Skip to main content
Log in

Fire Risk Index for Historic Buildings

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fire protection engineers and preservation architects have long recognized the difficulty in applying building and fire codes to historic buildings. Small, older buildings of significant historic value need an efficient approach to performance-based evaluation. One technique that has gained acceptance is fire risk indexing. The Historic Fire Risk Index described in this paper uses a linear additive model of multiple attribute evaluation to produce a measure of relative fire risk. Weights are established to indicate the importance or significance of fire risk parameters. Then, for each specific historic structure, parameter grades, i.e., the amount or degree that a parameter is present, are determined from information collected in a detailed site survey. Fire risk is evaluated by the scalar product of the parameter weights and grades, producing a single numerical value representing the level of fire safety provided in the building. This is a more rational and more transparent method than the risk indexing systems currently published in model codes and standards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M.E. Kaplan, “The Regulation of Existing and Historic Buildings,” unpublished thesis, Troy, NY: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. ISO/TC 92/SC 4, “Fire Safety Engineering—The Application of Fire Performance Concepts to Design Objectives,” Committee Draft ISO CD 13387, International Organization for Standards, 1997, p. 5.

  3. J.M. Watts, Jr., “Fire Risk Assessment in Cultural Resource Facilities,” in Fire Risk and Hazard Assessment Symposium Proceedings, Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Research Foundation, 1996, pp. 508–522.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.M. Watts, Jr., and M.E. Kaplan, “Performance-Based Approaches to Protecting our Heritage,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Performance-Based Codes and Fire Safety Design Methods, Ottawa, Canada, September 24- 26, 1996, Boston: Society of Fire Protection Engineers, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A.F. Dean, “Analytic System for the Measurement of Relative Fire Hazard,” Chicago: Western Actuarial Bureau, 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.M. Watts, Jr., “Fire Risk Indexing,” in P.J. DiNenno et al. (eds.), SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 3rd ed., Quincy MA: National Fire Protection Association, 2002, sec. 5, chap. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  7. NFPA 101A, Guide on Alternative Approaches to Life Safety, Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, Quincy MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. The BOCA National Building Code/1996, Country Club Hills, IL: Building Officials and Code Administrators International, 1996.

  10. Wisconsin Administrative Code, chapter ILHR 70, “Historic Buildings,” Madison: Department of Industry, Labor, and Human Relations, 1995.

  11. J.M. Watts, Jr., “Fire Risk Assessment Using Multiattribute Evaluation,” in Fire Safety Science, Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium, International Association for Fire Safety Science, 1997, pp. 679–690.

  12. R.M. Dawes, “The Robust Beauty of Improper Linear Models in Decision Making,” American Psychologist, vol. 34, no. 7, 1979, pp. 571–582.

    Google Scholar 

  13. “Fire Safety Evaluation System for Business Occupancies,” in NFPA 101A, Guide on Alternative Approaches to Life Safety, Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1998, Chap. 7.

  14. “Compliance Alternatives,” in The BOCA National Building Code/1996, Country Club Hills, IL: Building Of.cialsand Code AdministratorsInternational, 1996, Section 3408.

  15. J.M. Watts, Jr., “Fire Risk Evaluation in the Codes: A Comparative Analysis,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Fire Research and Engineering, Gaithersburg, MD, 1997, pp. 226–237.

  16. J.M. Watts, Jr., “Analysis of the NFPA Fire Safety Evaluation System for Business Occupancies,” Fire Technology, vol. 33, no. 3, 1997.

  17. R.L. Keeny, and H. Raiffa, Decisions with Multiple Objectives, New York: John Wiley, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J.M. Watts, Jr., E.K. Budnick, and B.D. Kushler, “Using Decision Tables to Quantify Fire Risk Parameters,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Fire Research and Engineering, Boston: Society of Fire Protection Engineers, 1995, pp. 241–246.

    Google Scholar 

  19. L.L. Parks, B.D. Kushler, M.J. Serapiglia, L.A. McKenna, Jr., E.K. Budnick, and J.M. Watts, Jr., “Fire Risk Assessment for Telecommunications Central Offices,” Fire Technology, vol. 34, no. 2, 1998, pp. 156–176.

    Google Scholar 

  20. E.W. Marchant, “Fire Safety Evaluation (Points) Scheme for Patient Areas Within Hospitals,” Department of Fire Safety Engineering, University of Edinburgh, 1982.

  21. M.E. Kaplan, and J.M. Watts, Jr., “Development of a Prototypical Historic Fire Risk Index to Evaluate Fire Safety in Historic Buildings,” APT Bulletin, vol. 30, nos. 2- 3, 1999, pp. 49–54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watts, J.M., Kaplan, M.E. Fire Risk Index for Historic Buildings. Fire Technology 37, 167–180 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011649802894

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011649802894

Navigation