Four varieties of comparative analysis

  • Christopher G. Pickvance
Article

Abstract

The article starts by examining the definition of comparative analysis and what distinguishes it from analysis in general. It then identifies four varieties of comparative analysis according to (a) whether they aim to explain differences or similarities and (b) the assumptions they make about the underlying causal patterns present. While the former contrast is well known, it is argued that the latter contrast is fundamental and opens up many possible avenues for comparative analysis, which would otherwise be closed. Although the examples are drawn from the housing and urban studies field, the argument is of general applicability. The article considers in turn what is meant by comparative analysis, its main varieties, the research designs needed to undertake it, and some of the problems that arise.

causality comparative analysis plural causation research design 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boudon, R. (1967) L'analyse mathematique des faits sociaux, Plon, Paris.Google Scholar
  2. Boudon, R. (1974) The Logic of Sociological Explanation, Penguin, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, M.R. and Nagel, E. (1934) An Introduction to Logic and ScientificMethod, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  4. Davis, J.A. (1971) Elementary Survey Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  5. King, G., Keohane, R.O. and Verba, S. (1994) Designing Social Inquiry, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  6. Kish, L. (1959) Some statistical problems in research design, American Sociological Review, 24, 328-338.Google Scholar
  7. Kohn, M.L. (1987) Cross-national research as an analytical strategy, American Sociological Review,52, 713-731.Google Scholar
  8. Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955) The interpretation of statistical relations, In: The Language of Social Research (Eds, Lazarsfeld, P.F. and Rosenberg, M.), Free Press, New York, NY, pp. 115-125.Google Scholar
  9. Lieberson, S. (1992) Small N's and big conclusions: An examination of the reasoning in comparative studies based on a small number of cases, In: What is a Case? (Eds, Ragin, C.C. and Becker, H.S.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 105-118.Google Scholar
  10. Lieberson, S. (1994) More on the uneasy case for using Mill-type methods in small-N comparative studies, Social Forces,72, 1225-1237.Google Scholar
  11. Marcuse, P. (1982) Determinants of housing policy in West Germany and the U.S., In: Urban Policy Under Capitalism (Eds, Fainstein, N.I. and Fainstein, S.S.), Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 83-115.Google Scholar
  12. Mill, J.S. (1886) A System of Logic, Longmans Green, London.Google Scholar
  13. Mitchell, J.C. (1983) Case and situational analysis, Sociological Review,31, 187-211.Google Scholar
  14. Paige, J.M. (1999) Conjecture, comparison and conditional theory in macrosocial inquiry, American Journal of Sociology,105, 781-800.Google Scholar
  15. Pickvance, C.G. (1986) Comparative urban analysis and assumptions about causality, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,10, 162-184.Google Scholar
  16. Pickvance, C.G. (1995) Comparative analysis, causality and case studies in urban studies, In: The Urban Context (Eds, Rogers, A. and Vertovec, S.), Berg, Oxford, pp. 35-54.Google Scholar
  17. Pickvance, C.G. (1999) Democratisation and the decline of social movements: The effects of regime change on collective action in Eastern Europe, Southern Europe and Latin America, Sociology,33, 353-372.Google Scholar
  18. Przeworski, A. and Teune, H. (1970) The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry, Wiley, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  19. Ragin, C.C. (1987) The Comparative Method, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  20. Ragin, C.C. (1992) Introduction: Cases of ‘What is a Case?’ In: What is a Case? (Eds, Ragin, C.C. and Becker, H.S.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1-17.Google Scholar
  21. Ragin, C.C. and Becker, H.S. (Eds.) (1992) What is a Case? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  22. Sayer, A. (1992) Method in Social Science (Second edition), Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  23. Szelenyi, I. (1983) Urban Inequalities under State Socialism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  24. Tilly, C. (1984) Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  25. Walton, J. (1992) Making the theoretical case, In: What is a Case? (Eds, Ragin, C.C. and Becker, H.S.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 121-137.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher G. Pickvance
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social ResearchUniversity of KentCanterbury, KentU.K.

Personalised recommendations