Advertisement

Grammars

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 1–19 | Cite as

Peirce Grammar

  • Michael Böttner
Article

Abstract

Peirce grammar is a context-free grammar with a Peirce algebra as its semantics. A Peirce algebra is a two-sorted algebra that presupposes a Boolean algebra and a relation algebra. Since Peirce algebra has an equational theory many natural language inferences can be captured in terms of equational computation. The notions of a Peirce algebra and a Peirce grammar are applied to natural language. It is shown that the meaning of anaphoric pronouns, in particular possessive, relative, reciprocal, identity, and diversity pronouns can be constructed without use of variables or generalized quantifiers.

algebraic semantics anaphoric pronoun equational logic knowledge representation relation algebra relational grammar semantic grammar variable-free semantics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bloomfield, L. Language, Allen & Unwin, London, 1933.Google Scholar
  2. Böttner, M. State transition semantics, Theoretical Linguistics, 18: 239–286, 1992.Google Scholar
  3. Böttner, M. A collective extension of relational grammar, Logic Journal of the Interest Group in Pure and Applied Logics, 6: 175–193, 1998.Google Scholar
  4. Böttner, M. Relationale Grammatik. Niemeyer, Tübingen, 1999.Google Scholar
  5. Böttner, M. and W. Thümmel, editors. Variable-Free Semantics, Secolo, Osnabrück, (2000).Google Scholar
  6. Brink, C. Boolean modules, Journal of Algebra, 71: 291–313, 1981.Google Scholar
  7. Brink, C.,K. Britzand R. Schmidt.Peircealgebras, Formal Aspects of Computing, 6: 339–358, 1994.Google Scholar
  8. Brink, C., G. Kahl and G. Schmidt, editors. Relational Methods in Computer Science, Springer, Wien, 1997.Google Scholar
  9. Brink, C. and R. Schmidt. Subsumption computed algebraically, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 23: 329–342, 1992.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, H. Using Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.Google Scholar
  11. Dalrymple, M., M. Kanazawa, Y. Kim, S. Mchombo and S. Peters. Reciprocal expressions and the concept of reciprocity, Linguistics and Philosophy, 21: 159–210, 1998.Google Scholar
  12. Jacobson, P. Bach-Peters sentences in a variable-free semantics. In P. Dekker and M. Stokhof, editors, Proceedings of the Eigth Amsterdam Colloquium. December 17-20, 1991. 283–302, ILLC, University of Amsterdam, 1992.Google Scholar
  13. Jakobson, R. A few remarks on Peirce, pathfinder in the science of language. In R. Jakobson, editor, The Framework of Language, 31–38, Michigan Studies in the Humanities, 1980.Google Scholar
  14. Keenan, E.L. Unreducible n-ary quantifiers in natural language. In P. Gärdenfors, editor, Generalized Quantifiers, 109–150, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1987.Google Scholar
  15. Keenan, E.L. and L.M. Faltz. Boolean Semantics for Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1985.Google Scholar
  16. Link, G. Algebraic Semantics in Language and Philosophy, CSLI Press, Stanford, 1998.Google Scholar
  17. Lyons, J. Natural Language and Universal Grammar, vol. I, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991.Google Scholar
  18. Rich, E. Artificial Intelligence, McGraw Hill, New York, 1983.Google Scholar
  19. de Rijke, M. The logic of Peirce algebras, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 4: 227–250, 1995.Google Scholar
  20. Steedman, M. Surface Structure and Interpretation, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1997.Google Scholar
  21. Suppes, P. Semantics of context-free fragments of natural languages. In K.J.J. Hintikka et al., editors, Approaches to Natural Language, 370–394, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1973.Google Scholar
  22. Suppes, P. Elimination of quantifiers in the semantics of natural language by use of extended relation algebras, Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 117/118: 243–259, 1976.Google Scholar
  23. Suppes, P. Language for Humans and Robots. Blackwell, Oxford, 1991.Google Scholar
  24. Suppes, P. and E. Macken. Steps toward a variable-free semantics of attributive adjectives, possessives, and intensifying adverbs. In K.E. Nelson, editor, Children's language, vol. 1, 81–115, Gardner Press, New York, 1978.Google Scholar
  25. Suppes, P. and M. Zanotti. On using random relations to generate upper and lower probabilities, Synthese, 36: 427–440, 1977.Google Scholar
  26. Tarski, A. and S. Givant. A Formalization of Set Theory without Variables. AMS Colloquium Publications 41, Providence RI, 1987.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Böttner
    • 1
  1. 1.Learning Research and Development CenterUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations