Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 30, Issue 6, pp 603–614 | Cite as

Gender-Related Traits in Transsexuals and Nontranssexuals

  • Richard A. Lippa


Thirty-eight male-to-female (M-to-F) transsexuals, 7 female-to-male (F-to-M) transsexuals, 135 nontranssexual men, and 225 nontranssexual women were assessed on the following: gender diagnosticity (GD) measures, which assessed male- vs. female-typical occupational and hobby preferences; instrumentality; expressiveness; self-ascribed masculinity; and self-ascribed femininity. M-to-F transsexuals differed strongly and significantly from nontranssexual men on GD and self-ascribed femininity (effect sizes from 1.84 to 3.40) and more weakly on instrumentality, expressiveness, and self-ascribed masculinity (effect sizes from 0.40 to 0.56). F-to-M transsexuals differed strongly and significantly from nontranssexual women on GD and on self-ascribed masculinity and femininity (effect sizes from 2.45 to 3.97), but not on instrumentality or expressiveness (effect sizes of 0.07 and 0.39). The degree to which the six assessed gender-related traits distinguished transsexual from nontranssexuals was strongly correlated with the degree to which these same traits distinguished nontranssexual men from nontranssexual women. Using comparison data from past research, M-to-F transsexuals were quite similar to gay men on all gender-related traits except self-ascribed femininity, but F-to-M transsexuals were considerably more masculine than lesbian women on all gender-related traits except for instrumentality and expressiveness.

transsexuals gender-related traits masculinity femininity gender differences 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bailey, J. M. (1996). Gender identity. In Savin-Willaims, R. C., and Cohen, K. M. (eds.), The Lives of Lesbians, Gays, and Bisexuals: Children to Adults, Harcourt Brace, Fort Worth, TX.Google Scholar
  2. Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Gender differences in erotic plasticity: The female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive. Psychol. Bull. 126: 347–274.Google Scholar
  3. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 42: 165–172.Google Scholar
  4. Bem, S. L. (1981). Bem Sex-Role Inventory Professional Manual, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  5. Blanchard, R. (1985). Typology of female-to-male transsexualism. Arch. Sex. Behav. 14: 247–261.Google Scholar
  6. Blanchard, R. (1988). Nonhomosexual gender dysphoria. J. Sex Res. 24: 188–193.Google Scholar
  7. Blanchard, R. (1989a). The classification and labeling of nonhomosexual gender dysphoria. Arch. Sex. Behav. 18: 315–334.Google Scholar
  8. Blanchard, R. (1989b). The concept of autogynephilia and the typology of male gender dysphoria. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 177: 616–623.Google Scholar
  9. Blanchard, R. (1990). Gender identity disorders in adult men. In Blanchard, R., and Steiner, B. W. (eds.), Clinical Management of Gender Identity Disorders in Children and Adults, American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DC, pp. 49–76.Google Scholar
  10. Blanchard, R., and Freund, K. (1983). Measuring masculine gender identity in females. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 51: 205–214.Google Scholar
  11. Bodlund, O., and Armelius, K. (1995). Self-image and personality traits in gender identity disorders: An empirical study. J. Sex Marital Ther. 26: 303–317.Google Scholar
  12. Bohan, J. S. (1996). Psychology and Sexual Orientation: Coming to Terms, Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, L. S. (1995). Lesbian identities: Concepts and issues. In D'Augelli, A. R., and Patterson, C. J. (eds.), Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identities Over the Lifespan: Psychological Perspectives, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Constantinople, A. (1973). Masculinity-femininity: An exception to a famous dictum? Psychol. Bull. 80: 389–407.Google Scholar
  15. Freund, K., Langevin, R., Satterberg, J., and Steiner, B. (1977). Extension of the gender identity scale for males. Arch. Sex. Behav. 6: 507–519.Google Scholar
  16. Golden, C. (1996). What's in a name? Sexual self-identification among women. In Savin-Williams, R. C., and Cohen, K. M. (eds.), The Lives of Lesbians, Gays, and Bisexuals: Children to Adults, Harcourt Brace, Fort Worth, TX, pp. 229–249.Google Scholar
  17. Gough, H. B. (1987). CPI Administrator's Guide, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  18. Hathaway, S. R. (1980). Scale 5 (Masculinity-Femininity), 6 (Paranoia), and 8 (Schizophrenia). In Dahlstrom, W. G., and Dahlstrom, L. E. (eds.), Basic Readings on the MMPI, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 104–111.Google Scholar
  19. Holland, J. L. (1992). Making Vocational Choices, 2nd edn., Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL.Google Scholar
  20. Holland, J. L. (1996). Exploring careers with a typology: What we have learned and some new directions. Am. Psych. 51: 397–406.Google Scholar
  21. Johnson, S. L., and Hunt, D. D. (1990). The relationship of male transsexual typology to psychosocial adjustment. Arch. Sex. Behav. 19: 349–360.Google Scholar
  22. Leavitt, F., and Berger, J. C. (1990). Clinical patterns among male transsexual candidates with erotic interest in males. Arch. Sex. Behav. 19: 491–505.Google Scholar
  23. Lippa, R. (1991). Some psychometric characteristics of gender diagnosticity measures: Reliability, validity, consistency across domains, and relationship to the Big Five. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 61: 1000–1011.Google Scholar
  24. Lippa, R. (1995a). Do sex differences define gender-related individual differences within the sexes? Evidence from three studies. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 21: 349–355.Google Scholar
  25. Lippa, R. (1995b). Gender-related individual differences and psychological adjustment in terms of the Big Five and circumplex models. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 69: 1184–1202.Google Scholar
  26. Lippa, R. (1997). The display of masculinity, femininity, and gender diagnosticity in self-descriptive photo essays. J. Pers. 65: 139–169.Google Scholar
  27. Lippa, R. (1998a). The nonverbal judgment and display of extraversion, masculinity, femininity, and gender diagnosticity: A lens model analysis. J. Res. Pers. 32: 80–107.Google Scholar
  28. Lippa, R. (1998b). Gender-related individual differences and National Merit Test performance: Girls who are "masculine" and boys who are "feminine" tend to do better. In Ellis, L., and Ebertz, L. (eds.), Males, Females, and Behavior: Toward Biological Understanding, Praeger, Westport, CN.Google Scholar
  29. Lippa, R. A. (1998c). Gender-related individual differences and the structure of vocational interests: The importance of the "People-Things" dimension. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 74: 996–1009.Google Scholar
  30. Lippa, R. A. (2000). Gender-related traits in gay men, lesbian women, and heterosexual men and women: The virtual identity of homosexual-heterosexual diagnosticity and gender diagnosticity. J. Pers. Google Scholar
  31. Lippa, R. A. (2001). On deconstructing and reconstructing masculinity-femininity. J. Res. Pers. 35: 168–207.Google Scholar
  32. Lippa, R., and Arad, S. (1997). The structure of sexual orientation and its relation to masculinity, femininity, and gender diagnosticity: Different for men and women. Sex Roles 37: 187–208.Google Scholar
  33. Lippa, R., and Connelly, S. C. (1990). Gender diagnosticity: A new Bayesian approach to gender-related individual differences. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 59: 1051–1065.Google Scholar
  34. Lippa, R. A., and Tan, F. D. (2001). Does culture moderate the relationship between sexual orientation and gender-related personality traits? Cross-Cul. Res. 35: 65–87.Google Scholar
  35. Lothstein, L. M. (1984). Psychological testing with transsexuals: A 30-year review. J. Pers. Assess. 48: 500–507.Google Scholar
  36. Lubinski, D., Tellegen, A., and Butcher, J. N. (1983). Masculinity, femininity, and androgyny viewed and assessed as distinct concepts. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 44: 428–439.Google Scholar
  37. Midence, K., and Hargreaves, I. (1997). Psychosocial adjustment in male-to-female transsexuals: An overview of the research evidence. J. Psychol. 131: 602–614.Google Scholar
  38. Paulhus, D. L. (1987). Effects of group selection on correlations and factor patterns in sex role research. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 53: 314–317.Google Scholar
  39. Prediger, D. J. (1982). Dimensions underlying Holland's hexagon: Missing link between interests and occupations? J. Vocation. Behav. 21: 259–287.Google Scholar
  40. Spence, J. T., and Buckner, C. (1995). Masculinity and femininity: Defining the undefinable. In Kalbfleisch, P. J., and Cody, M. J. (eds.), Gender, Power, and Communication in Human Relationships, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 105–138.Google Scholar
  41. Spence, J. T., and Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and Femininity: Their Psychological Dimensions, Correlates, and Antecedents, University of Texas Press, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
  42. Spence, J. T., and Helmreich, R. L. (1980). Masculine instrumentality and feminine expressiveness: Their relationships with sex role attitudes and behaviors. Psychol. Women Q. 5: 147–163.Google Scholar
  43. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., and Stapp, J. (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity. JSAS (Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology), 4: 43–44 (MS. No. 617).Google Scholar
  44. Storms, M. D. (1979). Sex role identity and its relationship to sex role attributions and sex role stereotypes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 37: 1779–1789.Google Scholar
  45. Strong, E. K., Jr. (1943). Vocational Interests of Men and Women, Consulting Psychologists Press, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  46. Terman, L. M., and Miles, C. C. (1936). Sex and Personality: Studies in Masculinity and Femininity, Russell and Russell, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard A. Lippa
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentCalifornia State UniversityFullerton

Personalised recommendations