Skip to main content
Log in

Superintendent Evaluation in a Standards-Based Environment: A Status Report from the States*

  • Published:
Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the current political climate, in which accountability and standards-based reform represent the educational centerpiece, a renewed interest has emerged in superintendent evaluation as a focal point for school improvement. This paper examines the current state-of-the-art of superintendent evaluation. Findings from the study suggest that despite the recommendations for personnel evaluation standards proposed by The Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (1988), 8 of the 50 state AASA/NSBA affiliates do not have requirements or guidelines for the evaluation of the superintendent. Evaluation materials provided by the affiliates in the other 42 states do not meet all of the essential criteria for quality personnel evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Association of School Administrators. (1980). Evaluating the Superintendent. Arlington, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association of School Administrators. (1993). Professional Standards for the Superintendency. Arlington, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, B.L. (2001). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences, 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.D., & Lewis, M.F. (1999). Designing an Effective, Systemic Superintendent Evaluation. 1999 Conference on Education. American Association of School Administration.

  • Candoli, I.C., Cullen, K., & Stufflebeam, D.L. (1997). Superintendent Performance Evaluation: Current Practice and Directions for Improvement. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, G.R., & Cunningham, W.G. (1997). The American School Superintendent: Leading in an Age of Pressure. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Chief State School Officers. (1996). Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium: Standards for School Leaders. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiPaola, M.F., & Stronge, J.H. (2001). Credible Evaluation: Not yet State-of-the-Art. The School Administrator, 58, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, T.E., Bjork, L., & Brunner, C.C. (2000). The 2000 Study of the American School Superintendency. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grote, D. (1996). The Complete Guide to Performance Appraisal. New York: American Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horler, B. A Comparison of Criteria Used in the Evaluation of the Superintendency in Illinois as Perceived by School Board Presidents and Public School Superintendents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb.

  • Hoyle, J.R., English, F.W., & Steffy, B.E. (1998). Skills for Successful 21st Century School Leaders: Standards for Peak Performers. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, J.R., & Skrla, L. (1999). The Politics of Superintendent Evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S.M. (1996). Leading to Change: The Challenge of the New Superintendency. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint AASA-NSBA Committee (1980). Evaluating the Superintendent. Arlington, Virginia: American Association of School Administrators

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (D.L. Stufflebeam, Chair). (1988). The Personnel Evaluation Standards: How to Assess Systems for Evaluating Educators. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, B.A. (1994). Set Fair Rules and Stick to Them. The American School Board Journal.

  • National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (1995). NCATE Approved Curriculum Guidelines. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National School Boards Association. Superintendent Evaluation: Keys to School Boardsmanship—a Program for Continuing Education for School Board Members.

  • Robinson, G.E., & Bickers, P.M. (1990). Evaluation of Superintendents and School Boards. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M. (July, 1994). Duties of the Teacher. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8(2), 151-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, R.R., & Regnier, P. (1998). The Superintendent of the Future. Gaithersburg, MD: An Aspen Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spring, J. (1998). Conflict of Interests: Politics of American Education. Boston: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stufflebeam, D.L. (1994). Superintendent Performance Evaluations: A National Research Center Proposes a Direction for Improvement. The School Administrator.

  • Stronge, J.H. (1997). Improving Schools Through Teacher Evaluation. In J.H. Stronge (Ed.) Evaluating Teaching: A Guide to Current Thinking and Best Practice. (pp. 1-23). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stronge, J.H., & Tucker, P.D. (1995). Performance Evaluation of Professional Support Personnel: A Survey of the States. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 9, 123-137.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DiPaola, M., Stronge, J.H. Superintendent Evaluation in a Standards-Based Environment: A Status Report from the States*. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 15, 97–110 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012439728953

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012439728953

Keywords

Navigation