Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 297–320 | Cite as

Manipulations of the Features of Standard Video Lottery Terminal (VLT) Games: Effects in Pathological and Non-Pathological Gamblers

  • Pamela Loba
  • Sherry H. Stewart
  • Raymond M. Klein
  • James R. Blackburn
Article

Abstract

The present study was conducted to identify game parameters that would reduce the risk of abuse of video lottery terminals (VLTs) by pathological gamblers, while exerting minimal effects on the behavior of non-pathological gamblers. Three manipulations of standard VLT game features were explored. Participants were exposed to: a counter which displayed a running total of money spent; a VLT spinning reels game where participants could no longer “stop” the reels by touching the screen; and sensory feature manipulations. In control conditions, participants were exposed to standard settings for either a spinning reels or a video poker game. Dependent variables were self-ratings of reactions to each set of parameters. A set of 2(3) × 2 × 2 (game manipulation [experimental condition(s) vs. control condition] × game [spinning reels vs. video poker] × gambler status [pathological vs. non-pathological]) repeated measures ANOVAs were conducted on all dependent variables. The findings suggest that the sensory manipulations (i.e., fast speed/sound or slow speed/no sound manipulations) produced the most robust reaction differences. Before advocating harm reduction policies such as lowering sensory features of VLT games to reduce potential harm to pathological gamblers, it is important to replicate findings in a more naturalistic setting, such as a real bar.

VLT manipulations video lottery terminals pathological gambling harm reduction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Third edition-revised (DSM-III-R). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Fourth edition-revised (DSM-IV-R). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Beaudoin, C. M., & Cox, B. J. (1999). Characteristics of problem gambling in a Canadian context: A preliminary study using a DSM-IV-based questionnaire. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 44, 483-487.Google Scholar
  4. Cahalan, D., Cisin, I. H., & Crossley, H. M. (1969). American drinking practices: A national study of drinking behavior and attitudes. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies.Google Scholar
  5. Dickerson, M. (1990). Gambling: The psychology of a non-drug compulsion. Drug and Alcohol Review, 9, 187-199.Google Scholar
  6. Diskin, K. M., & Hodgins, D. C. (1999). Narrowing of attention and dissociation in pathological video lottery gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15, 17-28.Google Scholar
  7. Focal Research (1998). Nova Scotia Video Lottery Players' Survey 1997/98. Nova Scotia Department of Health, Problem Gambling Services.Google Scholar
  8. Griffiths, M. D. (1990). The acquisition, development and maintenance of fruit machine gambling in adolescence. Journal of Gambling Studies, 6, 193-204.Google Scholar
  9. Griffiths, M. D. (1993). Fruit machine gambling: The importance of structural characteristics. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9, 101-120.Google Scholar
  10. Ladouceur, R. (1999). The prevalence of pathological gambling in Canada. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12, 129-142.Google Scholar
  11. Ladouceur, R., Dube, D., & Bujold, A. (1994). Prevalence of pathological gambling and related problems among college students in the Quebec metropolitan area. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 39, 289-293.Google Scholar
  12. Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184-1188.Google Scholar
  13. Murray, J. B. (1993). Review of research in pathological gambling. Psychological Reports, 72, 791-810.Google Scholar
  14. Shaffer, H.J., Hall, M.N., & Vander Bilt, J. (1999). Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United States and Canada: A research synthesis. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1369-1376.Google Scholar
  15. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Stewart, S. H., Blackburn, J. R., & Klein, R. M. (2000). Against the odds: Establishment of a video lottery terminal research laboratory in a naturalistic setting. The Nova Scotia Psychologist, Spring, 3-6.Google Scholar
  17. Volberg, R. A. (1994). The prevalence and demographics of pathological gamblers: Implications for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 84, 237-241.Google Scholar
  18. White, S. (1989). Against the odds. Young People Now, April, 26-27.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pamela Loba
    • 1
  • Sherry H. Stewart
    • 2
  • Raymond M. Klein
    • 2
  • James R. Blackburn
    • 2
  1. 1.Dalhousie Gambling Laboratory, Department of PsychologyDalhousie University, Life Sciences CentreHalifaxCanada
  2. 2.Dalhousie UniversityCnada

Personalised recommendations