This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
REFERENCES
Campos, P. F.: 1993, 'Advocacy and Scholarship', California Law Review 81, 817–861.
Christine, G.: 1986, 'The Universal Audience and Predictive Theories of Law', Law and Philosophy 5, 343–350.
Cornell, D.: 1992, 'From the Lighthouse: The Promise of Redemption and the Possibility of Legal Interpretation', in G. Leyh (ed.), Legal Hermeneutics: History, Theory and Practice, University of California Press, Berkeley, 147–172.
Dry, M.: 1990, 'Flag Burning and the Constitution', in G. Casper, D. Hutchinson and D. Strauss (eds.), Supreme Court Review, University of Chicago, Chicago, 69–104.
Dworkin, R.: 1985, A Matter of Prinicple, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Dworkin, R.: 1986, Law's Empire, Belknap, Cambridge.
Dworkin, R.: 1996, Freedom's Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Ferguson, R. A.: 1990, 'The Judicial Opinion as Literary Genre', Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 2, 201–219.
Fish, S.: 1989, Doing What Come Naturally: Change, Rhetoric and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies, Duke University Press, Durham.
Fish, S.: 1994, There's No Such Thing as Free Speech, and its a Good Thing, Too, Oxford University Press, New York.
Fiss, O.M.: 1989, 'Objectivity and Interpretation', in S. Levinson and S. Mailloux (eds.), Interpreting Law and Literature: A Hermeneutic Reader, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, 229–249.
Gadamer, H. G.: 1989, Truth and Method, J. Weinsheimer and D. Marshall (trans), Continuum, New York.
Golden, J. L. and J. M. Makau: 1982, 'Perspectives on Judicial Reasoning', in R. E. McKerrow (ed.), Exploration in Rhetoric: Studies in Honor of Douglas Ehninger, Scott Forsman, Glenview, 157–178.
Greenwalt, K.: 1990, 'O'er the Land of the Free: Flag Burning as Speech', UCLA Law Review 37, 925–947.
Habermas, J.: 1984, The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, T. McCarthy (trans), MIT Press, Cambridge.
Habermas, J.: 1994, Between Facts and Norms, W. Rehg (trans), Beacon Press, Boston.
Hundley, H.: 1997, 'The Signification of the American Flag: A Semiotic Analysis of Texas v.Johnson', Free Speech Yearbook 35, 45–55.
Lewis, W.: 1994, 'Of Innocence, Exclusion, and the Burning of Flags: The Romantic Realism of the Law', Southern Communication Journal 60, 4–21.
Makau, J. M.: 1984, 'The Supreme Court and Reasonableness', Quarterly Journal of Speech 70, 259–278.
Perelman, C. and L. Olbrects-Tyteca: 1969, The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation, J. Wilkinson and P. Weaver (trans), University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.
Perelman, C.: 1963, The Idea of Justice and the Problem of Argument, Routledge, London.
Pollitt, D. H.: 1992, 'Reflection on the Bicentennial of the Bill of Rights: The Flag Burning Controversy: A Chronology', North Carolina Law Review 70, 553–614.
Rasmussen, D.: 1996, 'How is Valid Law Possible: A Review of Between Facts and Norms by Jurgen Habermas', in M. Deflem (ed.), Habermas, Modernity and Law, Sage Publications, London, 21–44.
Raz, J.: 1979, The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality, Clarendon Press, Oxford. Texas v. Johnson: 1989, 491 US 397. US Supreme Court.
Tushnet, M.: 1991, 'Critical Legal Studies: A Political History', Yale Law Journal 100, 1515–1541.
Unger, R. M.: 1990, The Critical Legal Studies Movement, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
White, J. B.: 1988, 'Judicial Criticism', in S. Levinson and S. Mailloux (eds.), Intepreting Law and Literature: A Hermeneutic Reader, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, 393–410.
White, J. B. 1990, Justice as Translation, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Balter, S.J. The Search for Grounds in Legal Argumentation: A Rhetorical Analysis of Texas vs Johnson. Argumentation 15, 381–395 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012282916984
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012282916984