Abstract
In the current political climate, in which accountability and standards-based reform represent the educational centerpiece, a renewed interest has emerged in superintendent evaluation as a focal point for school improvement. This paper examines the current state-of-the-art of superintendent evaluation. Findings from the study suggest that despite the recommendations for personnel evaluation standards proposed by The Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (1988), 8 of the 50 state AASA/NSBA affiliates do not have requirements or guidelines for the evaluation of the superintendent. Evaluation materials provided by the affiliates in the other 42 states do not meet all of the essential criteria for quality personnel evaluation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Association of School Administrators. (1980). Evaluating the Superintendent. Arlington, VA: Author.
American Association of School Administrators. (1993). Professional Standards for the Superintendency. Arlington, VA: Author.
Berg, B.L. (2001). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences, 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Buchanan, J.D., & Lewis, M.F. (1999). Designing an Effective, Systemic Superintendent Evaluation. 1999 Conference on Education. American Association of School Administration.
Candoli, I.C., Cullen, K., & Stufflebeam, D.L. (1997). Superintendent Performance Evaluation: Current Practice and Directions for Improvement. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Carter, G.R., & Cunningham, W.G. (1997). The American School Superintendent: Leading in an Age of Pressure. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Council of Chief State School Officers. (1996). Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium: Standards for School Leaders. Washington, DC: Author.
DiPaola, M.F., & Stronge, J.H. (2001). Credible Evaluation: Not yet State-of-the-Art. The School Administrator, 58, 2.
Glass, T.E., Bjork, L., & Brunner, C.C. (2000). The 2000 Study of the American School Superintendency. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
Grote, D. (1996). The Complete Guide to Performance Appraisal. New York: American Management Association.
Horler, B. A Comparison of Criteria Used in the Evaluation of the Superintendency in Illinois as Perceived by School Board Presidents and Public School Superintendents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb.
Hoyle, J.R., English, F.W., & Steffy, B.E. (1998). Skills for Successful 21st Century School Leaders: Standards for Peak Performers. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
Hoyle, J.R., & Skrla, L. (1999). The Politics of Superintendent Evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13, 4.
Johnson, S.M. (1996). Leading to Change: The Challenge of the New Superintendency. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Joint AASA-NSBA Committee (1980). Evaluating the Superintendent. Arlington, Virginia: American Association of School Administrators
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (D.L. Stufflebeam, Chair). (1988). The Personnel Evaluation Standards: How to Assess Systems for Evaluating Educators. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Mitchell, B.A. (1994). Set Fair Rules and Stick to Them. The American School Board Journal.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (1995). NCATE Approved Curriculum Guidelines. Washington, DC: Author.
National School Boards Association. Superintendent Evaluation: Keys to School Boardsmanship—a Program for Continuing Education for School Board Members.
Robinson, G.E., & Bickers, P.M. (1990). Evaluation of Superintendents and School Boards. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.
Scriven, M. (July, 1994). Duties of the Teacher. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8(2), 151-184.
Spillane, R.R., & Regnier, P. (1998). The Superintendent of the Future. Gaithersburg, MD: An Aspen Publication.
Spring, J. (1998). Conflict of Interests: Politics of American Education. Boston: McGraw Hill.
Stufflebeam, D.L. (1994). Superintendent Performance Evaluations: A National Research Center Proposes a Direction for Improvement. The School Administrator.
Stronge, J.H. (1997). Improving Schools Through Teacher Evaluation. In J.H. Stronge (Ed.) Evaluating Teaching: A Guide to Current Thinking and Best Practice. (pp. 1-23). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Stronge, J.H., & Tucker, P.D. (1995). Performance Evaluation of Professional Support Personnel: A Survey of the States. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 9, 123-137.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
DiPaola, M., Stronge, J.H. Superintendent Evaluation in a Standards-Based Environment: A Status Report from the States*. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 15, 97–110 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012439728953
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012439728953