Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 55–63 | Cite as

Adaptations to Captivity in the Butterfly Pieris brassicae (L.) and the Implications for Ex situ Conservation

Article

Abstract

Captive breeding has been suggested as a method of conserving many threatened vertebrates, and is increasingly being proposed as a valuable conservation strategy for invertebrates. Potential genetic problems associated with ex situ conservation are widely recognized, but a further issue has received less attention: the possibility that populations will undergo adaptation to the captive environment, rendering them less well adapted to survival in the wild. We investigated six traits related to dispersal and reproduction in a culture of the large white butterfly Pieris brassicae (L.), that had been captive for c. 100–150 generations, and in recently wild stock reared simultaneously in a common environment. Individuals in the captive culture were heavier, with smaller wings and lower wing aspect ratios. Females from the captive culture laid many more eggs in cage experiments, and had higher ovary mass at the time of peak egg production. These differences are consistent with adaptation to captive conditions. Over time, similar evolutionary changes may affect invertebrates reared in ex situ conservation programmes, decreasing the likelihood that these species can be re-established in the wild. Although the timescale over which most vertebrates are likely to adapt to captivity is longer, and the traits involved will be different, invertebrates like P. brassicae may also provide a model of potential problems in long-term ex situ conservation programmes for both invertebrates and vertebrates. We suggest that measures to reduce or slow adaptation to captivity should be introduced alongside measures to reduce deleterious genetic effects in captive populations.

captive breeding evolution fitness morphology reproduction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ayala, F.J. (1965) Evolution of fitness of experimental populations of Drosophila serrata. Science 150, 903-5.Google Scholar
  2. Balmford, A., Mace, G.M. and Leader-Williams, N. (1996) Designing the ark: setting priorities for captive breeding. Conserv. Biol. 10, 719-27.Google Scholar
  3. Betts, C.R. and Wootton, R.J. (1988) Wing shape and flight behaviour in butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea): a preliminary analysis. J. Exp. Biol. 138, 271-88.Google Scholar
  4. Boggs, C.L. (1986) Reproductive strategies of female butterflies: variation in and constraints on fecundity. Ecol. Entomol. 11, 7-15.Google Scholar
  5. Bryant, E.H. and Reed, D.H. (1999) Fitness decline under relaxed selection in captive populations. Conserv. Biol. 13, 665-9.Google Scholar
  6. Bush, G.L., Neck, R.W. and Kitto G.B. (1976) Screworm eradication: inadvertent selection for non-competitive ecotypes during mass rearing. Science 193, 491-3.Google Scholar
  7. Caro, T. (1999) The behaviour-conservation interface. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 366-9.Google Scholar
  8. David, W.A.L. and Gardiner, B.O.C. (1962) Oviposition and the hatching of the eggs of Pieris brassicae (L.) in a laboratory culture. Bull. Entomol. Res. 53, 91-109.Google Scholar
  9. Ebenhard, T. (1995) Conservation breeding as a tool for saving animal species from extinction. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 438-43.Google Scholar
  10. Feltwell, J. (1982) Large white butterfly. The biology, biochemistry and physiology of Pieris brassicae (L.). The Hague: W. Junk.Google Scholar
  11. Fleming, I.A., Jonsson, B., Gross, M.R. and Lamberg, A. (1996) An experimental study of the reproductive behaviour and success of farmed and wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). J. Appl. Ecol. 33, 893-905.Google Scholar
  12. Frankel, O.H. and Soulé, M.E. (1981) Conservation and evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  13. Frankham, R. and Loebel, D.A. (1992) Modeling problems in conservation genetics using captive Drosophila populations: rapid genetic adaptation to captivity. Zoo Biol. 11, 333-42.Google Scholar
  14. Frankham, R. (1995) Conservation genetics. Ann. Rev. Gene. 29, 305-27.Google Scholar
  15. Gunn, A. and Gatehouse, A.G. (1993) The migration syndrome in the African armyworm moth, Spodoptera exempta-allocation of resources to flight and reproduction. Physiol. Entomol. 18, 149-59.Google Scholar
  16. Gunn, A., Gatehouse, A.G. and Woodrow, K.P. (1989) Trade-off between flight and reproduction in the African armyworm moth, Spodoptera exempta. Physiol. Entomol. 14, 419-27.Google Scholar
  17. Hughes, D.G. and Bennett, P.M. (1991) Captive breeding and the conservation of invertebrates. Int. Zoo Yb. 30, 45-51.Google Scholar
  18. IUCN (1987) The IUCNPolicy statement on captive breeding. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  19. Karlsson, B. and Wickman, P.-O. (1990) Increase in reproductive effort as explained by body size and resource allocation in the speckled wood butterfly, Pararge aegeria (L.). Func. Ecol. 4, 609-17.Google Scholar
  20. Kohane, M.J. and Parsons, P.A. (1988) Domestication: evolutionary change under stress. Evol. Biol. 23, 31-48.Google Scholar
  21. Lachance, S. and Magnan, P. (1990) Comparative ecology and behaviour of domestic, hybrid, and wild strains of brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis, after stocking. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 47, 2285-92.Google Scholar
  22. Lacy, R.C. (1994) Managing genetic diversity in captive populations of animals. In Restoration of endangered species: conceptual issues, planning and implementation (M.L. Bowles and C.J. Whelan, eds), pp. 63-89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lande, R. and Barrowclough, G.F. (1987) Effective population size, genetic variation, and their use in population management. In Viable populations for conservation (M.E. Soulé, ed), pp. 87-123. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Marden, J.H. (1987) Maximum lift production during takeoff in flying animals. J. Exp. Biol. 130, 235-58.Google Scholar
  25. Marden, J.H. and Chai, P. (1991) Aerial predation and butterfly design: how palatability, mimicry, and the need for evasive flight constrain mass allocation. Am. Natur. 138, 15-36.Google Scholar
  26. Miyatake, T. and Yamagishi, M. (1999) Rapid evolution of larval development time during mass-rearing in the melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae. Res. Popul. Ecol. 41, 291-7.Google Scholar
  27. Morton, A.C. (1991) Captive breeding of butterflies and moths: II. Conserving variation and managing biodiversity. Int. Zoo Yb. 30, 89-97.Google Scholar
  28. Nicholls, C.N. and Pullin, A.S. (2000) A comparison of larval survivorship in wild and introduced populations of the large copper butterfly (Lycaena dispar batavus). Biol. Conserv. 93, 349-358.Google Scholar
  29. Pearce-Kelly, P., Jones, R., Clarke, D., Walter, C., Atkin, P. and Cunningham, A.A. (1998) The captive rearing of threatened orthoptera: a comparison of the conservation potential and practical considerations of two species' breeding programmes at the Zoological Society of London. J. Insect Conserv. 2, 201-10.Google Scholar
  30. Philippart, J.C. (1995) Is captive breeding an effective solution for the preservation of endemic species? Biol. Conserv. 72, 281-95.Google Scholar
  31. Pollard, E. and Yates, T. (1995) Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  32. Price, E.O. (1984) Behavioural aspects of animal domestication. Quart. Rev. Biol. 59, 1-32.Google Scholar
  33. Rahbek, C. (1993) Captive breeding-a useful tool in the preservation of biodiversity? Biodiver. Conserv. 2, 426-37.Google Scholar
  34. Rankin, M.A. and Burchsted, J.C.A. (1992) The cost of migration in insects. Ann. Rev. Entomol 37, 533-59.Google Scholar
  35. Roff, D.A. (1984) The cost of being able to fly: a study of wing polymorphism in two species of crickets. Oecologia (Berlin) 63, 30-7.Google Scholar
  36. Roff, D.A. (1990) The evolution of flightlessness in insects. Ecol. Monogr. 60, 389-421.Google Scholar
  37. Roff, D.A. (1991) Life history consequences of bioenergetic and biomechanical constraints on migration. Am. Zool. 31, 205-15.Google Scholar
  38. Ryman, N. (1991) Conservation genetics considerations in fishery management. J. Fish Biol. 39 (Suppl. A), 211-24.Google Scholar
  39. Saccheri, I.J., Brakefield, P.M. and Nichols, R.A. (1996) Severe inbreeding depression and rapid fitness rebound in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana (Satyridae). Evolution 50, 2000-13.Google Scholar
  40. Sgro C.M. and Partridge, L. (2000) Evolutionary responses of the life history of wild-caught Drosophila melanogaster to two standard methods of laboratory culture Am. Natur. 156, 341-53.Google Scholar
  41. Soulé, M.E. and Wilcox, B.A. (eds) (1980) Conservation Biology: an evolutionary ecological perspective. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  42. Soulé, M., Gilpin, M., Conway, W. and Foose, T. (1986) The millennium ark: how long a voyage, how many staterooms, how many passengers? Zoo Biol. 5, 101-13.Google Scholar
  43. Spieth, H.R. and Kaschuba-Holtgrave, A. (1996) A new experimental approach to investigate migration in Pieris brassicae L. Ecol. Entomol. 21, 289-94.Google Scholar
  44. Srygley, R.B. and Chai, P. (1990) Flight morphology of neotropical butterflies: palatability and distribution of mass to the thorax and abdomen. Oecologia (Berlin) 84, 491-9.Google Scholar
  45. Stockwell, C.A. and Weeks, S.C. (1999) Translocations and rapid evolutionary change in recently established populations of western mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis). Ani. Conserv. 2, 103-10.Google Scholar
  46. Sutherland, W.J. (1998) Managing habitats and species. In Conservation science and action, (W.J. Sutherland, ed), pp. 202-19. Oxford: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
  47. Van Swaay, C.A.M. and Warren, M.S. (1999) Red Data Book of European butterflies (Rhopalocera). Nature and environment, No. 99, Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg.Google Scholar
  48. Wicklund, C., Nylin, S. and Forsberg, J. (1991) Sex-related variation in growth rate as a result of selection for large size and protandry in a bivoltine butterfly (Pieris napi L.). Oikos 60, 241-50.Google Scholar
  49. Wickman, P.-O. and Karlsson, B. (1989) Abdomen size, body size, and the reproductive effort of insects. Oikos 56, 209-14.Google Scholar
  50. Zar, J.H. (1984) Biostatistical analysis. London: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  51. Zera, A.J. and Denno, R.F. (1997) Physiology and ecology of dispersal polymorphism in insects. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 42, 207-31.Google Scholar
  52. Zouros, E., Loukas, M., Economopolos, A. and Mazomenos, B. (1982) Selection at the alcohol dehydrogenase locus of the olive fruit fly Dacus oleae under artificial rearing. Heredity 48, 169-85.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation, School of BiologyUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordU.K.

Personalised recommendations