Skip to main content
Log in

Recent Progress with the SMILETRAP Penning Mass Spectrometer

  • Published:
Hyperfine Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Penning trap mass spectrometer SMILETRAP has been considerably improved during the last two years. The helium pressure has been carefully stabilized and is now independent of irregular air pressure. The temperature of the hyperboloidal precision trap is stabilized to ±0.03°C. Remaining temperature instabilities are compensated by changes in the current of a warm coil surrounding the precision trap. The frequency synthesizer is now locked to GPS. This means that it is much easier to accurately measure resonances during several days. The improvements have demonstrated that in mass doublet measurements with an excitation time of 1 s it is possible to determine the mass of ions with q/A=1/2 at an uncertainty to a few times of 0.1 ppb, using selected rather than cooled ions. In routine measurements lasting for one day it is possible to reach a mass uncertainty of 1 ppb. The masses of the following particles and atoms have been measured with uncertainties in the region 0.3–2 ppb: p, 3H, 3He, 4He, 22Ne, 28Si, 36Ar, 76Ge, 76Se, 86Kr and 133Cs. It has also been shown that though we are using a warm bore the trap pressure is sufficiently low to prevent electron capture from the rest gas for excitation times of 3 s and for ion charges as high as 50+.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carlberg, C., Hyp. Interact. 114 (1998), 177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Carlberg, C. et al., Physica Scripta T 59 (1995), 196.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gräff, G., Kalinowsky, H. and Traut, J., Z. Phys. A 297 (1980), 35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bollen, G. et al., Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A 368 (1996), 675.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Beck, B. R., Steiger, J., Weinberg, G., Church, D. A., McDonald, J. and Schneider, D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996), 1735.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Douysset, G. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001), 4259.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Audi, G. and Wapstra, A. H., Nucl. Phys. A 565 (1993), 1.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. van Dyck, Jr., R. S., Farnham, D. L. and Schwinberg, P. B., Physica Scripta T 59 (1995), 134.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fritioff, T. et al., submitted to Europhysics J., rapid communications.

  10. Bradley, M. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999), 4510; Carlberg,C., Fritioff, T. and Bergström, I.,Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999), 4506.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. DiFilippo, F. et al., Physica Scripta T 59 (1995), 144.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ellis, R. J. et al., Nucl. Phys. A 435 (1985), 34.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hykaway, J. G. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (1991), 1708.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Audi, G., Wapstra, A. H. and Didieu, M., Nucl. Phys. A 565 (1993), 193.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rodrigues, G. C. et al., accepted by Phys. Rev. A.

  16. Bergström, I. et al., to be submitted to NIM.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fritioff, T., Carlberg, C., Douysset, G. et al. Recent Progress with the SMILETRAP Penning Mass Spectrometer. Hyperfine Interactions 132, 229–242 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011991032748

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011991032748

Navigation