Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy

, Volume 81, Issue 1–2, pp 129–147 | Cite as

on the relationship between fast lyapunov indicator and periodic orbits for symplectic mappings

  • Elena Lega
  • Claude Froeschlé

Abstract

The computation on a relatively short time of a quantity, related to the largest Lyapunov Characteristic Exponent, called Fast Lyapunov Indicator allows to discriminate between ordered and weak chaotic motion and also, under certain conditions, between resonant and non resonant regular orbits. The aim of this paper is to study numerically the relationship between the Fast Lyapunov Indicator values and the order of periodic orbits. Using the two-dimensional standard map as a model problem we have found that the Fast Lyapunov Indicator increases as the logarithm of the order of periodic orbits up to a given order. For higher order the Fast Lyapunov Indicator grows linearly with the order of the periodic orbits. We provide a simple model to explain the relationship that we have found between the values of the Fast Lyapunov Indicator, the order of the periodic orbits and also the minimum number of iterations needed to obtain the Fast Lyapunov Indicator values.

chaotic motion Fast Lyapunov Indicator periodic orbits 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benettin, G., Galgani, L., Giorgilli, A. and Strelcyn, J. M.: 1980, ‘Lyapunov characteristic exponents for smooth dynamical systems; a method for computing all of them’, Meccanica 15: Part I: Theory, 9-20-Part 2: Numerical applications, 21-30.Google Scholar
  2. Chirikov, B. V.: 1960, Plasma Phys. 1, 253.Google Scholar
  3. Contopoulos, G. and Voglis, N.: 1997, ‘A fast method for distinguishing between order and chaotic orbits’, Astron. Astrophys. 317, 73-82.Google Scholar
  4. Froeschl´e, C.: 1970, ‘A numerical study of the stochasticity of dynamical systems with two degrees of freedom’, Astron. Astrophys. 9, 15-23.Google Scholar
  5. Froeschl´e, C.: 1984, ‘The Lyapunov characteristic exponents and applications’, J. de M´ec. th´eor. et apll.Numero sp´ecial, 101-132.Google Scholar
  6. Froeschl´e, C. and Lega, E.: 1998, ‘Twist angles: a fast method for distinguishing islands, tori and weak chaotic orbits. Comparison with other methods of analysis’, AA 334, 355-362.Google Scholar
  7. Froeschl´e, C., Lega, E. and Gonczi, R.: 1997, ‘Fast Lyapunov indicators. Application to asteroidal motion’, Celest. Mech. & Dyn. Astr. 67, 41-62.Google Scholar
  8. Froeschl´e, C. and Lega, E.: 2000, ‘On the structure of symplectic mappings. The Fast Lyapunov indicator: a very sensitive tool’, Celest. Mech. & Dyn. Astr. 78, 167-195.Google Scholar
  9. Froeschl´e, C., Guzzo, M. and Lega, E.: 2000, ‘Graphical evolution of the Arnold's web: from order to chaos’, Science 289-N.5487, 2108-2110.Google Scholar
  10. Greene, J. M.: 1979, ‘A method for determining a stochastic transition’, J. Math. Phys. 20, 1183 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Guzzo, M., Lega, E. and Froeschl´e, C.: 2001, ‘On the numerical detection of the effective stability of chaotic motions in quasi-integrable systems’, (in press).Google Scholar
  12. Laskar, J.: 1993, ‘Frequency analysis for multi-dimensional systems. Global dynamics and diffusion’, Physica D 67, 257-281.Google Scholar
  13. Laskar, J.: 1994, ‘Frequency map analysis of an Hamiltonian system’, Workshop on Non-Linear Dynamics in Particle Accelerators, September 1994, Arcidosso.Google Scholar
  14. Laskar, J., Froeschl´e, C. and Celletti, A.: 1992, ‘The measure of chaos by the numerical analysis of the fundamental frequencies’, Application to the standard mapping’ Physica D 56, 253.Google Scholar
  15. Lega, E. and Froeschl´e, C.: 1997, ‘Fast Lyapunov Indicators. Comparison with other chaos indicators. Application to two and four dimensional maps’, In: J. Henrard and R. Dvorak, (eds) The Dynamical Behaviour of our Planetary System, Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Lega, E. and Froeschl´e, C.: 1996, ‘Numerical investigations of the structure around an invariant KAM torus using the frequency map analysis’, Physica D 95, 97-106.Google Scholar
  17. LeVeque, W. J.: 1977, Fundamentals of Number Theory, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  18. Lichtenberg, A. J. and Lieberman, M. A.: 1983, Regular and Stochastic Motion, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Locatelli, U., Froeschl´e, C., Lega, E. and Morbidelli, A.: 2000, ‘On the relationship between the Bruno function and the breakdown of invariant tori’, Physica D 139, 48-71.Google Scholar
  20. MacKay, R. S.: 1993, Renormalisation in Area Preserving Maps, World Scientific.Google Scholar
  21. Mahler, K.: 1957, Lectures on Diophantine Approximations.Google Scholar
  22. Morbidelli, A. and Giorgilli, A.: 1995, ‘Superexponential stability of KAM tori’, J. Stat. Phys. 78, 1607 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Nekhoroshev, N. N.: 1977, ‘Exponential estimates of the stability time of near-integrable Hamiltonian systems’, Russ. Math. Surveys 32, 1-65.Google Scholar
  24. Olivera, A. and Sim´o, C.: 1987, ‘An obstruction method for the destruction of invariant curves’, Physica D 26, 181 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elena Lega
  • Claude Froeschlé

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations