Forum, 14, 79-92.
Munck, G. L. (1998). Canons of research design in qualitative analysis. Studies in Comparative International Development, 33, 18-45.
Popper, K. (1968). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Harper and Row.
Skocpol, T. (1979). States and social revolutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1968). Constructing social theories. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World, Inc.
Tarrow, S. (1996). States and opportunities: Political structuring of social movements. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings (pp. 62-92). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Armato, M., Caren, N. Mobilizing the Single-Case Study: Doug McAdam's Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Qualitative Sociology 25, 93–103 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014360308993
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014360308993