Skip to main content
Log in

Deorbiting with electrodynamic tethers: comparison between different tether configurations

  • Published:
Space Debris

Abstract

Electrodynamic tethers have been recently proposed for satellite and rocket upper stage deorbiting to mitigate the debris problem at Low Earth Orbits (LEOs). The deorbiting performance of several electrodynamic tethers, where the electron collection from the ionosphere is obtained with either simple bare wires or bare wires terminated with conducting spherical collectors, was analyzed and compared. Our results indicate that the use of the spherical collectors at the positive termination of the system significantly enhances the deorbiting capabilities of the electrodynamic bare tethers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • L. Anselmo and C. Pardini. Assessing the Impact Risk of Orbital Debris on Space Tethers. Space Debris, 1: 87–98, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Anselmo, A. Rossi and C. Pardini. Updated Results of the Long Term Evolution of the Space Debris Environment. Advances in Space Research, 23: 201–211, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Dobrowolny, G.Vannaroni and F. DeVenuto. Electron Collection by a Charged Satellite in the Ionospheric Plasma. Il Nuovo Cimento, 22C: 207, 1999.

  • M. Dobrowolny, G. Vannaroni and F. DeVenuto. Electrodynamic Deorbiting of LEO Satellites. Il Nuovo Cimento, 23C: 85, 2000.

  • W.B. Hanson. Structure of the Ionosphere. In F.S. Johnson, editor, Satellite Environment Handbook, Standford University Press, Stanford, CA, pages 21–49, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Hershkowitz. How Langmuir Probes Work. In O. Auciello and D.L. Flamm, editors, Plasma Diagnostics Vol. 1. Academic Press, N.Y., pages 113–183, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.P. Hoyt and R.L. Forward. The Hoytether: A Failsafe Multiline Space Tether Structure. In Proceeding of Tether Technology Interchange Meeting, NASA/CP-1998-206900, pages 369–378, 1998.

  • L. Iess, C. Bruno, C. Ulivieri, G. Vannaroni, B. Bertotti, L. Anselmo, U. Ponzi, M. Dobrowolny, F. DeVenuto, M. Parisse and G. Laneve. Satellite De-Orbiting by Means of Electrodynamic Tethers: General Concepts and Requirements, Paper IAF-98-S.6.05. In 49th International Astronautical Congress, Melbourne, Australia, September 28–October 2, 1998.

  • L. Johnson and J. Ballance. Propulsive Small Expendable Deployer System (ProSEDS) Space Demonstration. In Proceeding of the Tether Technology Interchange Meeting, NASA/CP-1998-206900, pages 103–108, 1998.

  • I. Langmuir and K. Blodgett. Current Limited by Space Charge Flow between Concentric Spheres. Physical Review, 24: 49, 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Vannaroni, M. Dobrowolny, J.P. Lebreton, E. Melchioni, F. DeVenuto, C.C. Harvey, L. Iess, U. Guidoni, C. Bonifazi and F. Mariani. Current-Voltage Characteristics of the TSS-1R Satellite: Comparison with Isotropic and Anisotropic Models. Geophysical Research Letters, 25: 749, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • G.Vannaroni, M. Dobrowolny, F. DeVenuto and L. Iess. Electrodynamic Tethers for Deorbiting Applications, Paper IAA-99-IAA.6.6.08. In 50th International Astronautical Congress, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 4–8, 1999a.

  • G. Vannaroni, M. Dobrowolny and F. DeVenuto. The Use of Electrodynamic Tethers to Deorbit LEO Spacecraft. Report of Istituto Fisica Spazio Interplanetario, Rome (Italy), IFSI-99-6, June 1999b.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vannaroni, G., Dobrowolny, M. & De Venuto, F. Deorbiting with electrodynamic tethers: comparison between different tether configurations. Space Debris 1, 159–172 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012570808078

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012570808078

Navigation