Skip to main content
Log in

Criteria to Compare Estimation Methods of Regionalized Compositions

  • Published:
Mathematical Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The additive logratio (alr) transformation has been used in several case studies to predict regionalized compositions using standard geostatistical estimation methods such as ordinary kriging and ordinary cokriging. It is a simple method that allows application to transformed data all the body of knowledge available for geostatistical analysis of coregionalizations without a constant sum constraint. To compare the performance of methods, it is customary to use a univariate crossvalidation approach based on the leaving-one-out technique to evaluate the performance for each attribute separately. For multivariate observations this approach is difficult to interpret in terms of overall performance. Therefore, we propose using appropriate distances in real space and in the simplex, to improve the crossvalidation approach and, going a step forward, to adapt the concept of stress from multidimensional scaling to obtain a global measure of performance for each method. The Lyons West oil field of Kansas is used to illustrate the impactof using different distances in the performance of ordinary kriging versus ordinary cokriging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aitchison, J., 1986, The statistical analysis of compositional data, Monographs on statistics and applied probability: Chapman & Hall, London, 416 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitchison, J., 1997, The one-hour course in compositional data analysis or compositional data analysis is simple, in Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., ed., Proceedings of IAMG'97--The third annual conference of the International Association for Mathematical Geology,Vols. I, II and addendum: International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering (CIMNE), Barcelona (E), p. 3–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, R. J., 1991, The variogram sill and the sample variance: Math. Geol., v. 23, no. 4, p. 673–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buccianti, A., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., Barceló-Vidal, C., and Jarauta-Bragulat, E., 1999, Visualization and modeling of natural trends in ternary diagrams: A geochemical case study, in Lippard, S. J., Næss, A., and Sinding-Larsen, R., eds., Proceedings of IAMG'99--The fifth annual conference of the International Association for Mathematical Geology, Vols. I and II: Tapir, Trondheim, p. 139–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckles, R. S., 1965, Correlating and averaging connate water saturation data: J. Can. Pet. Technol., v. 4, no. 1, p. 42–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B. M., 1987, Uses and abuses of cross-validation in geostatistics: Math. Geol., v. 19, no. 3, p. 241–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Gruijter, J. J., Walvoort, D. J. J., and van Gaans, P. F. M., 1997, Continuous soil maps--A fuzzy set approach to bridge the gap between aggregation levels of process and distribution models: Geoderma, v. 77, p. 169–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diggle, P. J., Tawn, J. A., and Moyeed, R. A., 1998, Model-based geostatistics (with discussion): J. R. Stat. Soc., Ser. C (Appl. Stat.), v. 47, no. 3, p. 299–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehm, A. E., 1965, Lyons West field: Kansas oil and gas fields, Technical report: Kansas Geological Society, p. 146–156.

  • Jobson, J. D., 1992, Applied multivariate data analysis, Vol. II: Categorical and multivariate analysis: Springer-Verlag, New York, 731 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krzanowski, W. J., 1988, Principles of multivariate analysis: A user's perspective, Vol. 3 of Oxford statistical science series: Clarendon Press, Oxford, 563 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, X., and Yao, T., 2001, A program for 2D modeling (cross)correlogram tables using Fast Fourier Transform: Computers & Geosciences, v. 27, no. 7, p. 763–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Fernández, J. A., Barceló-Vidal, C., and Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., 1998, Measures of difference for compositional data and hierarchical clustering methods, in Buccianti, A., Nardi, G., and Potenza, R., eds., Proceedings of IAMG'98--The fourth annual conference of the International Association for Mathematical Geology, Vols. I and II: De Frede Editore, Napoli, p. 526–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Fernández, J. A., Bren, M., Barceló-Vidal, C., and Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., 1999, A measure of difference for compositional data based on measures of divergence, in Lippard, S. J., Næss, A., and Sinding-Larsen, R., eds., Proceedings of IAMG'99--The fifth annual conference of the International Association for Mathematical Geology, Vols. I and II: Tapir, Trondheim, p. 211–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olea, R. A., 1999, Geostatistics for engineers and earth scientists: Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, 303 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowsky, V., 1989, Cokriging of regionalized compositions: Math. Geol., v. 21, no. 5, p. 513–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowsky, V., and Burger, H., 1992, Spatial structure analysis of regionalized compositions: Math. Geol., v. 24, no. 6, p. 675–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowsky, V., Olea, R., and Davis, J. C., 1995, Estimation of regionalized compositions: Acomparison of three methods: Math. Geol., v. 27, no. 1, p. 105–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, T., and Journel, A. G., 1998, Automatic modeling of (cross) covariance tables using Fast Fourier Transform: Math. Geol., v. 30, no. 6, p. 589–615.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martín-Fernández, J.A., Olea-Meneses, R.A. & Pawlowsky-Glahn, V. Criteria to Compare Estimation Methods of Regionalized Compositions. Mathematical Geology 33, 889–909 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012293922142

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012293922142

Navigation