Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Comparison of Experimental and Computational Methods for Mapping the Interactions Present in the Transition State for Folding of FKBP12

  • Published:
Journal of Biological Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The folding pathway of FKBP12, a 107 residue α/β protein, has been characterised in detail using a combination of experimental and computational techniques. FKBP12 follows a two-state model of folding in which only the denatured and native states are significantly populated; no intermediate states are detected. The refolding rate constant in water is 4 s-1 at 25 °C. Two different experimental strategies were employed for studying the transition state for folding. In the first case, a non-mutagenic approach was used and the unfolding and refolding of the wild-type protein measured as a function of experimental conditions such as temperature, denaturant, ligand and trifluoroethanol (TFE) concentration. These data suggest a compact transition state relative to the unfolded state with some 70% of the surface area buried. The ligand-binding site, whichis mainly formed by two long loops, is largely unstructured in the transition state. TFE experiments suggest that the α-helix may be formed in the transition state. The second experimental approach involved using protein engineering techniques with φ-value analysis. Residue-specific information on the structure and energetics of the transition state can be obtained by this method. 34 mutations were made at sites throughout the protein to probe the extent of secondary and tertiary structure in the transition state. In contrast to some other proteins of this size, no element of structure is fully formed in the transition state, instead, the transition state is similar to that found for smaller, single-domain proteins, such as chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 and the SH3 domainfrom α-spectrin. For FKBP12, the central three strands of the β-sheet (2, 4 and 5), comprise the most structured region of the transition state. In particular Val 101, which is one of the most highly buried residues and located in the middle of the central β-strand,makes approximately 60% of its native interactions. The outer β-strands, and the ends of the central β-strands are formed to a lesser degree. The short α-helix is largely unstructured in the transition state as are the loops. The data are consistent with a nucleation-condensation model of folding, the nucleus of which is formed by side chains within β-strands 2, 4 and 5 and the C-terminus of the α-helix. These residues are distant in the primary sequence, demonstrating the importance of tertiary interactions in the transition state. High-temperature molecular dynamic simulations on the unfoldingpathway of FKBP12 are in good agreement with the experimental results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sancho, J., Meiering, E. and Fersht, A.R.: Mapping Transition States of Protein Unfolding by Protein Engineering of Ligand-Binding Sites. J. Mol. Biol. 221 (1991), 1007–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chiti, F., Taddei, N., van Nuland, N.A.J., Magherini, F., Stefani, M., Ramponi, G. and Dobson, C.M.: Structural Characterisation of the Transition State for Folding of Muscle Acylphophatase. J. Mol. Biol. 283 (1998), 893–903.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chiti, F., Taddei, N., Webster, P., Hamada, D., Fiaschi, T., Ramponi, G. and Dobson, C.M.: Acceleration of the Folding of Acylphosphatase by Stabilisation of Local Secondary Structure. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6 (1999), 380–387.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fersht, A.R., Matouschek, A. and Serrano, L.: The Folding of an Enzyme. 1. Theory of Protein Engineering Analysis of Stability and Pathway of Protein Folding. J. Mol. Biol. 224 (1992), 771–782.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Daggett, V., Li, A.J., Itzhaki, L.S., Otzen, D.E. and Fersht, A.R.: Structure of the Transition-State for Folding of a Protein-Derived from Experiment and Simulation. J. Mol. Biol. 257 (1996), 430–440.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li, A.J. and Daggett, V.: Identification and Characterization of the Unfolding Transition-State of Chymotrypsin Inhibitor 2 by Molecular-Dynamics Simulations. J. Mol. Biol. 257 (1996), 412–429.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ladurner, A.G., Itzhaki, L.S., Daggett, V. and Fersht, A.R.: Synergy between Simulation and Experiment in Describing the Energy Landscape of Protein Folding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95 (1998), 8473–8478.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Daggett, V., Li, A.J. and Fersht, A.R.: Combined Molecular Dynamics and Phi-Value Analysis of Structure-Rreactivity Relationships in the Transition State and Unfolding Pathway of Barnase: Structural Basis of Hammond and Anti-Hammond Effects. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 120 (1998), 12740–12754.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Egan, D.A., Logan, T.M., Liang, H., Matayoshi, E., Fesik, S.W. and Holzman, T.F.: Equilibrium Denaturation of Recombinant Human FK506 Binding Protein in Urea. Biochemistry 32 (1993), 1920–1927.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Logan, T., Theriault, Y. and Fesik, S.: Structural Characterization of the FK506 Binding-Protein Unfolded in Urea and Guanidine-Hydrochloride. J. Mol. Biol. 236 (1993) 637–648.

    Google Scholar 

  11. van Duyne, G.D., Standaert, R.F., Karplus, P.A., Schreiber, S.L. and Clardy, J.: Atomic-Structure of FKBP-FK506, An Immunophilin-Immunosuppressant Complex. Science 252 (1991), 839–842.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Michnick, S.W., Rosen, M.K., Wandless, T.J., Karplus, M. and Schreiber, S.L.: Solution Structure of FKBP, a Rotamase Enzyme and Receptor for FK506 and Rapamycin. Science 252 (1991), 836–842.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jackson, S.E. and Fersht, A.R.: Folding of Chymotrypsin Inhibitor-2. 1. Evidence for a Two-State Transition. Biochemistry 30 (1991), 10428–10435.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fersht, A.R.: Optimization of Rates of Protein Folding: The Nucleation-Collapse Mechanism for the Folding of Chymotrypsin Inhibitor 2 (CI2) and Its Consequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92 (1995), 10869–10873.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jackson, S.E.: How Do Small Single-Domain Proteins Fold? Folding & Design 3 (1998), R81-R90.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Munoz, V. and Eaton, W.A.: A Simple Model for Calculating the Kinetics of Protein Folding from Three-Dimensional Structures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 (1999), 11311–11316.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Main, E.R.G., Fulton, K.F. and Jackson, S.E.: Folding of FKBP12: Pathway of Folding and Characterisation of the Transition State. J. Mol. Biol. 291 (1999), 429–444.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Khorasanizadeh, S., Peters, I.D. and Roder, H.: Evidence for a Three-State Model of Protein Folding from Kinetic Analysis of Ubiquitin Variants with Altered Core Residues. Nature Struct. Biol. 3 (1996), 193–205.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chen, B., Baase, W.A. and Schellman, J.A.: Low Temperature Unfolding of a Mutant of Phage T4 Lysozyme. 2. Kinetic investigations. Biochemistry 26 (1989), 691–699.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fulton, K.F., Main, E.R.G., Daggett, V. and Jackson, S.E.: Mapping the Interactions Present in the Transition State for Folding/Unfolding of FKBP12. J. Mol. Biol. 291 (1999), 445–461.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jackson, S.E., el Masry, N. and Fersht, A.R.: Structure of the Hydrophobic Core in the Transition State for Folding of Chymotrypsin Inhibitor 2: A Critical Test of the Protein Engineering Method of Analysis. Biochemistry 32 (1993), 11270–11278.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Main, E.R.G., Fulton, K.F. and Jackson, S.E.: The Context-Dependent Nature of Destabilising Mutations on The Stability of FKBP12. Biochemistry 37 (1998), 6145–6153.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Li, A.J. and Daggett, V.: Characterization Of The Transition-State Of Protein Unfolding By Use Of Molecular-Dynamics-Chymotrypsin Inhibitor-2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91 (1994), 10430–10434.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Main, E.R.G. and Jackson, S.E.: Does Trifluoroethanol Affect Folding Pathways and Can It be Used as a Probe of Structure in Transition States? Nature Struct. Biol. 6 (1999), 831–835.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kentsis, A. and Sosnick, T.R.: Trifluoroethanol Promotes Helix Formation by Destabilizing Backbone Exposure: Desolvation Rather than Native Hydrogen Bonding Defines the Kinetic Pathway of Dimeric Coiled Coil Folding. Biochemistry 37 (1998), 14613–14622.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ionescu, R.M. and Matthews, C.R.: Folding under the Influence. Nature Struct. Biol. 6 (1999), 304–307.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Walgers, R., Lee, T.C. and CammersGoodwin, A.: An Indirect Chaotropic Mechanism for the Sstabilization of Helix Cconformation of Peptides in Aqueous Trifluoroethanol and Hexafluoro-2-Propanol. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 120 (1998), 5073–5079.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Storrs, R.W., Truckses, D. and Wemmer, D.E.: Helix Propagation in Trifluoroethanol Solutions. Biopolymers 32 (1992), 1695–1702.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Matouschek, A., Kellis, J.T. Jr., Serrano, L. and Fersht, A.R.: Mapping the Transition State and Pathway of Protein Folding by Protein Engineering. Nature 342 (1989), 122–126.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Matouschek, A., Kellis, J.T. Jr., Serrano, L., Bycroft, M. and Fersht, A.R.: Transient Folding Intermediates Characterized by Protein Engineering. Nature 346 (1990), 440–445.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Serrano, L., Matouschek, A. and Fersht, A.R.: The Folding of an Enzyme. 3. Structure of the Transition State for Unfolding of Barnase Analysed by a Protein Engineering Procedure. J. Mol. Biol. 224 (1992), 805–818.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Itzhaki, L.S., Otzen, D.E. and Fersht, A.R.: The Structure of the Transition State for Folding of Chymotrypsin Inhibitor 2 Analysed by Protein Engineering Methods: Evidence for a Nucleation-Collapse Mechanism for Protein Folding. J. Mol. Biol. 254 (1995), 260–288.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Viguera, A.R., Serrano, L. and Wilmanns, M.: Different Folding Transition-States May Result In The Same Native Structure. Nat. Struct. Biol. 3 (1996), 874–880.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Grantcharova, V.P., Riddle, D.S., Santiago, J.V. and Baker, D.: Important Role of Hydrogen Bonds in the Structurally Polarized Transition State for Folding of the src SH3 Domain. Nat. Struct. Biol. 5 (1998), 714–720.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lopez-Hernandez, E. and Serrano, L.: Structure of the Transition State for Folding of the 129 aa Protein CheY Resembles that of a Smaller Protein, CI-2. Folding & Design 1 (1996), 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Villegas, V., Martinez, J.C., Aviles, F.X. and Serrano, L.: Structure of the Transition State in the Folding Process of Human Procarboxypeptidase A2 Activation Domain. J. Mol. Biol. 283 (1998), 1027–1036.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Matthews, J.M. and Fersht, A.R.: Exploring the Energy Surface of Protein Folding by Structure-Reactivity Relationships and Engineered proteins: Observation of Hammond Behaviour for the Gross Structure of the Transition State and Anti-Hammond Behaviour for Structural Elements for Unfolding/Folding of Barnase. Biochemistry 34 (1995), 6805–6814.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Miranker, A., Radford, S.E., Karplus, M. and Dobson, C.M.: Demonstration by NMR of Folding Domains in Lysozyme. Nature 349 (1991), 633–636.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Radford, S.E., Dobson, C.M. and Evans, P.A.: The Folding of Hen Lysozyme Involves Partially Structured Intermediates and Multiple Pathways. Nature 358 (1992), 302–307.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Callihan, D. and Logan, T.M.: Conformations of Peptide Fragments from the FK506 Binding Protein: Comparison with the Native and Urea-Unfolded States. J. Mol. Biol. 285 (1999), 2161–2175.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Fersht, A.R.: Nucleation Mechanisms in Protein Folding. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7 (1997), 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wetlaufer, D.B.: Nucleation, Rapid Folding, and Globular Intrachain Regions in Proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70 (1973), 697–701.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wetlaufer, D.B.: Nucleation in Protein Folding-Confusion of Structure and Process. Trends Biochem. Sci. 15 (1990), 414–415.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wang, A. and Bolen, D.W.: A Naturally Occurring Protective System in Urea-Rich Cells: Mechanism of Osmolyte Protection of Proteins Against Urea Denaturation. Biochemistry 36 (1997), 9101–9108.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kraulis, P.: Molscript, a Program to Produce Both Detailed and Schematic Plots of Protein Structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24 (1991), 946–950.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Merritt, E.A. and Murphy, M.E.P.: Raster3D Version-2.0-A Program For Photorealistic Molecular Graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D. 50 (1994), 869–873.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cambridge University Chemical Laboratory, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, U.K

    E.R.G. Main, KATE F. Fulton & S.E. Jackson

  2. Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195-7610

    VALERIE Daggett

Authors
  1. E.R.G. Main
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. KATE F. Fulton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. VALERIE Daggett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S.E. Jackson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Main, E., Fulton, K.F., Daggett, V. et al. A Comparison of Experimental and Computational Methods for Mapping the Interactions Present in the Transition State for Folding of FKBP12. Journal of Biological Physics 27, 99–117 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013137924581

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013137924581

Search

Navigation